Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing the Half Orc ('cause they're broken)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thia Halmades" data-source="post: 2654315" data-attributes="member: 35863"><p>So actually, I got there first (see thread one.) So... nyah. Nub the point, though. I see what Felix is saying; yes, Half-Orcs are a niche race, but I don't like niche races. That's me, and my strongly held opinion. Limited? Sure. Gimped? Not so much. I do thank everyone for their input, and I think Feldspar has some good ideas, but for me and my part:</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's the blend of Nyaricus & Li Shenron saying the same thing, and I agree with it. It keeps them "unsocial" without being effed on the CHA front. I also believe that they COULD develop Sorcerors, and it almost makes sense for them to do so.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Looking at the two side-by-side, I'll go with Feldspar on this one. It gives the flexibility I'm looking for without over-powering them, and reflecting my concept of "bred for war." My original concept in giving them Racial weapons was as a Racial Memory, and I may keep that for another campaign setting, but as a standing HR, the nod goes to Feldspar for balance and simplicity (I'm big on simplicity).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I can see removing Scent, but in terms of "no other race gets it" that's pretty much why I gave it to them. I see these people as animalistic, natural hunters close to their roots; a sentient species bred and ready for war at any given moment, capable of finding their targets under almost any circumstance. I gave it to them for that express purpose.</p><p></p><p>Endurance is my way of reflecting that they're simply hardier and tougher than most other races, without giving them the +2 CON (my original fix was simply to give them +2 CON and be done with it, but it was unbalanced the wrong way). And, by extension, if they get Endurance from elsewhere they automatically get Die Hard instead. Again, reflecting a warrior nature and a refusal to freakin' die. So that's being kept for my purposes.</p><p></p><p>Favored Class: Ranger. How close am I to saying "Fighter" instead? Quite. But I prefer the flexibility of Rangers and Fighter is a go-to class for everyone ANYWAY when it comes to war, and the stat boosts and ties to nature represent more how I view Orcs than how may be close-to-canon such as Barbarians. Almost seems like Barbarian is favored because they start off illiterate. Nonsense. If we're assuming that Half-Orcs are generally raised in society, then they're more inclined to be Rangers.</p><p></p><p>+2 Racial bonus to: Survival, Intimidate, Sense Motive</p><p></p><p>And ... yeah, that's it. For now. New thoughts?</p><p></p><p>LCpt. Thia Halmades</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thia Halmades, post: 2654315, member: 35863"] So actually, I got there first (see thread one.) So... nyah. Nub the point, though. I see what Felix is saying; yes, Half-Orcs are a niche race, but I don't like niche races. That's me, and my strongly held opinion. Limited? Sure. Gimped? Not so much. I do thank everyone for their input, and I think Feldspar has some good ideas, but for me and my part: That's the blend of Nyaricus & Li Shenron saying the same thing, and I agree with it. It keeps them "unsocial" without being effed on the CHA front. I also believe that they COULD develop Sorcerors, and it almost makes sense for them to do so. Looking at the two side-by-side, I'll go with Feldspar on this one. It gives the flexibility I'm looking for without over-powering them, and reflecting my concept of "bred for war." My original concept in giving them Racial weapons was as a Racial Memory, and I may keep that for another campaign setting, but as a standing HR, the nod goes to Feldspar for balance and simplicity (I'm big on simplicity). I can see removing Scent, but in terms of "no other race gets it" that's pretty much why I gave it to them. I see these people as animalistic, natural hunters close to their roots; a sentient species bred and ready for war at any given moment, capable of finding their targets under almost any circumstance. I gave it to them for that express purpose. Endurance is my way of reflecting that they're simply hardier and tougher than most other races, without giving them the +2 CON (my original fix was simply to give them +2 CON and be done with it, but it was unbalanced the wrong way). And, by extension, if they get Endurance from elsewhere they automatically get Die Hard instead. Again, reflecting a warrior nature and a refusal to freakin' die. So that's being kept for my purposes. Favored Class: Ranger. How close am I to saying "Fighter" instead? Quite. But I prefer the flexibility of Rangers and Fighter is a go-to class for everyone ANYWAY when it comes to war, and the stat boosts and ties to nature represent more how I view Orcs than how may be close-to-canon such as Barbarians. Almost seems like Barbarian is favored because they start off illiterate. Nonsense. If we're assuming that Half-Orcs are generally raised in society, then they're more inclined to be Rangers. +2 Racial bonus to: Survival, Intimidate, Sense Motive And ... yeah, that's it. For now. New thoughts? LCpt. Thia Halmades [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing the Half Orc ('cause they're broken)
Top