Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
FKR: How Fewer Rules Can Make D&D Better
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9024055" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>A lot of the time, I fail my own wisdom saving throw. I sometimes will refer to <strong>FKR</strong> with the assumption that people will know what I'm talking about, given that I've written about it in the past. However, as [USER=6747251]@Micah Sweet[/USER] recently reminded me, that is not the case. So, since it has been a while since I've gone into this, I thought I'd post some collected thoughts on the subject, and end with a conclusion as to how, even if you do not choose to play FKR games, some of the concepts can be used in your own D&D game.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>1. What is FKR?</strong></p><p><em>Despite being the stuff of nightmares, Santa is the world’s most popular home intruder.</em></p><p></p><p>To start with, there isn't a single answer to even the most basic of questions. The "FK" part is easy- <strong>F</strong>ree <strong>K</strong>riegsspiel. As for the R? Well, it is usually used to refer to <strong>R</strong>evolution, although it's also <strong>R</strong>evival as well as <strong>R</strong>oleplaying. But before even getting into the debate over RRR (hat tip, BOLLYWOOD!) let's look <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/d-ds-evolution-rulings-rules-and-system-matters.682585/" target="_blank">back at the history</a> to remember what Free Kriegsspiel is!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So FKR, whatever the R might be, is really an attempt to recapture that original roleplaying spirit- to make do with less, not more. To have players engage with the world without worrying about the rules. To play, as much as possible, in that "Arneson-ian" model. But if you just read that long excerpt, you're probably still confused ... what is FKR?</p><p></p><p>I've previously had multiple threads on the subject, as well as trying to answer questions, but in the end, my advice is always the same- it's better to just do it than to ask a lot of questions, because many people struggle conceptually with it, and it's much easier to learn by doing.</p><p></p><p>It was ages ago, but I still remember the first time I encountered a diceless roleplaying game. And it took me nearly a year to be able to run it! I just ... couldn't grasp it. As simple as the concepts seem to me now, I just didn't know what to do. Honestly, if it wasn't for the fact that I really really really wanted to play Amber, I might have given up. But why ... why was it so hard for me to understand? A big part of it was that I spent a year trying to understand instead of just doing it- reading and re-reading and trying to make sense of it in terms of having spend more than a decade playing dice-based games with heavy rulesets.</p><p></p><p>And I think that the issue FKR proponents have (from their perspective) is similar- how do you explain to someone who is used to rolling abilities, that they don't need to? How do you explain to someone who is used to checking their skills, that they don't need worry about those skills? How do you explain to someone who has spent years engaging in rules mastery ... that rules don't matter? Fundamentally, the questions that get asked end up being completely orthogonal to the issue, and are usually best resolved by doing.</p><p></p><p>And that's why we see this as a relatively formless and amorphous thing. What is FKR? What are the real and salient features? The real reason I think it's hard to pin down is because it's not based in a working theory, so much as aspiration. Play the world, not the rules. Get the rules out of the way.</p><p></p><p><em><u>What is FKR? First, it's the description of a movement, of people advocating for a type of play. Second, it's about the reduction of rules. It's about reducing the rules to the absolute minimum, and then reducing them even more.</u></em></p><p></p><p>Rules-lite. This is an FKR game-</p><p>[ATTACH=full]285269[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>That's not the cover. That's the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>2. Understanding Why FKR Matters</strong></p><p><em>Why are you the one crying when it’s the onion that is getting hurt?</em></p><p></p><p>Does FKR matter? I mean, in a certain way ... nothing matters. But having already gone through that awkward phase involving way too much black eyeliner, let me assure you- nihilism is exhausting. It takes a extraordinary amount of energy to not care. Anyway, FKR is a necessary piece of a large puzzle. You can see this by looking at the way that "FKR" approaches different games.</p><p></p><p>For example, a lot of the early proponents of FKR were drawn from the OSR community, and were people that were attracted to the idea of getting "back" to the concept of play that existed before the rules cruft of 1e- to, in effect, try and capture the early Arnesonian model of play. An example of this would <a href="https://darkwormcolt.files.wordpress.com/2022/07/the-landshut-rules-vx.pdf" target="_blank">the Landshut Rules</a>. Others have noted that <a href="https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/318283/Any-Planet-Is-Earth" target="_blank">Any Planet is Earth</a> draws inspiration from how Marc Miller actually ran Traveller. You can see it tackle off-beat ideas, such as <a href="https://d3b4g.itch.io/dark-empires" target="_blank">magic in the time of Napoleon</a> with Dark Empires. Then again, maybe you're a Blades in the Dark fan ... <a href="https://ozmodeuz.itch.io/messerspiel" target="_blank">FKR has you covered too with Mersserspiel</a>!</p><p></p><p>Or, perhaps, you've seen me post something stupid.