Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Weiley31" data-source="post: 8438226" data-attributes="member: 7017196">It's their whole "Keep It Simple Stupid" philosophy that is an aspect of 5E. Also it leads to having it being a headache trying to work out the details(pros/cons/table issues) of playing Large/Tiny races. Even though Raiders of the Serpent Sea/Iron Kingdom: Requiem have already figured out ways of working out certain details for Large size pcs in their own ways.Although I do view that WoTC insistence on balance, by reverse tuning stuff/strange decisions, sometimes doesn't make sense when they have before, in the past, had no probs with giving players stronger options like Yuan-Ti Purebloods, Satyrs, the Twilight Cleric, and perfectly being okay with giving Fey typed racial options as pc choices.Editor's Note: I'm not saying that Balance shouldn't be important or they should chuck it out the window, I just mean it more that their walk backs at times is weird despite what's been done before. Only with the recent UAs have they actually decided to test the waters pass their "fears" a bit. and even came up with an interesting method of PB usage/Ki Points for the UA version of the Dragon Ascendant monk subclass</blockquote>