Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Fixing 5E] Saving Throws - Fortitude Reflex Will
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tormyr" data-source="post: 6929065" data-attributes="member: 6776887"><p>I am a little late to the party on this, but I am a bit surprised that no one has brought up all of the ways that a PC can cope with a high DC saving throw that they do not have proficiency in. 5e is designed for PCs to excel in dealing with some things while others things are a real danger. Having a low saving throw in some areas is part of what the game was designed around. While the high DC is difficult, there are so many ways of dealing with the high DCs of difficult creatures than just watching failed saving throws. These exist specifically to help PCs with the saving throws they struggle with.</p><p></p><p>A very partial list:</p><p>Barbarians have advantage on Dex</p><p>Bards give inspiration dice</p><p>Clerics cast <em>bless</em></p><p>Fighters have reroll failed saving throws</p><p>Monks have proficiency in all saving throws</p><p>Paladins give a bonus to saving throws to everyone around them</p><p>Rogues get proficiency in Dex, Int, and Wis</p><p>Divination wizard sets a die to one of the 3 rolled at the beginning of the day.</p><p>Halflings have lucky</p><p>Lucky feat gives a re-roll</p><p>Resilient feat grants proficiency</p><p>Heroes Feast gives advantage on wisdom saving throws</p><p>Ability Score Increases can add a +1</p><p></p><p>Even then, a PC with up to a +0 in a saving throw after all of that will still fail against an Ancient Dragon's DC of 24, the Goristro's DC 21 saving throw or any number of other monsters with high DCs. However, the PCs still have other means of dealing with that aside from making a saving throw (working off these from memory so some might be slightly off). Another small list:</p><p>Barbarians have immunity to charm and resistance to damage while raging</p><p>Monks have immunity to poison and disease</p><p>Ancients Paladin gives resistance to damage from spells</p><p>Mind blank protects from charm</p><p>Forcecage, wall of force, banishment, resilient sphere, maze, etc. all provide a respite from a particularly dangerous monster</p><p>Dispel magic and counterspell stop spells that are causing problems for someone</p><p>Healing damage taken</p><p>Means of bringing PCs back to life.</p><p></p><p>Respectfully, the game provides so many ways to improve a low saving throw and mitigate the damage from a failed saving throw that the low saving throws that PCs having some saving throws they will never be able to make <strong><em>solely through a single d20 roll</em></strong> is a non-issue. The system does not break down against high saving throw DCs because the system is about more than that single d20 roll.</p><p></p><p>My party has been level 15 or higher for all of 2016. Next week they hit level 20. While most of the high DCs they have run up against are in the 19-20 range, that is still extremely difficult for someone with a +0 or +1. They have also fought and killed an ancient green dragon, an ancient blue dragon while fighting off 2 adult blue dragons, a fang dragon, and fought off an ancient red. They killed a lich with a robe of the magi. In the entire campaign, there has been one permanent PC death, and that came a month and a half ago against a creature with DC 18 saving throws when a PC failed his saving throw and got separated while the party dealt with something else.</p><p></p><p>Improving PC saving throws by scrunching them down to 3 options has several knock on effects</p><p>* It makes it easier for a PC to make some saving throws, but it does not ensure the originally stated goal of having no low saving throw bonuses. Certain class combinations can still have a +0 in places. Even a +3 from ability modifiers is basically useless against a DC 24 from an ancient dragon: Barbarians and Fighters can have low will saves; Bards and rogues can have low fort; clerics, druids, warlocks, and wizards can have low fort and reflex; paladins can have low reflex and fort; sorcerers can have low reflex.</p><p>* Because it is easier for a PC to min/max good saving throw bonuses in all saving throws (reflex, fort, will), it reduces the special nature of the monk's class feature to have proficiency in all saving throws.</p><p>* Because it is easier for a PC to min/max good saving throw bonuses in all saving throws (reflex, fort, will), the CR of any creature that primarily uses saving throws to attack is effectively reduced (not just the high-level ones).</p><p>* It takes away the specialization that saving throws generally have in this edition: STR to not be pushed around, DEX to dodge out of the way, CON to resist the effects against the body (poison, cold, etc.), INT to not be fooled/resist psionic, WIS to keep control of the mind, CHA to maintain wholeness of self (banishment)</p><p>* It causes odd interactions with class features. Evasion now works with a high reflex saving throw granted by a high strength score. The barbarian has advantage on reflex saving throws boosted by its strength score.</p><p>* It puts the spotlight on saving throws and ignores super high attack bonuses from high level monsters. It seems odd that low saving throw bonuses are addressed but low AC is not. A +17 to hit will almost never miss someone without magical items, heavy armor and a shield, or monk or barbarian.</p><p></p><p>tl;dr - This solution does not necessarily provide what I understand the desired result to be (no low saving throw bonuses) without min/max, reduces the danger of monsters that use saving throws but not those that use attack rolls, and has odd interactions with other parts of 5e.