Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 8346301" data-attributes="member: 1465">I am not impressed. I had enough with lame subclasses, the last good ones for me was the Xanathar's, then they started feeling like the prestige class bloat of 3e.I don't like lesser draconic monsters very much, I can understand they're useful to bring the 2nd D of D&D into lower levels, but they still dilute the awe of dragonkind. Even less I like playable draconic races, for the same reason. Never liked gem dragons, too cartoonish and focused on psionics (a whole area I was never fond of).A new age category is nice for storytelling and worldbuilding. It'll never see a practical use in my games with those CRs however.New spells and feats are always welcome in my games. But ONE feat certainly isn't going to make me want to spend a full book price.What I would like to see to change my mind, is extensive awesome fluff (similar to Volo's) about dragons, that is great to read and can be incorporated into your campaign in bits and pieces or as a whole. And as for crunch, give me new alternative TRUE dragon types that are more unique. I don't know, pick some sensible words out of a dictionary and design a dragon around each: how about an Autumn Dragon, a Luck Dragon, an Ocean Dragon, a Moon Dragon, a Rain Dragon... what they could be?</blockquote>