Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 4468789" data-attributes="member: 18280">They have attempted to.&nbsp; As repeatedly rebutted by myself and others, their points force you to accept other, equally problematical and absurd things, to solve the arrow of time problem.&nbsp; Schrödinger's Argument to resolve Schrödinger's Wounding.&nbsp; All they managed to do was demonstrate that the problem doesn't bother them, which was never in dispute.Personally, I find the &quot;the problem you experience doesn't exist&quot; line of reasoning to be disingenious at best, and at worst indicates a set of blinders that renders the &quot;reasoning&quot; worthless.&nbsp; This is exactly what occurred with what are now widely acknowledged problems with 3e.&nbsp; I eagerly await 5e (with luck) or 6e (without it) so that we can reopen this discussion with the advantage of hindsight.&nbsp; Until then, I hope you don't mind if I ignore any further &quot;but there is no problem!&quot; posts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 4468789, member: 18280"] They have attempted to. As repeatedly rebutted by myself and others, their points force you to accept other, equally problematical and absurd things, to solve the arrow of time problem. Schrödinger's Argument to resolve Schrödinger's Wounding. All they managed to do was demonstrate that the problem doesn't bother them, which was never in dispute. Personally, I find the "the problem you experience doesn't exist" line of reasoning to be disingenious at best, and at worst indicates a set of blinders that renders the "reasoning" worthless. This is exactly what occurred with what are now widely acknowledged problems with 3e. I eagerly await 5e (with luck) or 6e (without it) so that we can reopen this discussion with the advantage of hindsight. Until then, I hope you don't mind if I ignore any further "but there is no problem!" posts. [/QUOTE]

Verification