Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flaming Weapon Stealth Errata?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WalterKovacs" data-source="post: 5545082" data-attributes="member: 63763"><p>At no point did I say that scorching burst <em>should</em> be weaker.</p><p> </p><p>I said that, they don't errata stuff <em>just</em> because it's weaker.</p><p> </p><p>If something is too powerful, it will disrupt games. If something sucks, it just won't see play. And scorching burst doesn't suck ... it's just not as good as freezing burst. So, UNLESS you want to do fire damage, no one is forcing someone to pick the lesser of two options (And there are a ton of other options available). If you DO want to do fire damage, your choices are limited. The same if you want to do ice damage.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I wasn't talking about reducing the damage of scorching burst. I was saying that if the made ANOTHER area burst fire attack they would probably have to reduce the damage if they gave it an effect, because if they DIDN'T we'd get "why is scorching burst so bad, why would anyone ever take it when this power is purely better doing the same damage and giving a bonus effect?".</p><p> </p><p>The better solution would be, if making a new area burst fire power with a rider ... just make that new power the "new" scorching burst, in the same way they updated magic missle.</p><p> </p><p>My point there was responding to someone that said "they will never make another fire burst power because there already was one". That's why I pointed out that cold has two now, and then I went into speculation as to how they might work around the existing power ... they may make the new power an upgrade to the existing one, they may make one that is simply better than the old one, or they may try to make it so that some people may stil want to use scorching burst.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>In which case you don't take that class feature, you focus more on your other school, and take an at-will power for that school instead of scorching burst, problem solved. There is even a single target fire power at-will to be able to benefit from the level 1 class feature for pyromancers in addition to any encounter/daily powers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WalterKovacs, post: 5545082, member: 63763"] At no point did I say that scorching burst [i]should[/i] be weaker. I said that, they don't errata stuff [i]just[/i] because it's weaker. If something is too powerful, it will disrupt games. If something sucks, it just won't see play. And scorching burst doesn't suck ... it's just not as good as freezing burst. So, UNLESS you want to do fire damage, no one is forcing someone to pick the lesser of two options (And there are a ton of other options available). If you DO want to do fire damage, your choices are limited. The same if you want to do ice damage. I wasn't talking about reducing the damage of scorching burst. I was saying that if the made ANOTHER area burst fire attack they would probably have to reduce the damage if they gave it an effect, because if they DIDN'T we'd get "why is scorching burst so bad, why would anyone ever take it when this power is purely better doing the same damage and giving a bonus effect?". The better solution would be, if making a new area burst fire power with a rider ... just make that new power the "new" scorching burst, in the same way they updated magic missle. My point there was responding to someone that said "they will never make another fire burst power because there already was one". That's why I pointed out that cold has two now, and then I went into speculation as to how they might work around the existing power ... they may make the new power an upgrade to the existing one, they may make one that is simply better than the old one, or they may try to make it so that some people may stil want to use scorching burst. In which case you don't take that class feature, you focus more on your other school, and take an at-will power for that school instead of scorching burst, problem solved. There is even a single target fire power at-will to be able to benefit from the level 1 class feature for pyromancers in addition to any encounter/daily powers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flaming Weapon Stealth Errata?
Top