Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark" data-source="post: 1307589" data-attributes="member: 5">Naw.&nbsp; Not yet for me, please.&nbsp; I get quite a bit of exposure, I think, between being quite active on these boards, Chicago Gamedays, a fairly good amount of reviews, etc.&nbsp; I think, in all fairness, this project might be a nice way to give those who are struggling a way to get their message across.I would like to propose that a list be started based on who has the least reviews available in the EN World d20 reviews database (alphabetcal where there are ties).&nbsp; Contact each of those companies and base the weekly list on who responds most quickly in cases where there's a week that someone doesn't get their response in on time.Given that there are a lot of d20/OGL publishers, if the response to this is very good, perhaps do a couple of them (or even three) each week.&nbsp; If everyone is responding, doing three a week would allow this to be roughly a once a year update for each publisher (assuming that roughly 150 active publishers will respond).&nbsp; Perhaps the initial post in the thread could be used to keep track of them all and link to the place in the thread (or seperate thread) where that particular publisher has chimed in with their update.Just a few more thoughts... (And thanks for the offer, but I think it is best if I wait for my fair turn.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark, post: 1307589, member: 5"] Naw. Not yet for me, please. I get quite a bit of exposure, I think, between being quite active on these boards, Chicago Gamedays, a fairly good amount of reviews, etc. I think, in all fairness, this project might be a nice way to give those who are struggling a way to get their message across. I would like to propose that a list be started based on who has the least reviews available in the EN World d20 reviews database (alphabetcal where there are ties). Contact each of those companies and base the weekly list on who responds most quickly in cases where there's a week that someone doesn't get their response in on time. Given that there are a lot of d20/OGL publishers, if the response to this is very good, perhaps do a couple of them (or even three) each week. If everyone is responding, doing three a week would allow this to be roughly a once a year update for each publisher (assuming that roughly 150 active publishers will respond). Perhaps the initial post in the thread could be used to keep track of them all and link to the place in the thread (or seperate thread) where that particular publisher has chimed in with their update. Just a few more thoughts... (And thanks for the offer, but I think it is best if I wait for my fair turn.) [/QUOTE]

Verification