Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Fixing 4e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smathis" data-source="post: 4291118" data-attributes="member: 56465"><p>All around bad idea. Completely blows the balance of the game out of the water -- in terms of character-to-character and PCs-to-Monsters. What is it you want to keep from 4e that you're interested in gutting 25-30% of the PHB?</p><p></p><p></p><p>No need. Basic algebra here. If I subtract 15% from starting HP and monster HP, what am I gaining? A zero sum. If you want combats to be shorter, I have three words for you...</p><p></p><p>Exploding.</p><p></p><p>Damage.</p><p></p><p>Dice.</p><p></p><p>It would throw off the balance some but in a way that would be fun. And it would be easy to mitigate or scale down -- only one damage die in a roll explodes, player chooses.</p><p></p><p>That and lethality would go through the roof -- which seems to be where you're going with this...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unnecessary. I'd go with 4d6, drop the lowest or the standard arrays. No need to gank the PCs out of the gate like this. 4d6, dropping the lowest, will produce wide enough fluctuations that you'd still get some pretty odd scores --- like a PC with 2 18s or a 5 and a 6.</p><p></p><p>I'm inclined to pass on a suggestion from Mearls' blog where he states that giving all PCs 10 pts of GURPS disadvantages is a nice touch. I tend to agree.</p><p></p><p>No one ever plays a 6 Cha or an 8 Int. At least no one I've ever known who used them as a dump stat.</p><p></p><p>But if they have the disad "Likes to Gamble" or "Dark Secret". Yeah, those are the ones that tend to make it to the table.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Basically, removing the powers is akin to removing Magic Items in 3e. A complete rewrite. Reference: Iron Heroes. </p><p></p><p>There are better ways to go without a grid in 4e.</p><p></p><p>The real trick is to figure out what all this forced movement and shifting translates to in your head. I mean, this powers say that you can move 2 squares before an attack and such. But what does that mean? How would a PC or monster use that to advantage?</p><p></p><p>Once those things are understood, 4e is no more difficult to run without a grid than 3e. And if you follow the "Say Yes" advice in the DMG, you'll run into significantly fewer headaches.</p><p></p><p>More here</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=4112306&postcount=25" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=4112306&postcount=25</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have the same problem with Identify, Magic Items and Residuum. In fact, I've had a problem with the Magic Item Economy since it was brought to the forefront in 3e.</p><p></p><p>Basically, I plan to treat Residuum as the D&D equivalent of Deadlands' Ghost Rock. I plan to be traipsing around in the Wilderlands of High Fantasy so that's not a big deal for me. They have a similar substance called "Magicum".</p><p></p><p>I want to give Magic Items the Stormbringer treatment. Basically an item grows in power with you. So a Paladin may pick up a magic sword at 1st level. But by the time he reaches 25th the sword will be a Holy Avenger.</p><p></p><p>I reviewed the Magic Items last night and this doesn't look too hard.</p><p></p><p>Neither does completely removing Magic Items and just giving the PCs a straight bonus to Attacks and Defenses (AC too) at all the levels divisible by 5. I'd also throw an extra d6 per tier on crits too. But that's me being nice.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah. This will suck more than you realize. I know that 4e PCs <em>look</em> uber from the perspective of previous editions. But they're <em>not</em>.</p><p></p><p>If you want gritty and desperate combat...</p><p></p><p>Every time a PC is dropped below zero they lose a Healing Surge. Ouch.</p><p></p><p>Every time a PC fails a Death Save, the total surges they can have are lowered by one until they can make it back to town and rest up. Those are your wounds right there.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure I'll be using either of those variants, though. I think they'd just be too rough.</p><p></p><p>Here's how I planned to handle the full refresh issue...</p><p></p><p>A full refresh only happens when the PCs get a full rest back in town. When they're out adventuring -- sleeping in the woods or in a labyrinthine crypt -- they only recover their Bloodied score in HPs (up to their max) and their Con bonus +1 in Healing Surges (again up to their max). Oh, and their Action Point.