Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing Polymorph/Wildshape by using ECL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 1305835" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>I'm working on house rules to fix polymorph/wildshape. I'd like some input if you have the time.</p><p></p><p>The basic idea would be to alter polymorph/wildshape so that it looks at ECL instead of at hit dice to check and see if a form is available. The idea behind this change is that ECL is a better gauge of balance than HD. </p><p></p><p>When I began working on this idea, I was faced with the problem that many creatures in the MM and other books do not have ECLs. Further, many of the ECLs present seemed to be off target. So, beyond reworking polymorph, I needed to rework ECLs as well for my idea to fly. </p><p></p><p>After some reflection, I realized that the major flaw with the ECL system is that some abilities are too strong to be in the hands of PCs beneath a certain level, regardless of other benefits or burdens from the form of the creature. For instance, a natural strength in the high 20s is too strong to be in the hands of an 8th level party. When an 8th level druid wild shapes into a brown bear with 28 strength, he is doing more damage than a pure melee fighter of equivalent level. The answer to this problem was to assign minimum ECLs for strong abilities. For instance a minimum ECL for a strength of 28 might be 12.</p><p></p><p>The next problem dealt with supernatural and spell-like abilities. These are often a large part of ECL for powerful creatures. If I used the plain ECL for the creature to limit forms, some ECLs would be ridiculously too high. The obvious answer was to assign a creature two ECLs: One with all the abilities (normal ECL) and a Modified Effective Character Level (MECL) that was calculated as if the form had no supernatural or spell-like abilities. A third category for Supernatural Modified Effective Character Level (SMECL) for the presence of Supernatural abilities, but not Spell-like abilities, was also created for use with Shapechange.</p><p></p><p>By using this approach, I can allow a polymorpher/wildshaper to gain special qualities as well as special attacks. The only remaining issue, other than getting a full series of ECLs, MECLs and SMECLs is with the blending of the retained abilities from the natural form of the caster with the abilities gained by the new form. If we restrict the ECL, MECL or SMECL to less than the level/ECL of the being changing shape, it gives us some room to account for the extra benefits of merging the two forms.</p><p></p><p>What I ended up with:</p><p></p><p>Polymorph/wildshape allows you to assume a form with a MECL (ECL without supernatural or spell-like abilities) less than the caster level of the caster and less than the ECL of the target. You gain no supernatural or spell-like abilities, but gain all other abilities of the form (including bonus feats, skill bonuses, etc ...)</p><p></p><p>Shapechange allows you to asume a form with a SMECL (ECL without spell-like abilities) less than your caster level. You gain no spell-like abilities, but gain everything else.</p><p></p><p>How does that sound? Any huge flaws that you see?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 1305835, member: 2629"] I'm working on house rules to fix polymorph/wildshape. I'd like some input if you have the time. The basic idea would be to alter polymorph/wildshape so that it looks at ECL instead of at hit dice to check and see if a form is available. The idea behind this change is that ECL is a better gauge of balance than HD. When I began working on this idea, I was faced with the problem that many creatures in the MM and other books do not have ECLs. Further, many of the ECLs present seemed to be off target. So, beyond reworking polymorph, I needed to rework ECLs as well for my idea to fly. After some reflection, I realized that the major flaw with the ECL system is that some abilities are too strong to be in the hands of PCs beneath a certain level, regardless of other benefits or burdens from the form of the creature. For instance, a natural strength in the high 20s is too strong to be in the hands of an 8th level party. When an 8th level druid wild shapes into a brown bear with 28 strength, he is doing more damage than a pure melee fighter of equivalent level. The answer to this problem was to assign minimum ECLs for strong abilities. For instance a minimum ECL for a strength of 28 might be 12. The next problem dealt with supernatural and spell-like abilities. These are often a large part of ECL for powerful creatures. If I used the plain ECL for the creature to limit forms, some ECLs would be ridiculously too high. The obvious answer was to assign a creature two ECLs: One with all the abilities (normal ECL) and a Modified Effective Character Level (MECL) that was calculated as if the form had no supernatural or spell-like abilities. A third category for Supernatural Modified Effective Character Level (SMECL) for the presence of Supernatural abilities, but not Spell-like abilities, was also created for use with Shapechange. By using this approach, I can allow a polymorpher/wildshaper to gain special qualities as well as special attacks. The only remaining issue, other than getting a full series of ECLs, MECLs and SMECLs is with the blending of the retained abilities from the natural form of the caster with the abilities gained by the new form. If we restrict the ECL, MECL or SMECL to less than the level/ECL of the being changing shape, it gives us some room to account for the extra benefits of merging the two forms. What I ended up with: Polymorph/wildshape allows you to assume a form with a MECL (ECL without supernatural or spell-like abilities) less than the caster level of the caster and less than the ECL of the target. You gain no supernatural or spell-like abilities, but gain all other abilities of the form (including bonus feats, skill bonuses, etc ...) Shapechange allows you to asume a form with a SMECL (ECL without spell-like abilities) less than your caster level. You gain no spell-like abilities, but gain everything else. How does that sound? Any huge flaws that you see? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing Polymorph/Wildshape by using ECL
Top