Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 7596129" data-attributes="member: 6801228">I was being a little snippy to be honest. The phrase "real utility" made me think that you wanted to imply this was the true use of the feat that we hadn't considered. That it was a great feat if only we had thought about it in the right way. Apologies for assuming, but I've been embroiled in some heated discussions recently and it's made me a little more short than I should be with people. Mounted Combatant does give things the player cannot otherwise have though, which is why in a campaign where combats happen outside more than inside, allowing for combatants to be mounted, it can be a great feat. Weapon Master gives you something you normally have (proficiency) and it is either proficiency with weapons other classes use well, or proficiency in weapons that the DM decided you did not get proficiency with for plot reasons. They come from different mindsets for me.</blockquote>