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tormyr, post: 6929065, member: 6776887"] I am a little late to the party on this, but I am a bit surprised that no one has brought up all of the ways that a PC can cope with a high DC saving throw that they do not have proficiency in. 5e is designed for PCs to excel in dealing with some things while others things are a real danger. Having a low saving throw in some areas is part of what the game was designed around. While the high DC is difficult, there are so many ways of dealing with the high DCs of difficult creatures than just watching failed saving throws. These exist specifically to help PCs with the saving throws they struggle with. A very partial list: Barbarians have advantage on Dex Bards give inspiration dice Clerics cast [I]bless[/I] Fighters have reroll failed saving throws Monks have proficiency in all saving throws Paladins give a bonus to saving throws to everyone around them Rogues get proficiency in Dex, Int, and Wis Divination wizard sets a die to one of the 3 rolled at the beginning of the day. Halflings have lucky Lucky feat gives a re-roll Resilient feat grants proficiency Heroes Feast gives advantage on wisdom saving throws Ability Score Increases can add a +1 Even then, a PC with up to a +0 in a saving throw after all of that will still fail against an Ancient Dragon's DC of 24, the Goristro's DC 21 saving throw or any number of other monsters with high DCs. However, the PCs still have other means of dealing with that aside from making a saving throw (working off these from memory so some might be slightly off). Another small list: Barbarians have immunity to charm and resistance to damage while raging Monks have immunity to poison and disease Ancients Paladin gives resistance to damage from spells Mind blank protects from charm Forcecage, wall of force, banishment, resilient sphere, maze, etc. all provide a respite from a particularly dangerous monster Dispel magic and counterspell stop spells that are causing problems for someone Healing damage taken Means of bringing PCs back to life. Respectfully, the game provides so many ways to improve a low saving throw and mitigate the damage from a failed saving throw that the low saving throws that PCs having some saving throws they will never be able to make [B][I]solely through a single d20 roll[/I][/B] is a non-issue. The system does not break down against high saving throw DCs because the system is about more than that single d20 roll. My party has been level 15 or higher for all of 2016. Next week they hit level 20. While most of the high DCs they have run up against are in the 19-20 range, that is still extremely difficult for someone with a +0 or +1. They have also fought and killed an ancient green dragon, an ancient blue dragon while fighting off 2 adult blue dragons, a fang dragon, and fought off an ancient red. They killed a lich with a robe of the magi. In the entire campaign, there has been one permanent PC death, and that came a month and a half ago against a creature with DC 18 saving throws when a PC failed his saving throw and got separated while the party dealt with something else. Improving PC saving throws by scrunching them down to 3 options has several knock on effects * It makes it easier for a PC to make some saving throws, but it does not ensure the originally stated goal of having no low saving throw bonuses. Certain class combinations can still have a +0 in places. Even a +3 from ability modifiers is basically useless against a DC 24 from an ancient dragon: Barbarians and Fighters can have low will saves; Bards and rogues can have low fort; clerics, druids, warlocks, and wizards can have low fort and reflex; paladins can have low reflex and fort; sorcerers can have low reflex. * Because it is easier for a PC to min/max good saving throw bonuses in all saving throws (reflex, fort, will), it reduces the special nature of the monk's class feature to have proficiency in all saving throws. * Because it is easier for a PC to min/max good saving throw bonuses in all saving throws (reflex, fort, will), the CR of any creature that primarily uses saving throws to attack is effectively reduced (not just the high-level ones). * It takes away the specialization that saving throws generally have in this edition: STR to not be pushed around, DEX to dodge out of the way, CON to resist the effects against the body (poison, cold, etc.), INT to not be fooled/resist psionic, WIS to keep control of the mind, CHA to maintain wholeness of self (banishment) * It causes odd interactions with class features. Evasion now works with a high reflex saving throw granted by a high strength score. The barbarian has advantage on reflex saving throws boosted by its strength score. * It puts the spotlight on saving throws and ignores super high attack bonuses from high level monsters. It seems odd that low saving throw bonuses are addressed but low AC is not. A +17 to hit will almost never miss someone without magical items, heavy armor and a shield, or monk or barbarian. tl;dr - This solution does not necessarily provide what I understand the desired result to be (no low saving throw bonuses) without min/max, reduces the danger of monsters that use saving throws but not those that use attack rolls, and has odd interactions with other parts of 5e. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Fixing 5E] Saving Throws - Fortitude Reflex Will
Top