Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fixing Challenge Rating
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shardstone" data-source="post: 9247550" data-attributes="member: 6807784"><p>I mean no disrespect by this, but I think you have completely misunderstood my post. What I said and what you are responding to are completely different messages.</p><p></p><p>I do not think they are seperate forces (Maths and Creativity), and my argument isn't that CR gets in the way of creative monsters. My argument is that CR does not describe anything that you can relate to beyond "Is this creature 95% likely to TPK my party" or "Can I expect a harder fighter then fighting 3 mooks in a box" etc etc. Furthermore, knowing that 10% resources can be used doesn't make sense because every class has different resources used in different ways, and some classes have no resources other than HP and HD (rogue) vs two or more resources (Sorcerer, Cleric, Druid). Furthermore, various features give their own independent pools of uses instead of sharing a pool. On top of that, not all resources are equal; a high level spell slot is worth a lot more than a 1st level spell slot. So if I'm playing a FIghter Champion and someone is playing a Fighter Battlemaster, how can we create a definition of resources that fits both? </p><p></p><p>Furthermore, monsters like the Lich only match their CR in specific instances and when played in specific ways. This applies very often to other creatively designed monsters (I know this since I also do design work). Therefore, you can never be quite sure if this creature will use X amount of your resources or not.</p><p></p><p>So not only is the term "resources" difficult to pragmatically define, but non-standard monsters (and what monster over CR 10 or 15 is really standard?) cannot be accurately described under a CR using "resources" as a framework. </p><p></p><p>If we got more specific and said JUST Hit Points, it could make more sense, though we'd still need two kinds of CR -- one to describe something "standard" and one to describe something "nonstandard." The shadow doesn't threaten your hit points all that much, but boy does it threaten your strength and thus your life. And what resource can help you replace your strength? Or is the resource I'm counting something more esoteric?</p><p></p><p>To [USER=697]@mearls[/USER] -- I'm not saying this to stop your project. In fact, I want you to continue it, because I think it's fascinating and can lead to a lot of cool ideas. But I really do think a pragmatic definition of resources needs to be interrogated again (as I'm sure you've thought about this a lot already) because right now, I don't know how to quantify resources given how D&D classes function.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shardstone, post: 9247550, member: 6807784"] I mean no disrespect by this, but I think you have completely misunderstood my post. What I said and what you are responding to are completely different messages. I do not think they are seperate forces (Maths and Creativity), and my argument isn't that CR gets in the way of creative monsters. My argument is that CR does not describe anything that you can relate to beyond "Is this creature 95% likely to TPK my party" or "Can I expect a harder fighter then fighting 3 mooks in a box" etc etc. Furthermore, knowing that 10% resources can be used doesn't make sense because every class has different resources used in different ways, and some classes have no resources other than HP and HD (rogue) vs two or more resources (Sorcerer, Cleric, Druid). Furthermore, various features give their own independent pools of uses instead of sharing a pool. On top of that, not all resources are equal; a high level spell slot is worth a lot more than a 1st level spell slot. So if I'm playing a FIghter Champion and someone is playing a Fighter Battlemaster, how can we create a definition of resources that fits both? Furthermore, monsters like the Lich only match their CR in specific instances and when played in specific ways. This applies very often to other creatively designed monsters (I know this since I also do design work). Therefore, you can never be quite sure if this creature will use X amount of your resources or not. So not only is the term "resources" difficult to pragmatically define, but non-standard monsters (and what monster over CR 10 or 15 is really standard?) cannot be accurately described under a CR using "resources" as a framework. If we got more specific and said JUST Hit Points, it could make more sense, though we'd still need two kinds of CR -- one to describe something "standard" and one to describe something "nonstandard." The shadow doesn't threaten your hit points all that much, but boy does it threaten your strength and thus your life. And what resource can help you replace your strength? Or is the resource I'm counting something more esoteric? To [USER=697]@mearls[/USER] -- I'm not saying this to stop your project. In fact, I want you to continue it, because I think it's fascinating and can lead to a lot of cool ideas. But I really do think a pragmatic definition of resources needs to be interrogated again (as I'm sure you've thought about this a lot already) because right now, I don't know how to quantify resources given how D&D classes function. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fixing Challenge Rating
Top