Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing the problems I have with UAs wound system
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="azmodean" data-source="post: 2066348" data-attributes="member: 26590"><p>I really like the flavor of Unearthed Arcana's wound system, but there are several problems I have with it that keeps me from using it. Here's a summary of the problems as I see them and what I've come up with to deal with them.</p><p></p><p>1. any hit that can deal you damage has a 1/20 chance of disabling you. (natural 1)</p><p> This is really a d20 problem, but using wounding rules would take it from manageable to insane. I have been thinking of switching to exploding d20s and that would help, but it still leaves a very high chance of being disabled with a single hit, even if the character is relatively high level. I was thinking of making everyone "tougher" by making the save against disable be at -15 from the base save instead of -10. (I just realised that action points would really help with this)</p><p></p><p>2. It is extremely difficult to deal any damage at all to very high-save creatures. once the save bonus reaches the 20 area, it takes very high damage to have a good chance of getting those first few hits in, which leads to another problem.</p><p></p><p>3. No matter how hard the hit, you never take more than a "wound", which is a piddly -1 on future saves. I was thinking of altering the results of failed saves as follows: if you miss by less than five you take a "light wound" for -1 to subsequent saves, if you miss by five to nine you take a "wound" for -2 to subsequent saves, if you miss by ten to fourteen you take a "serious wound" for -3 to subsequent saves, and if you miss by fifteen or more you are disabled.</p><p></p><p>4. Reducing variation of creature toughness. UA mentions it (basing the wound system on the fort save leaves only two alternatives to represent toughness, "Good" and "bad" saves), but I don't really see the problem. My solution is to make a seperate "wound save" and make 6 save progressions to replace the 6 hit die sizes. Con still provides the bonus to this save.</p><p>[code]</p><p>d4 = "bad" = 1/3 level = 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6</p><p>d6 = "medium" = 2/5 level = 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8</p><p>d8 = "medium +1" = 1 + 2/5 level = 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9</p><p>d10 = "good" = 2 + 1/2 level = 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12</p><p>d12 = "good + 1" = 3 + 1/2 level = 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13</p><p>[/code]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="azmodean, post: 2066348, member: 26590"] I really like the flavor of Unearthed Arcana's wound system, but there are several problems I have with it that keeps me from using it. Here's a summary of the problems as I see them and what I've come up with to deal with them. 1. any hit that can deal you damage has a 1/20 chance of disabling you. (natural 1) This is really a d20 problem, but using wounding rules would take it from manageable to insane. I have been thinking of switching to exploding d20s and that would help, but it still leaves a very high chance of being disabled with a single hit, even if the character is relatively high level. I was thinking of making everyone "tougher" by making the save against disable be at -15 from the base save instead of -10. (I just realised that action points would really help with this) 2. It is extremely difficult to deal any damage at all to very high-save creatures. once the save bonus reaches the 20 area, it takes very high damage to have a good chance of getting those first few hits in, which leads to another problem. 3. No matter how hard the hit, you never take more than a "wound", which is a piddly -1 on future saves. I was thinking of altering the results of failed saves as follows: if you miss by less than five you take a "light wound" for -1 to subsequent saves, if you miss by five to nine you take a "wound" for -2 to subsequent saves, if you miss by ten to fourteen you take a "serious wound" for -3 to subsequent saves, and if you miss by fifteen or more you are disabled. 4. Reducing variation of creature toughness. UA mentions it (basing the wound system on the fort save leaves only two alternatives to represent toughness, "Good" and "bad" saves), but I don't really see the problem. My solution is to make a seperate "wound save" and make 6 save progressions to replace the 6 hit die sizes. Con still provides the bonus to this save. [code] d4 = "bad" = 1/3 level = 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 d6 = "medium" = 2/5 level = 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 d8 = "medium +1" = 1 + 2/5 level = 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 d10 = "good" = 2 + 1/2 level = 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 d12 = "good + 1" = 3 + 1/2 level = 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 [/code] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fixing the problems I have with UAs wound system
Top