Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fixing Challenge Rating
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tomedunn" data-source="post: 9285638" data-attributes="member: 7040979"><p>It's not that more actions make you dangerous, it's that monsters in groups live longer than a single monster alone. There are benefits to having more actions, but those are smaller orders effects to what's driving the difficulty change when grouping monsters.</p><p></p><p>This is why referring to this effect as a result of the "action economy" is a bit of a misnomer. The effect correlates with changes in action economy, but it's not caused by it.</p><p></p><p>Also, while 5e's encounter building math is centered around encounters with only a single monster, that's simply a matter of presentation and not a reflection of any underlying assumptions on how the game functions (at least, none that I've come across in my research). It could easily be recentered around one monster per PC without changing the underlying math.</p><p></p><p>In fact, this is exactly what the alternative encounter building rules in XGtE do. As I show in <a href="https://tomedunn.github.io/the-finished-book/theory/xgte-encounter-building/" target="_blank">my analysis of those rules</a>, you can derive all of the values in that book from the math in the DMG. Presenting the math in that way doesn't remove the encounter multiplier, it just reduces the size of the error you incur for ignoring it.</p><p></p><p>The encounter build rules used in 5e aren't built around measuring how likely an encounter is to result in a TPK. They're built around estimating the average damage the PCs are likely to take relative to their maximum HP.</p><p></p><p>Two encounters with the same adjusted XP values should, on average, deal similar amounts of damage to the party. That doesn't mean their outcomes will have similar distributions, just that the averages of those distributions will be similar. An encounter with more actions will have a tighter distribution than one with fewer, and will be less likely to cause a TPK as a result, but the average strain on the party will still be similar between the two.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tomedunn, post: 9285638, member: 7040979"] It's not that more actions make you dangerous, it's that monsters in groups live longer than a single monster alone. There are benefits to having more actions, but those are smaller orders effects to what's driving the difficulty change when grouping monsters. This is why referring to this effect as a result of the "action economy" is a bit of a misnomer. The effect correlates with changes in action economy, but it's not caused by it. Also, while 5e's encounter building math is centered around encounters with only a single monster, that's simply a matter of presentation and not a reflection of any underlying assumptions on how the game functions (at least, none that I've come across in my research). It could easily be recentered around one monster per PC without changing the underlying math. In fact, this is exactly what the alternative encounter building rules in XGtE do. As I show in [URL='https://tomedunn.github.io/the-finished-book/theory/xgte-encounter-building/']my analysis of those rules[/URL], you can derive all of the values in that book from the math in the DMG. Presenting the math in that way doesn't remove the encounter multiplier, it just reduces the size of the error you incur for ignoring it. The encounter build rules used in 5e aren't built around measuring how likely an encounter is to result in a TPK. They're built around estimating the average damage the PCs are likely to take relative to their maximum HP. Two encounters with the same adjusted XP values should, on average, deal similar amounts of damage to the party. That doesn't mean their outcomes will have similar distributions, just that the averages of those distributions will be similar. An encounter with more actions will have a tighter distribution than one with fewer, and will be less likely to cause a TPK as a result, but the average strain on the party will still be similar between the two. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fixing Challenge Rating
Top