Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tessarael" data-source="post: 1064744" data-attributes="member: 12909">Here are the attacks:+15/+15/+15/+10/+5 - Monk 20 Flurry+13/+8/+3, +13/+8/+3 - Monk 20 TWF+13/+13/+13/+8/+3, +13/+8/+3 - Monk 20 Flurry + TWFLet's assume a Flaming Quarterstaff +5 wielding Monk with Strength 22, so damages of:2d6+5+6 = 18 avg in main hand2d6+5+3 = 15 avg in off handI'm going to ignore criticals and assume opponent ACs of 16, 21, 26, and 31.vs AC 16 opponent:96.75 damage from Flurry + TWF76.5 damage from Flurry only64.35 damage from TWF onlyvs AC 21 opponent:63.0 damage from Flurry + TWF54.0 damage from Flurry only39.6 damage from TWF onlyvs AC 26 opponent:34.2 damage from Flurry + TWF32.4 damage from Flurry only19.8 damage from TWF onlyvs AC 31 opponent:13.65 damage from Flurry + TWF15.3 damage from Flurry only8.25 damage from TWF onlyFlurry is clearly better than two-weapon fighting (TWF). Is it unbalanced? Let's compared to the TWF scenario, but now let's make it a 20th level Fighter instead, with attacks of +18/+13/+8/+3 and +18/+13/+8 with TWF:89.7 damage vs AC 1667.05 damage vs AC 2140.5 damage vs AC 2620.7 damage vs AC 31In my opinion, the 20th level Fighter should be better. I don't like the fact that the TWF/Flurry Monk comes out better at AC 16. Other than that, 20th level Monk TWF/Flurry doesn't seem overpowering compared to a 20th level Fighter.</blockquote>