Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Flanking
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheOneGargoyle" data-source="post: 8162624" data-attributes="member: 6924207"><p>Wow, go to sleep and look what you miss when a thread is active ! Lots of interesting discussion !</p><p></p><p></p><p>I also don't see it detracting from the thread, or off-topic at all. Quite the contrary I see it as an extremely elegant solution to the problem of what the OP is asking / trying to achieve.</p><p></p><p>Points from the OP:</p><p> * flanking as written in the DMG is too easy to obtain</p><p> * the advantage that it grants is too strong a benefit for something so easy to obtain</p><p> * advantage specifically obviates the benefits from certain class features</p><p> * however not using flanking reduces the driver for more tactical playstyle</p><p></p><p>Question from the OP:</p><p> * how many use flanking and do you use it as written or homebrew it ?</p><p></p><p>So in a nutshell, it seems the OP is looking for a solution that drives & incentivises a more tactical playstyle, but without being too easy to obtain a benefit that is too strong or that undermines class features, with consideration for as-written or homebrew rulings.</p><p></p><p>To me, using Facing & Marking gets a lot of ticks against these criteria:</p><p> * It is rules as written in the DMG (just as optional as Flanking, no more, no less) so no homebrew required. Tick.</p><p> * It means thinking about positioning & facing and involves judicious use of their mark, reaction and OA, so it drives a tactical playstyle. Tick.</p><p> * It isn't as easy as simply "I turn up to the melee so I have advantage in all my attacks". Tick.</p><p> * And, it only grants advantage to specifically OA's and attacks on the rear arc, so there is still room for class abilities that specifically grant advantage to still have an added benefit over this. Partial Tick (in some situations the class abilities might still be superceded). </p><p> * OAs become more useful than by default, some extra crunchiness is available if desired (such as shields only benefitting against attacks in front & left arcs, being surrounded or having someone behind you actually matters, etc). Not part of the original criteria but worthy of bonus points IMHO.</p><p></p><p>Overall rating vs OP critieria: 4/4 (if the partial tick and the bonus pts add up to a whole point between them)</p><p></p><p>That doesn't mean of course that it's the best/only valid solution to the OP, there may be others that are as good or better. But in terms of what the OP was asking for, it certainly looks pretty on-point to me !</p><p></p><p></p><p>Both entirely fair points. </p><p>The stacking +1 instead of advantage is also another valid option. On the plus die it would definitely not undermine any class abilities as it's different from any existing mechanics. On the downside, it's different from any existing mechanics so it's entirely homebrew. It's probably in the same boat as the flanking rule of "I just turn up and get a big benefit" too.</p><p>Overall I'd give this one maybe a 2/4 vs the OP criteria.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheOneGargoyle, post: 8162624, member: 6924207"] Wow, go to sleep and look what you miss when a thread is active ! Lots of interesting discussion ! I also don't see it detracting from the thread, or off-topic at all. Quite the contrary I see it as an extremely elegant solution to the problem of what the OP is asking / trying to achieve. Points from the OP: * flanking as written in the DMG is too easy to obtain * the advantage that it grants is too strong a benefit for something so easy to obtain * advantage specifically obviates the benefits from certain class features * however not using flanking reduces the driver for more tactical playstyle Question from the OP: * how many use flanking and do you use it as written or homebrew it ? So in a nutshell, it seems the OP is looking for a solution that drives & incentivises a more tactical playstyle, but without being too easy to obtain a benefit that is too strong or that undermines class features, with consideration for as-written or homebrew rulings. To me, using Facing & Marking gets a lot of ticks against these criteria: * It is rules as written in the DMG (just as optional as Flanking, no more, no less) so no homebrew required. Tick. * It means thinking about positioning & facing and involves judicious use of their mark, reaction and OA, so it drives a tactical playstyle. Tick. * It isn't as easy as simply "I turn up to the melee so I have advantage in all my attacks". Tick. * And, it only grants advantage to specifically OA's and attacks on the rear arc, so there is still room for class abilities that specifically grant advantage to still have an added benefit over this. Partial Tick (in some situations the class abilities might still be superceded). * OAs become more useful than by default, some extra crunchiness is available if desired (such as shields only benefitting against attacks in front & left arcs, being surrounded or having someone behind you actually matters, etc). Not part of the original criteria but worthy of bonus points IMHO. Overall rating vs OP critieria: 4/4 (if the partial tick and the bonus pts add up to a whole point between them) That doesn't mean of course that it's the best/only valid solution to the OP, there may be others that are as good or better. But in terms of what the OP was asking for, it certainly looks pretty on-point to me ! Both entirely fair points. The stacking +1 instead of advantage is also another valid option. On the plus die it would definitely not undermine any class abilities as it's different from any existing mechanics. On the downside, it's different from any existing mechanics so it's entirely homebrew. It's probably in the same boat as the flanking rule of "I just turn up and get a big benefit" too. Overall I'd give this one maybe a 2/4 vs the OP criteria. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Flanking
Top