</p><p></p><p>Believe me, that's all you'll really need for grit.</p><p></p><p>I planned on allowing a full refresh during an extended rest once per adventure, following a PC-narrated Flashback or some sort of tale about their past and why they're in the dungeon. But that was for flavor and to lessen (somewhat) the effect of not having a full refresh every day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smathis, post: 4291118, member: 56465"] All around bad idea. Completely blows the balance of the game out of the water -- in terms of character-to-character and PCs-to-Monsters. What is it you want to keep from 4e that you're interested in gutting 25-30% of the PHB? No need. Basic algebra here. If I subtract 15% from starting HP and monster HP, what am I gaining? A zero sum. If you want combats to be shorter, I have three words for you... Exploding. Damage. Dice. It would throw off the balance some but in a way that would be fun. And it would be easy to mitigate or scale down -- only one damage die in a roll explodes, player chooses. That and lethality would go through the roof -- which seems to be where you're going with this... Unnecessary. I'd go with 4d6, drop the lowest or the standard arrays. No need to gank the PCs out of the gate like this. 4d6, dropping the lowest, will produce wide enough fluctuations that you'd still get some pretty odd scores --- like a PC with 2 18s or a 5 and a 6. I'm inclined to pass on a suggestion from Mearls' blog where he states that giving all PCs 10 pts of GURPS disadvantages is a nice touch. I tend to agree. No one ever plays a 6 Cha or an 8 Int. At least no one I've ever known who used them as a dump stat. But if they have the disad "Likes to Gamble" or "Dark Secret". Yeah, those are the ones that tend to make it to the table. Basically, removing the powers is akin to removing Magic Items in 3e. A complete rewrite. Reference: Iron Heroes. There are better ways to go without a grid in 4e. The real trick is to figure out what all this forced movement and shifting translates to in your head. I mean, this powers say that you can move 2 squares before an attack and such. But what does that mean? How would a PC or monster use that to advantage? Once those things are understood, 4e is no more difficult to run without a grid than 3e. And if you follow the "Say Yes" advice in the DMG, you'll run into significantly fewer headaches. More here [url]http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=4112306&postcount=25[/url] I have the same problem with Identify, Magic Items and Residuum. In fact, I've had a problem with the Magic Item Economy since it was brought to the forefront in 3e. Basically, I plan to treat Residuum as the D&D equivalent of Deadlands' Ghost Rock. I plan to be traipsing around in the Wilderlands of High Fantasy so that's not a big deal for me. They have a similar substance called "Magicum". I want to give Magic Items the Stormbringer treatment. Basically an item grows in power with you. So a Paladin may pick up a magic sword at 1st level. But by the time he reaches 25th the sword will be a Holy Avenger. I reviewed the Magic Items last night and this doesn't look too hard. Neither does completely removing Magic Items and just giving the PCs a straight bonus to Attacks and Defenses (AC too) at all the levels divisible by 5. I'd also throw an extra d6 per tier on crits too. But that's me being nice. Yeah. This will suck more than you realize. I know that 4e PCs [i]look[/i] uber from the perspective of previous editions. But they're [i]not[/i]. If you want gritty and desperate combat... Every time a PC is dropped below zero they lose a Healing Surge. Ouch. Every time a PC fails a Death Save, the total surges they can have are lowered by one until they can make it back to town and rest up. Those are your wounds right there. I'm not sure I'll be using either of those variants, though. I think they'd just be too rough. Here's how I planned to handle the full refresh issue... A full refresh only happens when the PCs get a full rest back in town. When they're out adventuring -- sleeping in the woods or in a labyrinthine crypt -- they only recover their Bloodied score in HPs (up to their max) and their Con bonus +1 in Healing Surges (again up to their max). Oh, and their Action Point. Believe me, that's all you'll really need for grit. I planned on allowing a full refresh during an extended rest once per adventure, following a PC-narrated Flashback or some sort of tale about their past and why they're in the dungeon. But that was for flavor and to lessen (somewhat) the effect of not having a full refresh every day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Fixing 4e
Top