</p><p>[SPOILER=SOMETHING STUPID]</p><p><strong><em>YOU ARE A DISCO PARTY ANIMAL. YOU ARE A PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE. </em></strong>You are navigating a complicated world of fans, drugs, and disco. The dancing lights, the blinding lights …</p><p></p><p>You don’t want trouble. You and your fellow sports-friends just want a good time after a hard day of playing your sport for fame and money. And yet … trouble always seems to find you. Aliens, animal/hybrid athletes, undead worshippers of yacht rock, robot narcs with bad blow, living nightmares summoned by cursed relics, that guy 'Chad' who only nods his head to the music, and worse … they all stand between you and your bliss- partying on the dance floor and busting out your insanely superior dancing styles. You might not have a “badge” or “official authority,” but you’re a famous person with impeccable dance moves. People know who you are. THEY KNOW WHO YOU ARE. They are looking to you to keep the party going.</p><p></p><p>You have three abilities:</p><p><strong>FAME</strong> How recognizable you are to the commoners you sometimes have to associate with. This is not your brain, just the flame, it puts you in charge to keep you sane.</p><p><strong>MONEY </strong>How many of your millions are left after your agent, your family, your agent’s family, your drug dealer, your dealer’s family and your entourage have taken their cut. The best things in life are free, but you can give them to the birds and bees- you have to pay to play.</p><p><strong>DANCE</strong> You can dance, you can jive, having the time of your life. Let the music take control, let the rhythm move you- everybody dance now! Just ... not as good as you.</p><p><em>You have-a 1, and-a 2, and-a 3. Assign one number to each ability.</em></p><p></p><p><strong><em>WHY ARE YOU FAMOUS? (d6)</em></strong></p><p>1. On the field legend. It’s just about the rings.</p><p>2. In commercials for brands. What brands? All of them.</p><p>3. Social media superstar. More people watch you on TikTok than watch the World Cup.</p><p>4. Tabloid wreck. You’re shambolic, and people love to root for you falling (to get back up again).</p><p>5. You’re famous for partying with all the famous people. Every rose its thorn, and every ‘gram has its you.</p><p>6. Your golden-honeyed voice powers a singing career that has eclipsed both your on-field exploits and your off-field dancing.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>WHAT IS YOUR UNIQUE DANCE MOVE? (2D10, COMBINE)</em></strong></p><p>1. Moon</p><p>2. Booty</p><p>3. Natural</p><p>4. Void</p><p>5. Shadow</p><p>6. Running</p><p>7. Cha-cha</p><p>8. Drunken</p><p>9. Crazy-legged</p><p>10. Robotic</p><p>+</p><p>1. Chicken</p><p>2. Hammer</p><p>3. Slideriffic</p><p>4. Rabbit</p><p>5. Faceplant</p><p>6. Sidelick</p><p>7. Elephant Trunk</p><p>8. Elevation</p><p>9. Vertigo</p><p>10. Shakeyshakeys</p><p></p><p><strong><em>WHAT TYPE OF ATHLETE ARE YOU? (d6)</em></strong></p><p>1. Path of the Racket</p><p>2. Way of the Track</p><p>3. Keeper of the Eighteen Holes</p><p>4. Baller of the Baskets</p><p>5. Oath of the Footballer</p><p>6. Art of the Rink</p><p></p><p><strong>HOW DO?</strong></p><p>Narrate your actions. If you’re in doubt of the result because it’s something that will solve a major problem or provide you an advantage over an NPC, roll d6x(ability number), so an ability score of 2 lets you roll 2d6. Roll for most applicable ability; if you’re trying to score or bribe someone, roll MONEY, but if you need to intimidate the Erudite GOAT with your amazing dance moves, roll DANCE. In addition, you can trade party favors for additional dice.</p><p></p><p><u>DC</u></p><p>4= standard</p><p>5=risky stuff</p><p>6=woah now!</p><p></p><p>If the highest dice roll>DC, you have succeeded and you get to describe what happens. If it’s the same, you succeed, you get a pooper, and the GM describes something bad that happens as well. If it’s lower, you fail, get a pooper, get a favor, and the GM describes something bad.</p><p></p><p>When you fail, if your pooper>highest dice, YOU ARE THE PARTY POOPER. You need to take a break to boot & rally, and reset your poopers and favors to zero.</p><p></p><p><strong><em><u>GAMEMASTER SECTION</u></em></strong></p><p>Set up the first domino for the players and let them start knocking things over. If a situation can’t be resolved by dancing, partying, or the player asking the NPC, “Do you know who I am?” ask yourself, “Could I make this situation solvable by dancing, partying, or unthinking privilege exercised by someone famous and/or rich?”</p><p></p><p><strong>WHAT KIND OF DANCE PLACE DOES THIS RESEMBLE? (d6)</strong></p><p>1. Studio 54, but more gaudy and less restrained.</p><p>2. The Hacienda nightclub, but more psychedelic.</p><p>3. The Limelight, but less feel-good.</p><p>4. Le Clique, but more acrobats and less clothes.</p><p>5. Mudd Club, themed for Mother’s Day.</p><p>6. It’s a warehouse. Somewhere. Don’t tell anyone.</p><p></p><p><strong>WHAT’S HAPPENING AT THE DISCOTHEQUE? (Roll 2d6 twice, nest the problems within each other)</strong></p><p>2. A cursed dreamcatcher inside the disco ball is manifesting the nightmares of the guest into reality!</p><p>3. It’s a non-stop party, and no one can leave or stop dancing while the dancing lights play over the dance floor!</p><p>4. The kinky dungeon (INVITE ONLY) is being run by ravenous vampires!</p><p>5. The paintings in the unfinished rooms of the building begin to animate!</p><p>6. Killer robots? Killer robots!</p><p>7. Zombie rock lovers want to turn the beat around and bring the club to the soothing sounds of Michael McDonald. So smooth!</p><p>8. Aliens are taking over the bodies of the dancers and replacing them one ... at ... a time.</p><p>9. A truckload of tourists infected with a terrible plague breaks in and start line-dancing.</p><p>10. A mad scientist is going to use the disco ball as a power source for his laser to melt the polar ice caps, but first ... he must clear the dance floor.</p><p>11. The spirits and wraiths of those who have partied before begin to appear throughout the club.</p><p>12. The Fire Department has been alerted to code violations, except the Fire Department is a cult that worships a dark demon lord.</p><p></p><p><strong>WHO IS TRYING TO STOP THE PARTY? (Roll 2d6 twice)</strong></p><p>2. The Erudite GOAT. The mutated hybrid clone of Tom Brady and Albert Einstein is going to bore you to death explaining the scientific basis for great athletic performance.</p><p>3. The Destitute Dragon. The head of the Klan hates how disco music is bringing marginalized people together, and is going to destroy the dance and take your money.