Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing Magic Missile
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Morris" data-source="post: 1100515" data-attributes="member: 87"><p>Damage caps are an inaccurate way of describing the limitations of the spells at each level. Magic missile is fine an is for it's level - it just lacks a true "rival" spell (whereas <em>fireball</em> is rivalled by <em>lightning bolt</em>). I've been studying the spells quite intently as of late looking for patterns to try to bring the system closer together without massive rewrites. Changing one of the games signature spells, in any way, qualifies as a major rewrite and something that turns me away from both products and game tables. I want to play D&D, not Joe Bob's RPG.</p><p></p><p>Magic missile has an average damage yield of 3.5 per missile, maxing out at 17.5. Shocking Grasp also has a yield of 3.5 / level to a max of 17.5. Because the dice are different the spreads are different - 10-25 for magic missile and 5-30 for Shocking grasp. A maximized grasp does more damage than magic missile.</p><p></p><p>If you use the feat energy substitution from Tome & Blood, you can modify shocking grasp in order to deal double damage on many types of creatures. Magic missile can't be done this way.</p><p></p><p>Magic missile is akin to an officer's pistol - especially at higher levels. A high level caster reduced to using this spell is already in serious trouble (if he wasn't he'd use something more effective like cloud kill et. al). Each magic missile deals damage comparable to an arrow without any strength bonuses. Yes, it always hits - but a well honed archer type character rarely misses either and can deal a lot more damage for a lot longer than magic missile using standard issue arrows (add magic arrows to the mix and it gets to be even more fun).</p><p></p><p>I have my doubts about rewriting spells unless there are serious issues with them. Magic missile has issues - it's borderline 1st & 2nd I'll admit - but we don't have level 1.5 spells so it's always dropped to 1st. A class with the spell at 2nd level would be nice if only to show that the spell is still servicable at 2nd level. Wizards and sorcerers need the spell if only for them melee isn't an option.</p><p></p><p>A better fix to magic missile than your's nift is to use the playtest version of magic missile everyone hated so much. It deals 1d6 / missile and allows a reflex save for 1/2 damage. This has the same average damage BEFORE save, and considerably less after.</p><p></p><p>Nerfing benchmark spells won't work Nifft. There will ALWAYS be some spells that are better than others at all levels. Magic missile is an obvious case (maybe too obvious), but all levels feature this. If magic missile is removed from first choice contention, another spell will take it's place. What then, nerf it too? Before long your spell casters will be better off throwing rocks and shooting arrows at folks.</p><p></p><p>My only real problem with magic missile is that it doesn't have a rival spell - it's a no brainer. Rather than nerf magic missile, I developed a spell that competes with it for the honor of "Best 1st level damage dealing spell." You'll get to see that spell in Art of Magic when it comes out next year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Morris, post: 1100515, member: 87"] Damage caps are an inaccurate way of describing the limitations of the spells at each level. Magic missile is fine an is for it's level - it just lacks a true "rival" spell (whereas [i]fireball[/i] is rivalled by [i]lightning bolt[/i]). I've been studying the spells quite intently as of late looking for patterns to try to bring the system closer together without massive rewrites. Changing one of the games signature spells, in any way, qualifies as a major rewrite and something that turns me away from both products and game tables. I want to play D&D, not Joe Bob's RPG. Magic missile has an average damage yield of 3.5 per missile, maxing out at 17.5. Shocking Grasp also has a yield of 3.5 / level to a max of 17.5. Because the dice are different the spreads are different - 10-25 for magic missile and 5-30 for Shocking grasp. A maximized grasp does more damage than magic missile. If you use the feat energy substitution from Tome & Blood, you can modify shocking grasp in order to deal double damage on many types of creatures. Magic missile can't be done this way. Magic missile is akin to an officer's pistol - especially at higher levels. A high level caster reduced to using this spell is already in serious trouble (if he wasn't he'd use something more effective like cloud kill et. al). Each magic missile deals damage comparable to an arrow without any strength bonuses. Yes, it always hits - but a well honed archer type character rarely misses either and can deal a lot more damage for a lot longer than magic missile using standard issue arrows (add magic arrows to the mix and it gets to be even more fun). I have my doubts about rewriting spells unless there are serious issues with them. Magic missile has issues - it's borderline 1st & 2nd I'll admit - but we don't have level 1.5 spells so it's always dropped to 1st. A class with the spell at 2nd level would be nice if only to show that the spell is still servicable at 2nd level. Wizards and sorcerers need the spell if only for them melee isn't an option. A better fix to magic missile than your's nift is to use the playtest version of magic missile everyone hated so much. It deals 1d6 / missile and allows a reflex save for 1/2 damage. This has the same average damage BEFORE save, and considerably less after. Nerfing benchmark spells won't work Nifft. There will ALWAYS be some spells that are better than others at all levels. Magic missile is an obvious case (maybe too obvious), but all levels feature this. If magic missile is removed from first choice contention, another spell will take it's place. What then, nerf it too? Before long your spell casters will be better off throwing rocks and shooting arrows at folks. My only real problem with magic missile is that it doesn't have a rival spell - it's a no brainer. Rather than nerf magic missile, I developed a spell that competes with it for the honor of "Best 1st level damage dealing spell." You'll get to see that spell in Art of Magic when it comes out next year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing Magic Missile
Top