Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flanking with yourself
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 2950877" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>Well first, that's how ALL flanking works though. By definition, there are two people only one of which is attacking a square at that moment. In fact, I'd venture to guess that an awful lot of flanking happens between two people one of which has no intention of ever attacking the square in question.</p><p></p><p>Second, if there is an NPC to your left and right, and another PC next to each of those NPCs in a straight line, you being in the center are still threatening both the NPCs to either side of you for purposes of flanking even when actually attacking just one of them. That tends to happen about once a game for us actuall (it would like like this PNPNP with P = PC and N = NPC).</p><p></p><p>Third, you could actually hit both targets. All you need is multiple attacks. You are eligible to attack both targets with the same full action (or even a standard action with certain feats and abilities). There are no rules that you need to re-adjust the chain or anything between switching from 5' attacks to 10' attacks.</p><p></p><p>"Threaten" is just that you COULD attack the square, not that you are currently doing so. And with the chain, you COULD attack either square. And with the feat, you count as if you are in both places at once for purposed of flanking.</p><p></p><p>I really think by RAW this works. I wouldn't do it as I said, but I think some might like this tactic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 2950877, member: 2525"] Well first, that's how ALL flanking works though. By definition, there are two people only one of which is attacking a square at that moment. In fact, I'd venture to guess that an awful lot of flanking happens between two people one of which has no intention of ever attacking the square in question. Second, if there is an NPC to your left and right, and another PC next to each of those NPCs in a straight line, you being in the center are still threatening both the NPCs to either side of you for purposes of flanking even when actually attacking just one of them. That tends to happen about once a game for us actuall (it would like like this PNPNP with P = PC and N = NPC). Third, you could actually hit both targets. All you need is multiple attacks. You are eligible to attack both targets with the same full action (or even a standard action with certain feats and abilities). There are no rules that you need to re-adjust the chain or anything between switching from 5' attacks to 10' attacks. "Threaten" is just that you COULD attack the square, not that you are currently doing so. And with the chain, you COULD attack either square. And with the feat, you count as if you are in both places at once for purposed of flanking. I really think by RAW this works. I wouldn't do it as I said, but I think some might like this tactic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flanking with yourself
Top