</p><p>4. The Thin White Dude. This cadaverous figure is going station to station and want to kill you and take your drugs.</p><p>5. Le Freak. A monstrous abomination that wishes it was chic.</p><p>6. The Woodknocker. A scary monster, but not a super creep.</p><p>7. Boogie Oogie Oogie. A ghoul with scent of carrion, the look of death, but the taste … of golden honey.</p><p>8. Sheena the Punk Rocker. She's going to carry all the kids away from the Discotheque.</p><p>9. The Chief of Police. The very very sexy Chief of Police.</p><p>10. The Unappreciated Bouncer, resentful of the party people.</p><p>11. The hot avatar of a hot god who'd rather spend quality time with you.</p><p>12. The uncaring abyss that is the over-forward march of time, and to which we all must, in the end, admit defeat.</p><p>[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p>But the important thing to notice is this- other than the paucity of written rules, there can be a lot of variation in exactly what constitutes an FKR game. So instead of focusing on the specifics of the games (which can vary) I think it's more important to look at the philosophy and the approach and to examine why it matters, and what it can bring to our games.</p><p></p><p>I often think that disparate approaches can be useful analytical lenses with which to view games. One constant tension we see in RPGs is the distinction between first-order design and second-order design. While the game designer can exert direct control over the rules of the game, the actual gameplay depends on the processes that emerge at the table. This gameplay, this "second-order design" can be glimpsed through extensive playtesting, and can be addressed through the rules (the first order), but will always be, to some extent, beyond the ability of the game designer to dictate.</p><p></p><p>Thinking about this issue, you can see that there might be two disparate ways to approach a problem. Imagine that you have a table playing a game (say, D&D 3e). You're enjoying it, but you keep finding that the game itself, the rules, they aren't conducive to the type of game you want! From there, you could then think of two possible solutions-</p><p>1. Focus on the rules, and change them to match the style of play you're looking for. If the rules are the problem, and the rules .... matter ... then the solution is new rules.</p><p>2. If the rules are the problem, get rid of the rules. The difference between a board game and a TTRPG is you are not constrained by the rules since you have a human that can adjudicate.</p><p></p><p>Same problem, different solutions. One is design-centric, one is table-centric. One focuses on the first-order design issue, and one focuses on the second-order design by, for all practical purposes, punting on first-order design. That's not to say that FKR proponents have no thoughts on issues like preferences for opposed dice rolls, or dice pools, or even the high-falutin' topics like the "division of authority" between the players and the DM- but that these issues are subsumed under the more general gestalt of looking to make the rules minimal and subservient to the fiction.</p><p></p><p>The goal of FKR proponents is to shrink the size of the rules to the point where you can drown the stragglers in a bathtub.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>3. Some General Questions About FKR, Answered</strong></p><p><em>Why do we need police? Because one in twenty people have been the victim of crime, which means that nineteen out of twenty people are criminals.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>A. That's a lot of words, Snarf. I still don't get it. What is FKR?</em></p><p><em>sigh</em> When in doubt, substitute "rules-lite." That said, I will quote Jim Parkin-</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>B. Is FKR for everyone?</em></p><p>HA HA! No. People like what they like. For example, if you are the type of person who gets into fiddly bits and loves chargen and min/max, FKR probably isn't going to be your bag. If you love massed combats on tables with minis, FKR doesn't offer a lot. If you've got a great group playing PbTA variants and enjoying deep character complexity, I don't think that FKR games will give you anything in particular that you are seeking. Finally, because FKR is so resolutely anti-commercial, it's just not going to have a lot of products. FKR is, and will likely remain, a rounding error even when it comes to the indie games for TTRPGs.</p><p></p><p><em>C. Is FKR just OSR with different letters?</em></p><p>Absolutely not. While some FKR proponents certainly came from the OSR crowd, OSR is concerned with recreating the rules of early D&D versions as well as the styles of play (see, e.g., OSE, OSIRIC, etc.). FKR is focused on removing rules, and the games encompass an infinite variety of genres ... from the profound to the profoundly stupid.</p><p></p><p><em>D. Some of the links you have below talk about "high trust." Is this just the "big con" for DMs to do whatever they want?</em></p><p>Nope. "High trust" means that everyone at the table trusts each other- the players trust the referee to make fair rulings, the referee and players trust each other to engage in the fiction in good faith, and so on. If you looked at the various games I've linked to (or even looked at Perfected ....) you will notice that FKR games don't have a unified view of authority. A great example of this is <a href="http://catchyourhare.com/files/Cthulhu%20Dark.pdf" target="_blank">Cthulhu Dark</a>. This is how the issue of authority is addressed:</p><p><em>Who decides when to roll Insanity? Who decides when it’s interesting to know how well you do something? Who decides when something disturbs your PC? Who decides whether you might fail? Decide the answers with your group. Make reasonable assumptions. For example, some groups will let the Keeper decide everything. Others will share the decisions. These rules are designed to play prewritten scenarios, run by a Keeper. If you try improvising scenarios or playing without a Keeper, let me know.