Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Obryn" data-source="post: 6070261" data-attributes="member: 11821">For (1) Yep, sure?&nbsp; The idea is that this can work alongside a spellcaster who's toned down a bit from 3.5.&nbsp; The idea is not to make Fighters better than casters; the idea is to make them not Tier 5 or 6.(2) The randomness is to address Remathilis's point about the same flow of combat every encounter.&nbsp; More or less - it's unpredictable what situations or opportunities will arise in any given fight.(3) Honestly, I think anything from Bo9S is a fine model; all three of the classes are pretty great.I like &quot;Badassdom Points&quot; for the record. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />But yes - much like with my own suggestion the devil's in the details, but that's another perfectly good basis for a resource system.-O</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Obryn, post: 6070261, member: 11821"] For (1) Yep, sure? The idea is that this can work alongside a spellcaster who's toned down a bit from 3.5. The idea is not to make Fighters better than casters; the idea is to make them not Tier 5 or 6. (2) The randomness is to address Remathilis's point about the same flow of combat every encounter. More or less - it's unpredictable what situations or opportunities will arise in any given fight. (3) Honestly, I think anything from Bo9S is a fine model; all three of the classes are pretty great. I like "Badassdom Points" for the record. ;) But yes - much like with my own suggestion the devil's in the details, but that's another perfectly good basis for a resource system. -O [/QUOTE]

Verification