Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flanking with a ranged weapon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rvdvelden" data-source="post: 3686647" data-attributes="member: 48167"><p>I know where the difficulty lies here, as I have dealt with this question in a previous situation myself. </p><p></p><p>We had two rogues (well one rogue and a fighter/rogue) that wanted to get sneak attack damage from ranged attacks (a feature exclusively for rogues <u>when they're within 30 ft. of the opponent</u>).</p><p></p><p>The problem is that someone needs to threaten the opponent in order to get a flanking bonus. So you still need someone on the other side with a melee weapon that is in striking distance of the opponenent.</p><p></p><p>In the case of two rogues on opposite sides of an opponent and they're <u>both</u> using ranged attacks, there is no flanking between them and therefore no sneak attack as well. As soon as one of them comes in striking distance with a melee weapon, the <u>other</u> rogue gets a flanking bonus and sneak attack damage. The one holding the melee weapon doesn't, as there is no opposing ally threatening the opponent on the opposite side. If both wield melee weapons and are in striking distance and on opposite sides of the opponent, both would get the flanking bonus and therefore the sneak attack damage.</p><p></p><p>I remember a 3.0 PrC (Peerless Archer or something like that?) that made a person wielding a bow threaten all areas within 30 ft. (at 10th level from the PrC, so it would've taken a high level character to pull that off). I've askes Wizards on at least three seperate occasions why they never converted that PrC to 3.5. They never gave any answer, but I guess they realized that this was probably just too powerful to let it return.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rvdvelden, post: 3686647, member: 48167"] I know where the difficulty lies here, as I have dealt with this question in a previous situation myself. We had two rogues (well one rogue and a fighter/rogue) that wanted to get sneak attack damage from ranged attacks (a feature exclusively for rogues [U]when they're within 30 ft. of the opponent[/U]). The problem is that someone needs to threaten the opponent in order to get a flanking bonus. So you still need someone on the other side with a melee weapon that is in striking distance of the opponenent. In the case of two rogues on opposite sides of an opponent and they're [U]both[/U] using ranged attacks, there is no flanking between them and therefore no sneak attack as well. As soon as one of them comes in striking distance with a melee weapon, the [U]other[/U] rogue gets a flanking bonus and sneak attack damage. The one holding the melee weapon doesn't, as there is no opposing ally threatening the opponent on the opposite side. If both wield melee weapons and are in striking distance and on opposite sides of the opponent, both would get the flanking bonus and therefore the sneak attack damage. I remember a 3.0 PrC (Peerless Archer or something like that?) that made a person wielding a bow threaten all areas within 30 ft. (at 10th level from the PrC, so it would've taken a high level character to pull that off). I've askes Wizards on at least three seperate occasions why they never converted that PrC to 3.5. They never gave any answer, but I guess they realized that this was probably just too powerful to let it return. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flanking with a ranged weapon?
Top