Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
fixing feint
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nonsi256" data-source="post: 5044054" data-attributes="member: 86164"><p>Ok, coutering Feint with Intimidate is just something I find too hard to swallow.</p><p>Also, Cocentration is all about patience... and I see no reason in the world why a wizard would have any practical practice at negatng feinting attempts.</p><p></p><p>As for your experience... fencing practice is quite different from RL combat. You're not afraid of actually getting hurt (other than a sprung ankle) so you're ok with over taxing yourself (there's counter-tactics to feinting - catching your opponent off-guard just as he feints).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I also think you missed the point in my explanation.</p><p>For a mere mortal, BAB probably culminates at +3, making it the least significant factor in feinting.</p><p>Now, given that:</p><p>1. Cha is a measure of one's general persuasiveness and Wis is a measure of one's general perceptive capabilities & attantion.</p><p>2. High enough Bluff & Sense Motive involve body language to a certain degree.</p><p>3. High BAB means a helluvalot combat practice.</p><p>4. Non-bipeds don't have a manageable biomechanics.</p><p>5. Low-Int oppenents hardly defend themselves and 0-Int opponents don't defend at all.</p><p>Things boil down to make my suggeted Feint check (and notes) quite reliable.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As for your suggestions for the general mechanics - I couldn't agree more.</p><p>Here's how I think it should be done (tell me what you think of it):</p><p></p><p>- Feint is a move action to begin with.</p><p>- A successful Feint renders your opponent flatfooted in regards to the augmented attack.</p><p>- If you can make a sequence of more than a single attack (whether or not as a full attack), you can attempt (using the Feint option) to augment one of your attacks by spending your next attack. The Feint check is rolled using the AB of the attack you’re attempting to augment. For instance, suppose you have +11/+6/+1 sequence available. If you wish to augment your primary attack (+11), you lose your secondary attack (+6), but you make your Feint check at +11. You could instead choose to augment your secondary attack (making the Feint check at +6) by trading your tertiary attack.</p><p>- Improved Feint grants +4 to all opposed Feint checks - both offensive and defensive.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The description may seem somewhat clunky, but:</p><p>1. The actual execution is quite simple.</p><p>2. This mechanic is meant to make Feint a tactical option one would consider whether to use or not (and when) – not a dead option or a “you have to be brain dead not to use it” option. It all depends on your odds of nailing a specific attack. If the next one is almost a sure miss, why not put it to a better use.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nonsi256, post: 5044054, member: 86164"] Ok, coutering Feint with Intimidate is just something I find too hard to swallow. Also, Cocentration is all about patience... and I see no reason in the world why a wizard would have any practical practice at negatng feinting attempts. As for your experience... fencing practice is quite different from RL combat. You're not afraid of actually getting hurt (other than a sprung ankle) so you're ok with over taxing yourself (there's counter-tactics to feinting - catching your opponent off-guard just as he feints). I also think you missed the point in my explanation. For a mere mortal, BAB probably culminates at +3, making it the least significant factor in feinting. Now, given that: 1. Cha is a measure of one's general persuasiveness and Wis is a measure of one's general perceptive capabilities & attantion. 2. High enough Bluff & Sense Motive involve body language to a certain degree. 3. High BAB means a helluvalot combat practice. 4. Non-bipeds don't have a manageable biomechanics. 5. Low-Int oppenents hardly defend themselves and 0-Int opponents don't defend at all. Things boil down to make my suggeted Feint check (and notes) quite reliable. As for your suggestions for the general mechanics - I couldn't agree more. Here's how I think it should be done (tell me what you think of it): - Feint is a move action to begin with. - A successful Feint renders your opponent flatfooted in regards to the augmented attack. - If you can make a sequence of more than a single attack (whether or not as a full attack), you can attempt (using the Feint option) to augment one of your attacks by spending your next attack. The Feint check is rolled using the AB of the attack you’re attempting to augment. For instance, suppose you have +11/+6/+1 sequence available. If you wish to augment your primary attack (+11), you lose your secondary attack (+6), but you make your Feint check at +11. You could instead choose to augment your secondary attack (making the Feint check at +6) by trading your tertiary attack. - Improved Feint grants +4 to all opposed Feint checks - both offensive and defensive. The description may seem somewhat clunky, but: 1. The actual execution is quite simple. 2. This mechanic is meant to make Feint a tactical option one would consider whether to use or not (and when) – not a dead option or a “you have to be brain dead not to use it” option. It all depends on your odds of nailing a specific attack. If the next one is almost a sure miss, why not put it to a better use. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
fixing feint
Top