Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flat-Footed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5626124" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>That's internally nonsense. In the first part of the sentence you say, "a character who has prepared himself with a potential thread he has perceived", which means that character has taken an action. When did he take that action? In the prior round! So, how you can you claim that some later round is the 'first round', if actions have already been taken in prior round? You are trying to say that the character exists in a state where he is both aware of the threat and has had time to act in response to it, and also he exists in a state where has not had time to act in response to it. That's a contridiction.</p><p></p><p>The rules are very explicit. If you have had time to act, you are not flatfooted.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>You just showed yourself. The rules say that when a character has acted, then he is not flat-footed. And clearly the character in the example has acted after percieving a potential threat, and therefore clearly has had time to act, and therefore clearly his place in the initiative order has already come up so that he could act. If his turn in the initiative order has not already come up, then how could he have acted?</p><p></p><p>What you are trying to say is that a character's actions don't count as actions unless you as the DM deem that some mystical point has passed which only you are in control of and you allow the player to roll for initiative.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I'm not. I'm being a such a stickler for the rules here that it seems like house ruling to you, much as someone who was a real stickler for the 1e rules - things like simultaneous secret declarations of intent, to AC vs. weapon modifiers, weapon reach vs. initiative, and so forth - might have seemed as if they had wierd house rules to someone who played in a more casual manner. My guess is that at your table you call initiative at various points for various cinematic and personal reasons and reasons of convienence, and doing that would be a house rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5626124, member: 4937"] That's internally nonsense. In the first part of the sentence you say, "a character who has prepared himself with a potential thread he has perceived", which means that character has taken an action. When did he take that action? In the prior round! So, how you can you claim that some later round is the 'first round', if actions have already been taken in prior round? You are trying to say that the character exists in a state where he is both aware of the threat and has had time to act in response to it, and also he exists in a state where has not had time to act in response to it. That's a contridiction. The rules are very explicit. If you have had time to act, you are not flatfooted. You just showed yourself. The rules say that when a character has acted, then he is not flat-footed. And clearly the character in the example has acted after percieving a potential threat, and therefore clearly has had time to act, and therefore clearly his place in the initiative order has already come up so that he could act. If his turn in the initiative order has not already come up, then how could he have acted? What you are trying to say is that a character's actions don't count as actions unless you as the DM deem that some mystical point has passed which only you are in control of and you allow the player to roll for initiative. No, I'm not. I'm being a such a stickler for the rules here that it seems like house ruling to you, much as someone who was a real stickler for the 1e rules - things like simultaneous secret declarations of intent, to AC vs. weapon modifiers, weapon reach vs. initiative, and so forth - might have seemed as if they had wierd house rules to someone who played in a more casual manner. My guess is that at your table you call initiative at various points for various cinematic and personal reasons and reasons of convienence, and doing that would be a house rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flat-Footed
Top