Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flaming whip
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 2413500" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>#1) No it isn't an exception. Where does it say that it is an exception?</p><p></p><p>There is the GENERAL rule that weapons do a certain #D whatever upon a successful strike.</p><p>There is a more specific rule that the whip deals no damage on a successful hit against a foe with a +3 nat armor bonus or a +1 armor bonus.</p><p>But there is an EVEN MORE specific rule that the whip with the Flaming enhancement does 1d6 fire damage.</p><p></p><p>Why is it more specific than the rule about whips? Because there is the "Set of All Whips," which contains (obviously) all whips. Then, within that set is the "Set of Magical Whips," within which is the "Set of Magical Whips with Special Abilities," and within that, the "Set of Magical Whips with the Flaming Special Ability"- and some other subsets besides...</p><p></p><p>#2) Hyps' formulation of the problem essentially violates the principle that a weapon that deals 2 kinds of damage can damage a target that is not immune to both. Here, the second type is magical fire.</p><p></p><p>#3) It seems to me, and to others, that the reading of the Flaming power is being tortured. Some feel that the damage is being done by the weapon, not the enchantment. "A flaming weapon deals..." has been much discussed, but read on.</p><p></p><p>Once more:</p><p></p><p></p><p>The second sentence of this entry reads "<em><strong>THE FIRE</strong></em> does not harm the wielder"- not "<strong><em>THE FLAMING WEAPON</em></strong>." This matters. They have already made a distinction between the weapon and the power granted by the magic. "A flaming weapon" is nothing more than a description of a weapon wrapped in a shroud of magical fire. And if the wielder tried to kill himself with this weapon's flames, he would fail. </p><p></p><p>#4)Furthermore, ignoring the fire damage because of the armor/natural armor problem with whips would also violate p28DMG- "Certain types of damage, however, should never be nonlethal damage...such as fire"</p><p></p><p>However- one thing I think we can ALL agree on is: <strong>Don't use your Vorpal Whip against Trolls unless its a Flaming Vorpal Whip.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 2413500, member: 19675"] #1) No it isn't an exception. Where does it say that it is an exception? There is the GENERAL rule that weapons do a certain #D whatever upon a successful strike. There is a more specific rule that the whip deals no damage on a successful hit against a foe with a +3 nat armor bonus or a +1 armor bonus. But there is an EVEN MORE specific rule that the whip with the Flaming enhancement does 1d6 fire damage. Why is it more specific than the rule about whips? Because there is the "Set of All Whips," which contains (obviously) all whips. Then, within that set is the "Set of Magical Whips," within which is the "Set of Magical Whips with Special Abilities," and within that, the "Set of Magical Whips with the Flaming Special Ability"- and some other subsets besides... #2) Hyps' formulation of the problem essentially violates the principle that a weapon that deals 2 kinds of damage can damage a target that is not immune to both. Here, the second type is magical fire. #3) It seems to me, and to others, that the reading of the Flaming power is being tortured. Some feel that the damage is being done by the weapon, not the enchantment. "A flaming weapon deals..." has been much discussed, but read on. Once more: The second sentence of this entry reads "[I][B]THE FIRE[/B][/I] does not harm the wielder"- not "[B][I]THE FLAMING WEAPON[/I][/B]." This matters. They have already made a distinction between the weapon and the power granted by the magic. "A flaming weapon" is nothing more than a description of a weapon wrapped in a shroud of magical fire. And if the wielder tried to kill himself with this weapon's flames, he would fail. #4)Furthermore, ignoring the fire damage because of the armor/natural armor problem with whips would also violate p28DMG- "Certain types of damage, however, should never be nonlethal damage...such as fire" However- one thing I think we can ALL agree on is: [B]Don't use your Vorpal Whip against Trolls unless its a Flaming Vorpal Whip.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flaming whip
Top