Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flexible Magic System Idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InkwellIdeas" data-source="post: 4097466" data-attributes="member: 26988"><p>I've been working up what I'm tentatively calling the flexible magic system. Like many people, I'd like something different than the core D&D magic system. I've gone quite a bit further than what's here, but I don't want this to be too long. I don't want to go too much further until I get some opinions. <em>I have two main questions for the group, but any comments or constructive criticism is welcome. The first is do you know of similar products/projects?</em> I have Elements of Magic, and that's not quite what I'm going for here. Unearthed Arcana and metamagic feats doesn't come anywhere close. I've thought about getting Arcana Evolved but I'm not sure that has anything close based on what little I've been able to read (the table of contents.) <em>My other question is: does this seem interesting to you? Worth reading/trying?</em> Thanks! Here's the gist of my idea:</p><p></p><p>Goals:</p><p>-Allow spellcasters to modify spell factors. (Area, range, duration, damage, etc.)</p><p>-Preserve game balance. Don't make spellcasters more important to the party than any other class. However, if they become a bit more powerful at low levels than they are, that's OK as long as they are the same or slightly less powerful at medium-high through high levels.</p><p>-Make the system as simple as possible, while understanding that it is impossible for it not to be slightly more complicated as a result of the increased spell customization.</p><p></p><p>Approach:</p><p>-A spell point system is helpful because the cost of spells may be more granular than 0-9 spell levels or even 1-20. A relatively minor change to a spell should cost more, but in many cases it isn't important enough to bump it to a higher level. Also, spell's levels will basically be removed. Instead each spell will have a base cost. (A way to map the point values back to levels is possible for people who really want that.)</p><p>-Use familiar spells. To keep things simple, base the core spells that are customized on spells most players are already familiar with.</p><p>-Spells' base costs will be reverse engineered. Several versions with several different factors will be chosen and balanced. Each spell's base cost will be assigned based on what is needed to make all the spells of the same level cost about the same amount.</p><p>-Give the base spell forms point costs, then assign point cost to each value for each factor that it makes sense to change. Multiply the factors to get a point cost. (Ex: Alarm's base cost might be 1, medium range for it might be 2, medium area might also be 2, and an 8 hour duration might be 4, so 1x2x2x4=16 points.)</p><p>-Only whole numbers and one-half fractions will be used to keep the math easy.</p><p>-Unfortunately, because each factor might be more important to some spells than others, the same values can't be used for the factors.</p><p>-But we can try to keep things simple by making the values easy to find and put them on spell cards.</p><p>-Spellcasters may spend many spell points in one spell, effectively trying to cast a higher level spell than they would otherwise be entitled to. Perhaps this would require a concentration check, and at some point (maybe more than two spell levels higher) be impossible. If the caster fails the concentration check he would lose those points or have some other negative impact. While this gives him more power in a way, he would be quickly drained if he made a habit of it.</p><p></p><p>Here's an example:</p><p><strong>Bear's Endurance</strong></p><p>School: Transmutation</p><p>Components: V, S, DF</p><p>Casting Time: 1 standard action</p><p>Saving Throw: Will negates (harmless)</p><p>Spell Resistance: Yes</p><p>Base Factor: 4</p><p>Bonus Factor: 1 + 1 per +2 Bonus</p><p>#Targets Factor: 1 + .5 per 2 additional targets</p><p>Range: Touch: 1; Close (25'): 1.5; Medium (100'): 2; Long (400'): 2.5; Far (1000'): 3</p><p>Duration (D): 1 Round: .5; 1 Minute: 1; 10 Minutes: 1.5; 1 Hour: 2; 8 Hours: 2.5; 1 Day: 3</p><p></p><p>(No major difference in the Bear's Endurance spell description, except those that change based on the variable factors chosen.)</p><p></p><p> Example Calculations</p><p>Base Bonus # Targets Range Duration Total</p><p>[4] +4 [3] 1 Target [1] Touch [1] 1 Minute [1] 12 (2)</p><p>[4] +4 [3] 5 Targets [2] Close [1.5] 1 Minute [1] 36 (4)</p><p>[4] +4 [3] 13 Targets [4] Close [1.5] 10 Minutes [1.5] 108 (6)</p><p>[4] +4 [3] 3 Targets [1.5] Close [1.5] 1 Day [6] 162 (7)</p><p>[4] +10 [6] 1 Target [1] Touch [1] 1 Minute [1] 24 (3)</p><p>[4] +10 [6] 5 Targets [2] Close [1.5] 1 Minute [1] 72 (6)</p><p></p><p>Note: The number in parentheses is the approximate spell level the total point cost maps to based on the spell point system I'm considering.