Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ketjak" data-source="post: 2403666" data-attributes="member: 1083">I can't recall the last time someone touched a mummy with a live, open flame of any kind and reported the results. I wish I had a LexisNexis (<a href="http://www.lexis.com/" target="_blank">http://www.lexis.com/</a>) account.However, I also agree with Hyp. By the RAW, he's spot on.And FWIW:At that point, the question is answered WRT the whip. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Since the FB weapon deals the damage, and the weapon is a whip, no damage is dealt to armored or natural armor +3 targets. No one has yet shown using the RAW how there's an exception to the whip rule - though lots of people wish hard that the magic enhancement on those special abilities contradicts the whip damage rule.- Ket</blockquote>