</em></p><p></p><p>That said, there are a fair number of games that will default to the Arnesonian model (which is more referee-centric). This is an example from Dark Empires-</p><p><em>Action, Risk and consequences...</em></p><p><em>The game master clearly describes the situation and environment to the players. The players use common sense and what they already know about the world to decide upon and then clearly describe their characters actions.</em></p><p><em>The gm will then decide if their suggested action is feasible and then apply the consequences.</em></p><p><em>If the outcome of the situation is unclear, is very risky or has a poor chance of success the player and gm both roll 2d6. If the player rolls higher than the gm they succeed! If the gm rolls higher, the player fails in some way or the action succeeds but at some cost.</em></p><p><em>The difference in the results indicates the degree of success or failure.</em></p><p></p><p>The one theme going through is that there is trust at the table; this is what I often refer to as the assumption that everyone is playing in good faith, but has also been stated, more colorfully by Mike Mornard, as <em>The Rules can't fix stupid, and they can't fix a*<em>h**</em>.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>E. So What is FKR Good At?</em></p><p>Fun. FKR is FUN! I don't want oversell it, but if I want to do a one-shot, or do an limited-time adventure, this is exactly perfect. And the best thing is ... there are no limits in terms of genres or subjects. Any thing that tickles my fancy ... I can do. I don't have to wait for BigRPG to publish a sourcebook. I don't have to worry about balance. I don't have to get all concerned about whether my synergistic character options for my 5th level MC character are actually a TRAP at 10th level.</p><p></p><p>And these experiences carry over, too. FKR makes me a better and more agile DM in other games, and it make my players better and more interesting players in other games as well. If you've been playing rules-heavy games for a while (and compared to FKR, they are all rules-heavy), it can do wonders to actually play games where there is no real focus on the rules, the mechanics ... the game ... and the focus is entirely on the fiction. It can refresh and reinvigorate your approach to other games.</p><p></p><p><em>F. Uh huh. So, again, if FKR is so magical, is it bad at anything?</em></p><p>In my opinion? Yes. First, it is harder to run long campaigns. This is a personal opinion- if you go around on-line, you'll find FKR people that will swear up and down that they've run FKR campaigns for years. And, of course, the original Arnesonian model was a campaign as well. But my honest opinion is that <em>without scaffolding it becomes harder.</em> And that scaffolding for advancement ... well, that's usually going to be rules. It's not <em>impossible</em> to run FKR campaigns for a long time, and people certainly do it, but it will take additional effort (IMO).</p><p></p><p>The other issue is slightly more abstract, and is what led to my series of posts (which I will finish any month now) on dice- FKR, much like PbTA games, can lack a certain "gaminess" feeling. It's not that it isn't fun, and rewarding, but it does less to tickle that part of the brain that is there for the joy of playing a game. Or, put another way, say what you will about the slog that is D&D combat, but there is something about seeing a 20 pop up when you're fighting for your life.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>4. Conclusion- What Can I Use From FKR in my D&D Game?</strong></p><p><em>Some of Churchill’s words were immortal. If he was alive today, imagine how good his tweets would’ve been.</em></p><p></p><p>I think that there are a few things that I have learned. The first is that FKR is an amazing palate cleanser. The versatility and lightness of the rules means that it's not intimidating for players, and I can run an FKR game on those nights when everyone doesn't show up, or just as a break. It reinvigorates and recharges.</p><p></p><p>Next, it gets the referee and players thinking more about the fiction in D&D. I believe this to be important- far too often, players are looking at their character sheets for solutions, and DMs are thinking about the rules in order to say no. When people are engaged with the fiction in D&D, it provides for a better experience. D&D will always have a ton of rules, but remembering that the rules are supposed to be the servant of the fiction, not the master ... that makes the game better for my table.</p><p></p><p>Finally, and this may not be for everyone, my main gaming table simply incorporates certain FKR concepts into D&D. Even though 5e is simplified (compared to other editions), the basic concepts of FKR allow for even further simplification. Imagine the following-</p><p></p><p>Your player says she does something.</p><p>You disagree.</p><p>You both roll dice.</p><p>If your player rolls high, her view of reality prevails.</p><p>If you roll high, your view prevails.</p><p>If you roll within 3 of each other, you negotiate.</p><p></p><p>I mean ... why not, right?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[SPOILER=RESOURCES]</p><p>I do not agree with everything that is stated by these other sites, but they all provide additional and interesting information if you wish to look further.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/rpg/comments/lvcjqz/a_brief_introduction_to_the_emerging_fkr_free/?utm_source=embedv2&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_content=whitespace" target="_blank">Reddit Thread - Brief Introduction to FKR</a> (this has additional links in it as well)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://d66kobolds.blogspot.com/2020/09/free-kriegsspiel-worlds-not-rules-etc.html" target="_blank">Free Kriegsspeil: Worlds, Not Rules</a> (d66 Kobolds)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://d66kobolds.blogspot.com/2021/04/how-i-run-and-play-ultralight-game.html" target="_blank">How I Run an Ultralight Game</a> (d66 Kobolds)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://undergroundadv.blogspot.com/2023/01/free-kriegsspiel-roleplaying.html" target="_blank">Free Kriegsspiel Roleplaying</a> (Underground Adventures)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.revenant-quill.com/2020/10/in-praise-of-rulings-not-rules.html" target="_blank">In Praise of Rulings, Not Rules</a> (Revenant's Quill)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://dreamingdragonslayer.wordpress.com/2021/08/23/rules-laws-and-worlds/" target="_blank">Rules, Laws, and Worlds</a> (Dreaming Dragon Slayer)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://yak-hack.blogspot.com/2019/11/table-centric-design.html" target="_blank">Table-Centric Design</a> (Yak-Hack)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://rolltop-indigo.