</p><p></p><p>Again, thanks in advance for any constructive criticism.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InkwellIdeas, post: 4097466, member: 26988"] I've been working up what I'm tentatively calling the flexible magic system. Like many people, I'd like something different than the core D&D magic system. I've gone quite a bit further than what's here, but I don't want this to be too long. I don't want to go too much further until I get some opinions. [I]I have two main questions for the group, but any comments or constructive criticism is welcome. The first is do you know of similar products/projects?[/I] I have Elements of Magic, and that's not quite what I'm going for here. Unearthed Arcana and metamagic feats doesn't come anywhere close. I've thought about getting Arcana Evolved but I'm not sure that has anything close based on what little I've been able to read (the table of contents.) [I]My other question is: does this seem interesting to you? Worth reading/trying?[/I] Thanks! Here's the gist of my idea: Goals: -Allow spellcasters to modify spell factors. (Area, range, duration, damage, etc.) -Preserve game balance. Don't make spellcasters more important to the party than any other class. However, if they become a bit more powerful at low levels than they are, that's OK as long as they are the same or slightly less powerful at medium-high through high levels. -Make the system as simple as possible, while understanding that it is impossible for it not to be slightly more complicated as a result of the increased spell customization. Approach: -A spell point system is helpful because the cost of spells may be more granular than 0-9 spell levels or even 1-20. A relatively minor change to a spell should cost more, but in many cases it isn't important enough to bump it to a higher level. Also, spell's levels will basically be removed. Instead each spell will have a base cost. (A way to map the point values back to levels is possible for people who really want that.) -Use familiar spells. To keep things simple, base the core spells that are customized on spells most players are already familiar with. -Spells' base costs will be reverse engineered. Several versions with several different factors will be chosen and balanced. Each spell's base cost will be assigned based on what is needed to make all the spells of the same level cost about the same amount. -Give the base spell forms point costs, then assign point cost to each value for each factor that it makes sense to change. Multiply the factors to get a point cost. (Ex: Alarm's base cost might be 1, medium range for it might be 2, medium area might also be 2, and an 8 hour duration might be 4, so 1x2x2x4=16 points.) -Only whole numbers and one-half fractions will be used to keep the math easy. -Unfortunately, because each factor might be more important to some spells than others, the same values can't be used for the factors. -But we can try to keep things simple by making the values easy to find and put them on spell cards. -Spellcasters may spend many spell points in one spell, effectively trying to cast a higher level spell than they would otherwise be entitled to. Perhaps this would require a concentration check, and at some point (maybe more than two spell levels higher) be impossible. If the caster fails the concentration check he would lose those points or have some other negative impact. While this gives him more power in a way, he would be quickly drained if he made a habit of it. Here's an example: [B]Bear's Endurance[/B] School: Transmutation Components: V, S, DF Casting Time: 1 standard action Saving Throw: Will negates (harmless) Spell Resistance: Yes Base Factor: 4 Bonus Factor: 1 + 1 per +2 Bonus #Targets Factor: 1 + .5 per 2 additional targets Range: Touch: 1; Close (25'): 1.5; Medium (100'): 2; Long (400'): 2.5; Far (1000'): 3 Duration (D): 1 Round: .5; 1 Minute: 1; 10 Minutes: 1.5; 1 Hour: 2; 8 Hours: 2.5; 1 Day: 3 (No major difference in the Bear's Endurance spell description, except those that change based on the variable factors chosen.) Example Calculations Base Bonus # Targets Range Duration Total [4] +4 [3] 1 Target [1] Touch [1] 1 Minute [1] 12 (2) [4] +4 [3] 5 Targets [2] Close [1.5] 1 Minute [1] 36 (4) [4] +4 [3] 13 Targets [4] Close [1.5] 10 Minutes [1.5] 108 (6) [4] +4 [3] 3 Targets [1.5] Close [1.5] 1 Day [6] 162 (7) [4] +10 [6] 1 Target [1] Touch [1] 1 Minute [1] 24 (3) [4] +10 [6] 5 Targets [2] Close [1.5] 1 Minute [1] 72 (6) Note: The number in parentheses is the approximate spell level the total point cost maps to based on the spell point system I'm considering. Again, thanks in advance for any constructive criticism. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Flexible Magic System Idea
Top