Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Five-Minute Workday Article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5971340" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>You're being a bit overly-specific. My example was meant to show that 5e won't necessarily be any more strict about what you MUST include in a day than 4e was. </p><p></p><p>If you skew the inputs, your outputs will be skewed. If you use a preponderance of minions, your controllers will feel mightier and your strikers and defenders will feel weaker. If you use a lot of brutes and artillery, your leaders and defenders might shine. With solos, strikers and defenders work their magic. If you have only one encounter in any given day, that day, the Daily abilities might dominate. If you always have 3+ encounters on each day, At-Wills and Encounters get better.If you use a variety, over time, it's not a significant deal: everyone does their thing and no one feels left out. If you run a game wherein your only encounters are ever solos, that's going to skew things. </p><p></p><p>There's no game system in existence wherein variety is a possibility that does not have this skew. If you take a game capable of modeling a lancing competition between knights and also picking pockets, and then arrange your game so that most of the time is spent picking pockets, those who invested in mounted combat are not going to contribute as much. And vice-versa. In order to run this hypothetical game of Soldiers & Skullduggery in a "balanced" way, you'll need to include a variety: picking pockets AND mounted combat! </p><p></p><p>That's not a strict rule. It's a guideline for balance. It could be a strict rule (YOU MUST ALTERNATE YOUR SOLDIERS WITH YOUR SKULLDUGGERY EVERY HALF HOUR OF GAME PLAY), but I think most folks would rather rightly balk at such a thing. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Let us not mistake a guideline for an absolute and then get all Chicken Little, here. You've got the 5e rules in front of you right now, with all their apparently game-breaking Vancian magic, right? Does anything on that page limit your ability to run encounters of varied strengths at varied numbers and intervals? Or has my experience with different monsters, different response rates, different caves, etc. anomalous? Is my reading of the part where they leave the encounter rates up to DM judgement misaligned? </p><p></p><p>Or, quite possibly, is it actually not as disastrous as it is being made out to be, here?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 5971340, member: 2067"] You're being a bit overly-specific. My example was meant to show that 5e won't necessarily be any more strict about what you MUST include in a day than 4e was. If you skew the inputs, your outputs will be skewed. If you use a preponderance of minions, your controllers will feel mightier and your strikers and defenders will feel weaker. If you use a lot of brutes and artillery, your leaders and defenders might shine. With solos, strikers and defenders work their magic. If you have only one encounter in any given day, that day, the Daily abilities might dominate. If you always have 3+ encounters on each day, At-Wills and Encounters get better.If you use a variety, over time, it's not a significant deal: everyone does their thing and no one feels left out. If you run a game wherein your only encounters are ever solos, that's going to skew things. There's no game system in existence wherein variety is a possibility that does not have this skew. If you take a game capable of modeling a lancing competition between knights and also picking pockets, and then arrange your game so that most of the time is spent picking pockets, those who invested in mounted combat are not going to contribute as much. And vice-versa. In order to run this hypothetical game of Soldiers & Skullduggery in a "balanced" way, you'll need to include a variety: picking pockets AND mounted combat! That's not a strict rule. It's a guideline for balance. It could be a strict rule (YOU MUST ALTERNATE YOUR SOLDIERS WITH YOUR SKULLDUGGERY EVERY HALF HOUR OF GAME PLAY), but I think most folks would rather rightly balk at such a thing. Let us not mistake a guideline for an absolute and then get all Chicken Little, here. You've got the 5e rules in front of you right now, with all their apparently game-breaking Vancian magic, right? Does anything on that page limit your ability to run encounters of varied strengths at varied numbers and intervals? Or has my experience with different monsters, different response rates, different caves, etc. anomalous? Is my reading of the part where they leave the encounter rates up to DM judgement misaligned? Or, quite possibly, is it actually not as disastrous as it is being made out to be, here? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Five-Minute Workday Article
Top