Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Flawless Concentration Feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8279669" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>That's not a logical argument for concentration breaking on damage.</p><p></p><p>That is a logical argument for only being able to concentrate on one spell at once. Literally everything you're saying supports the "only one spell at once" approach, but not breaking on damage. There's no choice with breaking on damage, there's no "meaningful decision", there's nothing interesting or engaging about it at all - even you "have the martials protect the caster" is just white room nonsense that isn't how D&D works - sooner or later casters take damage, and spells break, and the martials are doing their best to protect people anyway.</p><p></p><p>All that concentration breaking really does is curtail the power of a few spells that could have had their power curtailed in a different way. Whereas only concentrating on one thing is genuinely a meaningful decision.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure it does but Krachek isn't entirely off the mark when he says the only concentration spells some people cast are the very best ones. There are two reasons for that, of course - it's got to be something so valuable that you're willing to only get a partial duration out of it if you get interrupted, and it's got to be something so valuable that you won't want to cast any other concentration spells whilst it's up.</p><p></p><p>People who aren't considering those factors probably aren't making a "meaningful decision" to cast a concentration spell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8279669, member: 18"] That's not a logical argument for concentration breaking on damage. That is a logical argument for only being able to concentrate on one spell at once. Literally everything you're saying supports the "only one spell at once" approach, but not breaking on damage. There's no choice with breaking on damage, there's no "meaningful decision", there's nothing interesting or engaging about it at all - even you "have the martials protect the caster" is just white room nonsense that isn't how D&D works - sooner or later casters take damage, and spells break, and the martials are doing their best to protect people anyway. All that concentration breaking really does is curtail the power of a few spells that could have had their power curtailed in a different way. Whereas only concentrating on one thing is genuinely a meaningful decision. I'm sure it does but Krachek isn't entirely off the mark when he says the only concentration spells some people cast are the very best ones. There are two reasons for that, of course - it's got to be something so valuable that you're willing to only get a partial duration out of it if you get interrupted, and it's got to be something so valuable that you won't want to cast any other concentration spells whilst it's up. People who aren't considering those factors probably aren't making a "meaningful decision" to cast a concentration spell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Flawless Concentration Feat
Top