Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Five Takeaways From the 2025 Monster Manual
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 9636348" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Probably because no one has ever latched onto Goblins as representing a particular real world ethnic group. </p><p></p><p>This is the Klingon problem. In Star Trek, the Klingons evolved over time from being simplistic orcs that reveled in being deceitful tricky backstabbing monsters, fulfilling the role of "obvious one-dimensional bad guys" well, to being an honorable warrior species. But because people aren't very creative, in trying to make the Klingons into less one-dimensional villains people with the best of intentions but no real discernment started increasingly borrowing bits of Japanese culture and gluing it onto the Klingons - making them more and more like Samurai. So now it is reasonable to ask, "Are Klingons a sort of negative Asian stereotype?" And the answer should be, "No, Klingons aren't Asian, Sulu is Asian. Klingons are Klingons." But well, that argument is hard to sustain once people start deliberately developing their culture from Japanese, down to having Klingon Opera based on Noh and so forth. Mix in a liberal sprinkling of Viking culture (as it is popularly imagined) and you have "honorable warrior people who love fighting". Is it racist? Well, maybe or maybe not, but it isn't very creative.</p><p></p><p>The same thing has happened particular with Orcs and Native Americans, both in D&D products and outside D&D. Need a primitive warrior people? Grab Native American garb. Heck, WotC for all its protesting is still doing this stupidity, presenting orcs in the most recent addition as Latinos. </p><p></p><p>Now, could I protest that Goblins are a negative racial stereotype? I probably could. We could actually trace that as well, though I don't think it is was ever the intention, it does suggest how even in the 1990s attempts to be "racially sensitive" often led to being more racist than before rather than less. (Again, Latino orcs or the fact that Lando Calrissian is a more respectful black character than Finn, as poor John Boyega who deserved better will happily agree with me on.)</p><p></p><p>Personally, I think that WotC is just making the problem worse and more embarrassing (those minstrel people in the Spelljammer setting, what the heck were they thinking?) I can sympathize with, "We don't want people to identify this fantasy species with an ethnic group", but every time they try to fix it I feel they make the problem radically worse. And the problem of thinking that "you can't have sentient species who are inherently evil; let's fix the problem by doing away with that" is that it just leads to absurdity, as some other controversies in popular media are showing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 9636348, member: 4937"] Probably because no one has ever latched onto Goblins as representing a particular real world ethnic group. This is the Klingon problem. In Star Trek, the Klingons evolved over time from being simplistic orcs that reveled in being deceitful tricky backstabbing monsters, fulfilling the role of "obvious one-dimensional bad guys" well, to being an honorable warrior species. But because people aren't very creative, in trying to make the Klingons into less one-dimensional villains people with the best of intentions but no real discernment started increasingly borrowing bits of Japanese culture and gluing it onto the Klingons - making them more and more like Samurai. So now it is reasonable to ask, "Are Klingons a sort of negative Asian stereotype?" And the answer should be, "No, Klingons aren't Asian, Sulu is Asian. Klingons are Klingons." But well, that argument is hard to sustain once people start deliberately developing their culture from Japanese, down to having Klingon Opera based on Noh and so forth. Mix in a liberal sprinkling of Viking culture (as it is popularly imagined) and you have "honorable warrior people who love fighting". Is it racist? Well, maybe or maybe not, but it isn't very creative. The same thing has happened particular with Orcs and Native Americans, both in D&D products and outside D&D. Need a primitive warrior people? Grab Native American garb. Heck, WotC for all its protesting is still doing this stupidity, presenting orcs in the most recent addition as Latinos. Now, could I protest that Goblins are a negative racial stereotype? I probably could. We could actually trace that as well, though I don't think it is was ever the intention, it does suggest how even in the 1990s attempts to be "racially sensitive" often led to being more racist than before rather than less. (Again, Latino orcs or the fact that Lando Calrissian is a more respectful black character than Finn, as poor John Boyega who deserved better will happily agree with me on.) Personally, I think that WotC is just making the problem worse and more embarrassing (those minstrel people in the Spelljammer setting, what the heck were they thinking?) I can sympathize with, "We don't want people to identify this fantasy species with an ethnic group", but every time they try to fix it I feel they make the problem radically worse. And the problem of thinking that "you can't have sentient species who are inherently evil; let's fix the problem by doing away with that" is that it just leads to absurdity, as some other controversies in popular media are showing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Five Takeaways From the 2025 Monster Manual
Top