Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 5490909" data-attributes="member: 20741">Not so far.I honestly hope Pathfinder would not be used to create a future game or modern setting. I think SW:SE's base ruleset is far better at achieving that sort of gameplay than Pathfinder is.Now, if Owen K. Stephen's plan all along was to &quot;Saga Editionize&quot; Pathfinder for its d20Future/Modern version under the OGL -- then I take all that back. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :P"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />To date, however, that intention was never made expressly clear to me, and never has been. Gary Sarli's efforts, on the other hand, were clearly more aimed at renovating the SW:SE's mechanics into a more fulsome modern/future RPG system under the OGL.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 5490909, member: 20741"] Not so far. I honestly hope Pathfinder would not be used to create a future game or modern setting. I think SW:SE's base ruleset is far better at achieving that sort of gameplay than Pathfinder is. Now, if Owen K. Stephen's plan all along was to "Saga Editionize" Pathfinder for its d20Future/Modern version under the OGL -- then I take all that back. :P To date, however, that intention was never made expressly clear to me, and never has been. Gary Sarli's efforts, on the other hand, were clearly more aimed at renovating the SW:SE's mechanics into a more fulsome modern/future RPG system under the OGL. [/QUOTE]

Verification