Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Fixed duration" to "save ends"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 5379511" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>The purpose of the saving throw mechanic changed in 4E. It's no longer to avoid a given effect; that's what the array of defenses are for. Rather, it's a (normally) fixed difficulty to shake off an effect. Its purpose, on the meta-level, is to take the place of duration-tracking. You no longer have to keep track of whether it's been three rounds or four since the effect began; you just roll each round to see if it ends.</p><p></p><p>And that's fine, as far as it goes. It definitely runs more smoothly in <em>that </em>respect.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, the ease and smoothness break down when you get to powers that <em>aren't </em>"save ends." Powers or effects with durations like:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Until the start of your next turn.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Until the end of your next turn.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Until the start of the target's next turn.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Until the end of the target's next turn.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I find that those often become something of a headache to track. Oh, it can be done--it can be done fairly smoothly by a well-prepared DM--but it still gets tedious, at times.</p><p></p><p>As I may be running a game in the near future--for the first time in a few years, I must admit--I've been contemplating this. And I've come up with a house rule that I'd like to test, but I'm interested in what other gamers think.</p><p></p><p>In essence, I would eliminate every one of the aforementioned durations. Every power with an ongoing effect is "save ends." <em>But...</em></p><p></p><p>There are now <em>two </em>levels of saving throw. Every power that is currently a "save ends" power gets a "hard save," which is 10+, as the game currently stands. Every power that currently has an "until X" duration gets an "easy save," which is 6+.</p><p></p><p>The practical effects of this are that, <em>most of the time</em>, such powers will only last until the end of the creature's next turn. (And with solos, they'll automatically end, since the +5 save bonus means even a 1 makes the 6 DC, and saves aren't included in the "auto-hit/auto-miss" rules that apply to attack rolls.) But <em>on occasion</em>, they'll squeak out an extra round or two.</p><p></p><p>Now, I recognize that this isn't 100% analogous to the old system. There are subtle but important differences between "until the end of the creature's next turn" and "until the end of your next turn." In the latter case, you yourself get to take advantage of whatever effect you put on the creature, during your next attack; in the former, you don't. My system loses that level of granularity--or rather, makes it less predictable. But I think it'll average out to close enough for <em>most</em> powers. And for those powers that really seem nerfed by the change, we can house rule the power as well to tweak it back to equality with others.</p><p></p><p>So rather than having to keep track of whose turn effect X ends on, or whether it's at the start or the end of the turn, all the DM has to do when someone suffers an ongoing effect is to mark H or E next to the description, and roll accordingly. No tracking, no real bookkeeping; just a few die rolls at the end of the turn.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts, opinions, and any implications you don't think I'm seeing are all welcome.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 5379511, member: 1288"] The purpose of the saving throw mechanic changed in 4E. It's no longer to avoid a given effect; that's what the array of defenses are for. Rather, it's a (normally) fixed difficulty to shake off an effect. Its purpose, on the meta-level, is to take the place of duration-tracking. You no longer have to keep track of whether it's been three rounds or four since the effect began; you just roll each round to see if it ends. And that's fine, as far as it goes. It definitely runs more smoothly in [I]that [/I]respect. Unfortunately, the ease and smoothness break down when you get to powers that [I]aren't [/I]"save ends." Powers or effects with durations like: [LIST] [*]Until the start of your next turn. [*]Until the end of your next turn. [*]Until the start of the target's next turn. [*]Until the end of the target's next turn. [/LIST] I find that those often become something of a headache to track. Oh, it can be done--it can be done fairly smoothly by a well-prepared DM--but it still gets tedious, at times. As I may be running a game in the near future--for the first time in a few years, I must admit--I've been contemplating this. And I've come up with a house rule that I'd like to test, but I'm interested in what other gamers think. In essence, I would eliminate every one of the aforementioned durations. Every power with an ongoing effect is "save ends." [I]But...[/I] There are now [I]two [/I]levels of saving throw. Every power that is currently a "save ends" power gets a "hard save," which is 10+, as the game currently stands. Every power that currently has an "until X" duration gets an "easy save," which is 6+. The practical effects of this are that, [I]most of the time[/I], such powers will only last until the end of the creature's next turn. (And with solos, they'll automatically end, since the +5 save bonus means even a 1 makes the 6 DC, and saves aren't included in the "auto-hit/auto-miss" rules that apply to attack rolls.) But [I]on occasion[/I], they'll squeak out an extra round or two. Now, I recognize that this isn't 100% analogous to the old system. There are subtle but important differences between "until the end of the creature's next turn" and "until the end of your next turn." In the latter case, you yourself get to take advantage of whatever effect you put on the creature, during your next attack; in the former, you don't. My system loses that level of granularity--or rather, makes it less predictable. But I think it'll average out to close enough for [I]most[/I] powers. And for those powers that really seem nerfed by the change, we can house rule the power as well to tweak it back to equality with others. So rather than having to keep track of whose turn effect X ends on, or whether it's at the start or the end of the turn, all the DM has to do when someone suffers an ongoing effect is to mark H or E next to the description, and roll accordingly. No tracking, no real bookkeeping; just a few die rolls at the end of the turn. Thoughts, opinions, and any implications you don't think I'm seeing are all welcome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Fixed duration" to "save ends"
Top