Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fluid/changing party makeup
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 1795817" data-attributes="member: 3929"><p>What do you think about this idea for running a campaign...</p><p></p><p>++Assume 4 players in the group.</p><p></p><p>++Each player rolls up 4 characters, all at the same level.</p><p></p><p>++Each player rolls 1d4, and that chooses the character they're playing for this particular adventure.</p><p></p><p>++Play out the adventure with those four characters.</p><p></p><p>++Adventure ends. All characters (even those not played) gain XP for the adventure, so all remain on equal footing. Not the same for material wealth. characters keep what they earn.</p><p></p><p>++DM rolls 1d4, and determines which of the players keeps his character for the next adventure.</p><p></p><p>++The other 3 players roll 1d4 and see which character will be in the next adventure.</p><p></p><p>++Party assembles around the character that stayed on from the first adventure for whatever reason or motive, and they go on the second adventure. </p><p></p><p>++Second adventure ends, DM rolls 1d4 to pick the next character that carrys on. Other players roll 1d4 to see which of their characters gets called from the bullpen.</p><p></p><p>++Rinse, repeat.</p><p></p><p>I got this idea reading my old Conan comic books... Conan seems to run into the same rogues and cutthroats at different points in his life, although they've gained in power, ability, and their backstory has gotten deeper as well.</p><p></p><p>This would allow for there to be more of a plot-driven story (as opposed to character driven) and the PCs would not be restrained to stay together as a party only <em>because</em> they're all PCs: the characters are going to go their seperate ways anyhow. So there doesn't really need to be a burning reason for these guys to stick.</p><p></p><p>It also allows players to explore several different character builds, which can make things a little more interesting as playing the same character with the same abilities can get a little monotonous after a while.</p><p></p><p>Tactics would be interesting -- there wouldn't be a standard operating procedure for fights since there is a new party makeup every adventure.</p><p></p><p>Material wealth would be low... this would have to be run in a low-magic world like Hyboria d20 so a marked lack of magic items at higher levels would be less noticed.</p><p></p><p>There would be a good reason that the BBEG doesn't go after the party at mid-levels when they are not quite a threat, but could become one in the future... it's because there is no "party". Bad guys might know about one of the PCs, but they would not be able to prepare for all 4 of them since any given party hasn't adventured for that long together.</p><p></p><p>There would remain a bit of history twixt the characters, since they will run into each other at different points in their own particular history, although keeping track of the different relationships might be a little difficult... perhaps notes might need to be taken to remind players how their PCs feel about the other individual PCs.</p><p></p><p>So, what do you think about this way of running a campaign?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felix, post: 1795817, member: 3929"] What do you think about this idea for running a campaign... ++Assume 4 players in the group. ++Each player rolls up 4 characters, all at the same level. ++Each player rolls 1d4, and that chooses the character they're playing for this particular adventure. ++Play out the adventure with those four characters. ++Adventure ends. All characters (even those not played) gain XP for the adventure, so all remain on equal footing. Not the same for material wealth. characters keep what they earn. ++DM rolls 1d4, and determines which of the players keeps his character for the next adventure. ++The other 3 players roll 1d4 and see which character will be in the next adventure. ++Party assembles around the character that stayed on from the first adventure for whatever reason or motive, and they go on the second adventure. ++Second adventure ends, DM rolls 1d4 to pick the next character that carrys on. Other players roll 1d4 to see which of their characters gets called from the bullpen. ++Rinse, repeat. I got this idea reading my old Conan comic books... Conan seems to run into the same rogues and cutthroats at different points in his life, although they've gained in power, ability, and their backstory has gotten deeper as well. This would allow for there to be more of a plot-driven story (as opposed to character driven) and the PCs would not be restrained to stay together as a party only [i]because[/i] they're all PCs: the characters are going to go their seperate ways anyhow. So there doesn't really need to be a burning reason for these guys to stick. It also allows players to explore several different character builds, which can make things a little more interesting as playing the same character with the same abilities can get a little monotonous after a while. Tactics would be interesting -- there wouldn't be a standard operating procedure for fights since there is a new party makeup every adventure. Material wealth would be low... this would have to be run in a low-magic world like Hyboria d20 so a marked lack of magic items at higher levels would be less noticed. There would be a good reason that the BBEG doesn't go after the party at mid-levels when they are not quite a threat, but could become one in the future... it's because there is no "party". Bad guys might know about one of the PCs, but they would not be able to prepare for all 4 of them since any given party hasn't adventured for that long together. There would remain a bit of history twixt the characters, since they will run into each other at different points in their own particular history, although keeping track of the different relationships might be a little difficult... perhaps notes might need to be taken to remind players how their PCs feel about the other individual PCs. So, what do you think about this way of running a campaign? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fluid/changing party makeup
Top