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-invisible-rulebooks.html" target="_blank">Invisible Rulebooks</a> (Rolltop Indigo)</p><p></p><p>Finally, this is an interesting mini-essay where someone considered, and eventually rejected, the idea that they should move toward FKR-</p><p><a href="https://roleplayrescue.com/2022/01/03/is-my-trajectory-fkr/" target="_blank">Is My Trajectory FKR?</a> (Roleplay Rescue)</p><p></p><p>That's just scraping the surface- there are innumerable blog posts, youtube videos, and other resources if you want to look further into these issues, as well as discord communities and so on.</p><p>[/SPOILER]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9024055, member: 7023840"] A lot of the time, I fail my own wisdom saving throw. I sometimes will refer to [B]FKR[/B] with the assumption that people will know what I'm talking about, given that I've written about it in the past. However, as [USER=6747251]@Micah Sweet[/USER] recently reminded me, that is not the case. So, since it has been a while since I've gone into this, I thought I'd post some collected thoughts on the subject, and end with a conclusion as to how, even if you do not choose to play FKR games, some of the concepts can be used in your own D&D game. [B]1. What is FKR?[/B] [I]Despite being the stuff of nightmares, Santa is the world’s most popular home intruder.[/I] To start with, there isn't a single answer to even the most basic of questions. The "FK" part is easy- [B]F[/B]ree [B]K[/B]riegsspiel. As for the R? Well, it is usually used to refer to [B]R[/B]evolution, although it's also [B]R[/B]evival as well as [B]R[/B]oleplaying. But before even getting into the debate over RRR (hat tip, BOLLYWOOD!) let's look [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/d-ds-evolution-rulings-rules-and-system-matters.682585/']back at the history[/URL] to remember what Free Kriegsspiel is! So FKR, whatever the R might be, is really an attempt to recapture that original roleplaying spirit- to make do with less, not more. To have players engage with the world without worrying about the rules. To play, as much as possible, in that "Arneson-ian" model. But if you just read that long excerpt, you're probably still confused ... what is FKR? I've previously had multiple threads on the subject, as well as trying to answer questions, but in the end, my advice is always the same- it's better to just do it than to ask a lot of questions, because many people struggle conceptually with it, and it's much easier to learn by doing. It was ages ago, but I still remember the first time I encountered a diceless roleplaying game. And it took me nearly a year to be able to run it! I just ... couldn't grasp it. As simple as the concepts seem to me now, I just didn't know what to do. Honestly, if it wasn't for the fact that I really really really wanted to play Amber, I might have given up. But why ... why was it so hard for me to understand? A big part of it was that I spent a year trying to understand instead of just doing it- reading and re-reading and trying to make sense of it in terms of having spend more than a decade playing dice-based games with heavy rulesets. And I think that the issue FKR proponents have (from their perspective) is similar- how do you explain to someone who is used to rolling abilities, that they don't need to? How do you explain to someone who is used to checking their skills, that they don't need worry about those skills? How do you explain to someone who has spent years engaging in rules mastery ... that rules don't matter? Fundamentally, the questions that get asked end up being completely orthogonal to the issue, and are usually best resolved by doing. And that's why we see this as a relatively formless and amorphous thing. What is FKR? What are the real and salient features? The real reason I think it's hard to pin down is because it's not based in a working theory, so much as aspiration. Play the world, not the rules. Get the rules out of the way. [I][U]What is FKR? First, it's the description of a movement, of people advocating for a type of play. Second, it's about the reduction of rules. It's about reducing the rules to the absolute minimum, and then reducing them even more.[/U][/I] Rules-lite. This is an FKR game- [ATTACH type="full" alt="1684339184110.png"]285269[/ATTACH] That's not the cover. That's the game. [B]2. Understanding Why FKR Matters[/B] [I]Why are you the one crying when it’s the onion that is getting hurt?[/I] Does FKR matter? I mean, in a certain way ... nothing matters. But having already gone through that awkward phase involving way too much black eyeliner, let me assure you- nihilism is exhausting. It takes a extraordinary amount of energy to not care. Anyway, FKR is a necessary piece of a large puzzle. You can see this by looking at the way that "FKR" approaches different games. For example, a lot of the early proponents of FKR were drawn from the OSR community, and were people that were attracted to the idea of getting "back" to the concept of play that existed before the rules cruft of 1e- to, in effect, try and capture the early Arnesonian model of play. An example of this would [URL='https://darkwormcolt.files.wordpress.com/2022/07/the-landshut-rules-vx.pdf']the Landshut Rules[/URL]. Others have noted that [URL='https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/318283/Any-Planet-Is-Earth']Any Planet is Earth[/URL] draws inspiration from how Marc Miller actually ran Traveller. You can see it tackle off-beat ideas, such as [URL='https://d3b4g.itch.io/dark-empires']magic in the