Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flaming whip
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Storyteller01" data-source="post: 2412810" data-attributes="member: 20931"><p>Nope. The RAW has been quoted stating that a <em><u>whip</u></em> does no damage to an armored opponent. A flaming whip, while a type of whip, has another set of rules that do not apply to the standard whip. If the two weapons were the same, we wouldn't be wasting bandwidth. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>For reference:</p><p></p><p>The RAW has been quoted saying that there is a difference between a 0 attribute and a -- attribute. No such statement has been made that it also pertains to weapons. This has been assumed as fact without proof.</p><p></p><p>The text of the whip states that it does no damage to an armored target. This has not been defined as 0 or -- damage by the RAW.</p><p></p><p>The enhancement states that it adds +1d6 damage to the weapon. It does not state that this damage is subject to the special rules of that weapon, only that a strike must be made. One can surmise that there is a distinction between weapon damage (damage dealt by the weapon as a whole) and whip damage (damage inflicted only by the whip itself, due to its peculiar nature).</p><p></p><p>The flaming enchantment states that the additional 1d6 fire damage is applied on a successful strike, not damage. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So it depends on your interpretation:</p><p></p><p>If a whip does 0 damage to an armored target on a successful strike, then the fire damage adds 1d6 given that, while it is 'weapon damage' (ie damage inflicted by the weapon), it isn't whip damage (that whole fire thingy).</p><p></p><p>If a whip does -- damage (as yet to be proven) then it doesn't matter what else you add to the mix.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If a critter is immune to slashing damage, and attacked with a flaming sword, is it immune to all damage (including fire)?</p><p></p><p>If I'm wrong, then please show the quote. I'm officially out, but that doesn't mean I won't watch. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Storyteller01, post: 2412810, member: 20931"] Nope. The RAW has been quoted stating that a [I][U]whip[/U][/I] does no damage to an armored opponent. A flaming whip, while a type of whip, has another set of rules that do not apply to the standard whip. If the two weapons were the same, we wouldn't be wasting bandwidth. :) For reference: The RAW has been quoted saying that there is a difference between a 0 attribute and a -- attribute. No such statement has been made that it also pertains to weapons. This has been assumed as fact without proof. The text of the whip states that it does no damage to an armored target. This has not been defined as 0 or -- damage by the RAW. The enhancement states that it adds +1d6 damage to the weapon. It does not state that this damage is subject to the special rules of that weapon, only that a strike must be made. One can surmise that there is a distinction between weapon damage (damage dealt by the weapon as a whole) and whip damage (damage inflicted only by the whip itself, due to its peculiar nature). The flaming enchantment states that the additional 1d6 fire damage is applied on a successful strike, not damage. So it depends on your interpretation: If a whip does 0 damage to an armored target on a successful strike, then the fire damage adds 1d6 given that, while it is 'weapon damage' (ie damage inflicted by the weapon), it isn't whip damage (that whole fire thingy). If a whip does -- damage (as yet to be proven) then it doesn't matter what else you add to the mix. If a critter is immune to slashing damage, and attacked with a flaming sword, is it immune to all damage (including fire)? If I'm wrong, then please show the quote. I'm officially out, but that doesn't mean I won't watch. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flaming whip
Top