Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fixing the Fighter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6068680" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>All respect to Obryn, I don't see how that could be fiat. Its not fiat any more than a Wizard casting a single target attack spell, rolling to hit, and doing damage. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Precisely. This is fiat. That is what my posts outlined. There is no metagame leveraged in interfacing with the basic attack system.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wow. You have not been keeping score if that is your sense of things. In this very thread its readily available (amongst dozens others that you have been a part of). Its connotation is irrelevant. Its a very real thing. Its my understanding that you are not of age to have been playing D&D before 3e. As such, its highly unlikely that you've been saturated by the D&D culture's intense antipathy for metagame play from the late 80s with the "Dragonlancing" of AD&D. Saying that the greater D&D culture has had a visceral reaction to metagaming from 2e onward is akin to saying "water is wet." I mean, this isn't even controversial. A considerable portion of the anti-4e sentiment is an exact byproduct of 4e's friendliness toward the metagame; and you can see it in this thread writ large (and plenty of others that you have participated in). I'm a bit baffled at your response here. What I wrote isn't even close to provocation. Its blatant truth. It doesn't mean that being antagonistic toward the metagame is badwrongfun...nor does it mean that endorsing it is goodrightawesome. Its just categorically true of the D&D culture.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, the response of "Because I want to" which is observably and patently destructive to a table...is pretty self-evident; don't you think? I mean if you asked your player "How did you do that", what would you say to them when they belligerently proffer "Because I want to" as narrative justification/resolution for the action in question?</p><p></p><p>How you can compare those two is beyond me. Read the thread again (and any other thread regarding metagame mechanics/agenda) and tell me that D&D culture is not viscerally opposed to metagame play...demanding the tools that make it available to be excised from canon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6068680, member: 6696971"] All respect to Obryn, I don't see how that could be fiat. Its not fiat any more than a Wizard casting a single target attack spell, rolling to hit, and doing damage. Precisely. This is fiat. That is what my posts outlined. There is no metagame leveraged in interfacing with the basic attack system. Wow. You have not been keeping score if that is your sense of things. In this very thread its readily available (amongst dozens others that you have been a part of). Its connotation is irrelevant. Its a very real thing. Its my understanding that you are not of age to have been playing D&D before 3e. As such, its highly unlikely that you've been saturated by the D&D culture's intense antipathy for metagame play from the late 80s with the "Dragonlancing" of AD&D. Saying that the greater D&D culture has had a visceral reaction to metagaming from 2e onward is akin to saying "water is wet." I mean, this isn't even controversial. A considerable portion of the anti-4e sentiment is an exact byproduct of 4e's friendliness toward the metagame; and you can see it in this thread writ large (and plenty of others that you have participated in). I'm a bit baffled at your response here. What I wrote isn't even close to provocation. Its blatant truth. It doesn't mean that being antagonistic toward the metagame is badwrongfun...nor does it mean that endorsing it is goodrightawesome. Its just categorically true of the D&D culture. Meanwhile, the response of "Because I want to" which is observably and patently destructive to a table...is pretty self-evident; don't you think? I mean if you asked your player "How did you do that", what would you say to them when they belligerently proffer "Because I want to" as narrative justification/resolution for the action in question? How you can compare those two is beyond me. Read the thread again (and any other thread regarding metagame mechanics/agenda) and tell me that D&D culture is not viscerally opposed to metagame play...demanding the tools that make it available to be excised from canon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fixing the Fighter
Top