time of Napoleon[/URL] with Dark Empires. Then again, maybe you're a Blades in the Dark fan ... [URL='https://ozmodeuz.itch.io/messerspiel']FKR has you covered too with Mersserspiel[/URL]! Or, perhaps, you've seen me post something stupid. [SPOILER=SOMETHING STUPID] [B][I]YOU ARE A DISCO PARTY ANIMAL. YOU ARE A PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE. [/I][/B]You are navigating a complicated world of fans, drugs, and disco. The dancing lights, the blinding lights … You don’t want trouble. You and your fellow sports-friends just want a good time after a hard day of playing your sport for fame and money. And yet … trouble always seems to find you. Aliens, animal/hybrid athletes, undead worshippers of yacht rock, robot narcs with bad blow, living nightmares summoned by cursed relics, that guy 'Chad' who only nods his head to the music, and worse … they all stand between you and your bliss- partying on the dance floor and busting out your insanely superior dancing styles. You might not have a “badge” or “official authority,” but you’re a famous person with impeccable dance moves. People know who you are. THEY KNOW WHO YOU ARE. They are looking to you to keep the party going. You have three abilities: [B]FAME[/B] How recognizable you are to the commoners you sometimes have to associate with. This is not your brain, just the flame, it puts you in charge to keep you sane. [B]MONEY [/B]How many of your millions are left after your agent, your family, your agent’s family, your drug dealer, your dealer’s family and your entourage have taken their cut. The best things in life are free, but you can give them to the birds and bees- you have to pay to play. [B]DANCE[/B] You can dance, you can jive, having the time of your life. Let the music take control, let the rhythm move you- everybody dance now! Just ... not as good as you. [I]You have-a 1, and-a 2, and-a 3. Assign one number to each ability.[/I] [B][I]WHY ARE YOU FAMOUS? (d6)[/I][/B] 1. On the field legend. It’s just about the rings. 2. In commercials for brands. What brands? All of them. 3. Social media superstar. More people watch you on TikTok than watch the World Cup. 4. Tabloid wreck. You’re shambolic, and people love to root for you falling (to get back up again). 5. You’re famous for partying with all the famous people. Every rose its thorn, and every ‘gram has its you. 6. Your golden-honeyed voice powers a singing career that has eclipsed both your on-field exploits and your off-field dancing. [B][I]WHAT IS YOUR UNIQUE DANCE MOVE? (2D10, COMBINE)[/I][/B] 1. Moon 2. Booty 3. Natural 4. Void 5. Shadow 6. Running 7. Cha-cha 8. Drunken 9. Crazy-legged 10. Robotic + 1. Chicken 2. Hammer 3. Slideriffic 4. Rabbit 5. Faceplant 6. Sidelick 7. Elephant Trunk 8. Elevation 9. Vertigo 10. Shakeyshakeys [B][I]WHAT TYPE OF ATHLETE ARE YOU? (d6)[/I][/B] 1. Path of the Racket 2. Way of the Track 3. Keeper of the Eighteen Holes 4. Baller of the Baskets 5. Oath of the Footballer 6. Art of the Rink [B]HOW DO?[/B] Narrate your actions. If you’re in doubt of the result because it’s something that will solve a major problem or provide you an advantage over an NPC, roll d6x(ability number), so an ability score of 2 lets you roll 2d6. Roll for most applicable ability; if you’re trying to score or bribe someone, roll MONEY, but if you need to intimidate the Erudite GOAT with your amazing dance moves, roll DANCE. In addition, you can trade party favors for additional dice. [U]DC[/U] 4= standard 5=risky stuff 6=woah now! If the highest dice roll>DC, you have succeeded and you get to describe what happens. If it’s the same, you succeed, you get a pooper, and the GM describes something bad that happens as well. If it’s lower, you fail, get a pooper, get a favor, and the GM describes something bad. When you fail, if your pooper>highest dice, YOU ARE THE PARTY POOPER. You need to take a break to boot & rally, and reset your poopers and favors to zero. [B][I][U]GAMEMASTER SECTION[/U][/I][/B] Set up the first domino for the players and let them start knocking things over. If a situation can’t be resolved by dancing, partying, or the player asking the NPC, “Do you know who I am?” ask yourself, “Could I make this situation solvable by dancing, partying, or unthinking privilege exercised by someone famous and/or rich?” [B]WHAT KIND OF DANCE PLACE DOES THIS RESEMBLE? (d6)[/B] 1. Studio 54, but more gaudy and less restrained. 2. The Hacienda nightclub, but more psychedelic. 3. The Limelight, but less feel-good. 4. Le Clique, but more acrobats and less clothes. 5. Mudd Club, themed for Mother’s Day. 6. It’s a warehouse. Somewhere. Don’t tell anyone. [B]WHAT’S HAPPENING AT THE DISCOTHEQUE? (Roll 2d6 twice, nest the problems within each other)[/B] 2. A cursed dreamcatcher inside the disco ball is manifesting the nightmares of the guest into reality! 3. It’s a non-stop party, and no one can leave or stop dancing while the dancing lights play over the dance floor! 4. The kinky dungeon (INVITE ONLY) is being run by ravenous vampires! 5. The paintings in the unfinished rooms of the building begin to animate! 6. Killer robots? Killer robots! 7. Zombie rock lovers want to turn the beat around and bring the club to the soothing sounds of Michael McDonald. So smooth! 8. Aliens are taking over the bodies of the dancers and replacing them one ... at ... a time. 9. A truckload of tourists infected with a terrible plague breaks in and start line-dancing. 10. A mad scientist is going to use the disco ball as a power source for his laser to melt the polar ice caps, but first ... he must clear the dance floor. 11. The spirits and wraiths of those who have partied before begin to appear throughout the club. 12. The Fire Department has been alerted to code violations, except the Fire Department is a cult that worships a dark demon lord. [B]WHO IS TRYING TO STOP THE PARTY? (Roll 2d6 twice)[/B] 2. The Erudite GOAT. The mutated hybrid clone of Tom Brady and Albert Einstein is going to bore you to death explaining the scientific basis for great athletic performance. 3. The Destitute Dragon. The head of the Klan hates how disco music is bringing marginalized people together, and is going to destroy the dance and take your money. 4. The Thin White Dude. This cadaverous figure is going station to station and want to kill you and take your drugs. 5. Le Freak. A monstrous abomination that wishes it was chic. 6. The Woodknocker. A scary monster, but not a super creep. 7. Boogie Oogie Oogie. A ghoul with scent of carrion, the look of death, but the taste … of golden honey. 8. Sheena the Punk Rocker. She's going to carry all the kids away from the Discotheque. 9. The Chief of Police. The very very sexy Chief of Police. 10. The Unappreciated Bouncer, resentful of the party people. 11. The hot avatar of a hot god who'd rather spend quality time with you. 12. The uncaring abyss that is the over-forward march of time, and to which we all must, in the end, admit defeat. [/SPOILER] But the important thing to notice is this- other than the paucity of written rules, there can be a lot of variation in exactly what constitutes an FKR game. So instead of focusing on the specifics of the games (which can vary) I think it's more important to look at the philosophy and the approach and to examine why it matters, and what it can bring to our games. I often think that disparate approaches can be useful analytical lenses with which to view games. One constant tension we see in RPGs is the distinction between first-order design and second-order design. While the game designer can exert direct control over the rules of the game, the actual gameplay depends on the processes that emerge at the table. This gameplay, this "second-order design" can be glimpsed through extensive playtesting, and can be addressed through the rules (the first order), but will always be, to some extent, beyond the ability of the game designer to dictate. Thinking about this issue, you can see that there might be two disparate ways to approach a problem. Imagine that you have a table playing a game (say, D&D 3e). You're enjoying it, but you keep finding that the game itself, the rules, they aren't conducive to the type of game you want! From there, you could then think of two possible solutions- 1. Focus on the rules, and change them to match the style of play you're looking for. If the rules are the problem, and the rules .... matter ... then the solution is new rules. 2. If the rules are the problem, get rid of the rules. The difference between a board game and a TTRPG is you are not constrained by the rules since you have a human that can adjudicate. Same problem, different solutions. One is design-centric, one is table-centric. One focuses on the first-order design issue, and one focuses on the second-order design by, for all practical purposes, punting on first-order design. That's not to say that FKR proponents have no thoughts on issues like preferences for opposed dice rolls, or dice pools, or even the high-falutin' topics like the "division of authority" between the players and the DM- but that these issues are subsumed under the more general gestalt of looking to make the rules minimal and subservient to the fiction. The goal of FKR proponents is to shrink the size of the rules to the point where you can drown the stragglers in a bathtub. [B]3. Some General Questions About FKR, Answered[/B] [I]Why do we need police? Because one in twenty people have been the victim of crime, which means that nineteen out of twenty people are criminals. A. That's a lot of words, Snarf. I still don't get it. What is FKR? sigh[/I] When in doubt, substitute "rules-lite." That said, I will quote Jim Parkin- [I]B. Is FKR for everyone?[/I] HA HA! No. People like what they like. For example, if you are the type of person who gets into fiddly bits and loves chargen and min/max, FKR probably isn't going to be your bag. If you love massed combats on tables with minis, FKR doesn't offer a lot. If you've got a great group playing PbTA variants and enjoying deep character complexity, I don't think that FKR games will give you anything in particular that you are seeking. Finally, because FKR is so resolutely anti-commercial, it's just not going to have a lot of products. FKR is, and will likely remain, a rounding error even when it comes to the indie games for TTRPGs. [I]C. Is FKR just OSR with different letters?[/I] Absolutely not. While some FKR proponents certainly came from the OSR crowd, OSR is concerned with recreating the rules of early D&D versions as well as the styles of play (see, e.g., OSE, OSIRIC, etc.). FKR is focused on removing rules, and the games encompass an infinite variety of genres ... from the profound to the profoundly stupid. [I]D. Some of the links you have below talk about "high trust." Is this just the "big con" for DMs to do whatever they want?[/I] Nope. "High trust" means that everyone at the table trusts each other- the players trust the referee to make fair rulings, the referee and players trust each other to engage in the fiction in good faith, and so on. If you looked at the various games I've linked to (or even looked at Perfected ....) you will notice that FKR games don't have a unified view of authority. A great example of this is [URL='http://catchyourhare.com/files/Cthulhu%20Dark.pdf']Cthulhu Dark[/URL]. This is how the issue of authority is addressed: [I]Who decides when to roll Insanity? Who decides when it’s interesting to know how well you do something? Who decides when something disturbs your PC? Who decides whether you might fail? Decide the answers with your group. Make reasonable assumptions. For example, some groups will let the Keeper decide everything. Others will share the decisions. These rules are designed to play prewritten scenarios, run by a Keeper. If you try improvising scenarios or playing without a Keeper, let me know.[/I] That said, there are a fair number of games that will default to the Arnesonian model (which is more referee-centric). This is an example from Dark Empires- [I]Action, Risk and consequences... The game master clearly describes the situation and environment to the players. The players use common sense and what they already know about the world to decide upon and then clearly describe their characters actions. The gm will then decide if their suggested action is feasible and then apply the consequences. If the outcome of the situation is unclear, is very risky or has a poor chance of success the player and gm both roll 2d6. If the player rolls higher than the gm they succeed! If the gm rolls higher, the player fails in some way or the action succeeds but at some cost. The difference in the results indicates the degree of success or failure.[/I] The one theme going through is that there is trust at the table; this is what I often refer to as the assumption that everyone is playing in good faith, but has also been stated, more colorfully by Mike Mornard, as [I]The Rules can't fix stupid, and they can't fix a*[I]h**[/I]. E. So What is FKR Good At?[/I] Fun. FKR is FUN! I don't want oversell it, but if I want to do a one-shot, or do an limited-time adventure, this is exactly perfect. And the best thing is ... there are no limits in terms of genres or subjects. Any thing that tickles my fancy ... I can do. I don't have to wait for BigRPG to publish a sourcebook. I don't have to worry about balance. I don't have to get all concerned about whether my synergistic character options for my 5th level MC character are actually a TRAP at 10th level. And these experiences carry over, too. FKR makes me a better and more agile DM in other games, and it make my players better and more interesting players in other games as well. If you've been playing rules-heavy games for a while (and compared to FKR, they are all rules-heavy), it can do wonders to actually play games where there is no real focus on the rules, the mechanics ... the game ... and the focus is entirely on the fiction. It can refresh and reinvigorate your approach to other games. [I]F. Uh huh. So, again, if FKR is so magical, is it bad at anything?[/I] In my opinion? Yes. First, it is harder to run long campaigns. This is a personal opinion- if you go around on-line, you'll find FKR people that will swear up and down that they've run FKR campaigns for years. And, of course, the original Arnesonian model was a campaign as well. But my honest opinion is that [I]without scaffolding it becomes harder.[/I] And that scaffolding for advancement ... well, that's usually going to be rules. It's not [I]impossible[/I] to run FKR campaigns for a long time, and people certainly do it, but it will take additional effort (IMO). The other issue is slightly more abstract, and is what led to my series of posts (which I will finish any month now) on dice- FKR, much like PbTA games, can lack a certain "gaminess" feeling. It's not that it isn't fun, and rewarding, but it does less to tickle that part of the brain that is there for the joy of playing a game. Or, put another way, say what you will about the slog that is D&D combat, but there is something about seeing a 20 pop up when you're fighting for your life. [B]4. Conclusion- What Can I Use From FKR in my D&D Game?[/B] [I]Some of Churchill’s words were immortal. If he was alive today, imagine how good his tweets would’ve been.[/I] I think that there are a few things that I have learned. The first is that FKR is an amazing palate cleanser. The versatility and lightness of the rules means that it's not intimidating for players, and I can run an FKR game on those nights when everyone doesn't show up, or just as a break. It reinvigorates and recharges. Next, it gets the referee and players thinking more about the fiction in D&D. I believe this to be important- far too often, players are looking at their character sheets for solutions, and DMs are thinking about the rules in order to say no. When people are engaged with the fiction in D&D, it provides for a better experience. D&D will always have a ton of rules, but remembering that the rules are supposed to be the servant of the fiction, not the master ... that makes the game better for my table. Finally, and this may not be for everyone, my main gaming table simply incorporates certain FKR concepts into D&D. Even though 5e is simplified (compared to other editions), the basic concepts of FKR allow for even further simplification. Imagine the following- Your player says she does something. You disagree. You both roll dice. If your player rolls high, her view of reality prevails. If you roll high, your view prevails. If you roll within 3 of each other, you negotiate. I mean ... why not, right? [SPOILER=RESOURCES] I do not agree with everything that is stated by these other sites, but they all provide additional and interesting information if you wish to look further. [URL='https://www.reddit.com/r/rpg/comments/lvcjqz/a_brief_introduction_to_the_emerging_fkr_free/?utm_source=embedv2&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_content=whitespace']Reddit Thread - Brief Introduction to FKR[/URL] (this has additional links in it as well) [URL='https://d66kobolds.blogspot.com/2020/09/free-kriegsspiel-worlds-not-rules-etc.html']Free Kriegsspeil: Worlds, Not Rules[/URL] (d66 Kobolds) [URL='https://d66kobolds.blogspot.com/2021/04/how-i-run-and-play-ultralight-game.html']How I Run an Ultralight Game[/URL] (d66 Kobolds) [URL='https://undergroundadv.blogspot.com/2023/01/free-kriegsspiel-roleplaying.html']Free Kriegsspiel Roleplaying[/URL] (Underground Adventures) [URL='https://www.revenant-quill.com/2020/10/in-praise-of-rulings-not-rules.html']In Praise of Rulings, Not Rules[/URL] (Revenant's Quill) [URL='https://dreamingdragonslayer.wordpress.com/2021/08/23/rules-laws-and-worlds/']Rules, Laws, and Worlds[/URL] (Dreaming Dragon Slayer) [URL='https://yak-hack.blogspot.com/2019/11/table-centric-design.html']Table-Centric Design[/URL] (Yak-Hack) [URL='https://rolltop-indigo.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-invisible-rulebooks.html']Invisible Rulebooks[/URL] (Rolltop Indigo) Finally, this is an interesting mini-essay where someone considered, and eventually rejected, the idea that they should move toward FKR- [URL='https://roleplayrescue.com/2022/01/03/is-my-trajectory-fkr/']Is My Trajectory FKR?[/URL] (Roleplay Rescue) That's just scraping the surface- there are innumerable blog posts, youtube videos, and other resources if you want to look further into these issues, as well as discord communities and so on. [/SPOILER] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
FKR: How Fewer Rules Can Make D&D Better
Top