Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Focusing on Combat Maneuvers... is it worth it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 5749188" data-attributes="member: 35909"><p>The problem with combat maneuvers is how ridiculously fast CMD climbs. Look at some monsters at various CRs to see. It is very, very hard to land a maneuver at higher levels, and at lower levels you can usually just kill in -3 hits anyway. Big monsters will have crazy CMD. Even medium sized humanoids will fast grow theirs: not only is it adding two stats instead of one, it's adding all sorts of other random crap, like dodge/insight/deflection AC bonuses...</p><p></p><p>If you build heavily towards optimizing your bonus on a maneuver, you can make it reliably effective much of the time, but it requires a lot of investment.</p><p></p><p>And on the note of how difficult succeeding at maneuvers is...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As the guy who <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/pathfinder-rpg-discussion/308795-dual-shield-ranger-build-help.html" target="_blank">made that Ranger build</a>, I just have to say how awful bull rush IS in PF.</p><p></p><p>Unlike all other maneuvers (except drag now, I guess...a lot of those new maneuvers should've just been folded into existing ones as other applications...), bull rush requires you to do more than win. You want to win by a LOT. You get 5 ft, and then need to win by <strong>five</strong>(!!!) for each extra square you need to push someone. That's just simply not happening most of the time. In 3E, it was possible to drive someone back a fair distance since it was just an opposed str check and you could easily buff your bonus much higher than a foe's str mod, plus he could roll low and you could roll high (in PF, the foe basically gets to "take 10" every time you try). I just don't see that happening much in PF. So unless your DM has a habit of putting non-mook enemies adjacent to cliff faces and the like, that 5 ft just isn't going to cut it for separating a guy from his pals or just clearing him 10+ ft away so he can't full attack on his turn. I suppose you could use bull rush to grant allies already in melee AoOs...but PF nerfed that, too. You used to be able to do that part at least without any feat at all. Now in PF, you need 3 feats and at least 6 levels to do what an untrained commoner could do in 3E (use bull rush to generate AoOs)!</p><p></p><p>I would suggest bull rush for only a very very select few hyper specialized builds that can make the best use out of it. My Ranger build (or a ranger two-handing a single heavy shield works, also) is one of those builds. Mostly because he's still attacking and doing damage normally, he basically just gets free bull rushes when he does so, so even if he can't win the checks, he's at least still contributing in the fight.</p><p></p><p>Another would be an Eidolon (Summoner). They can eventually grow to Huge size (and are a valid target for Enlarge Person!) with strength in the mid to high 40s. I was just in a party with an Eidolon with just such specs. It's really trivially easy to accomplish. IIRC, there's also an Evolution for a Push special ability, too.</p><p></p><p>At mid/high levels a Druid could also be good for this. Using Elemental Body to turn into an Earth Elemental gives you the Push special attack (good luck figuring out the distance, it's based on a creature's statblock rather than some universal formula, and actual earth elementals don't have push; my DM just ruled it was a distance equal to the elemental's natural reach (before any magic/buffs to extend it), so 15 ft for a huge earth elemental), and you'll eventually get to be size huge. Again, sizeable str and size, and since it's just a free bullrush to add to your attacks you lose nothing for attempting it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 5749188, member: 35909"] The problem with combat maneuvers is how ridiculously fast CMD climbs. Look at some monsters at various CRs to see. It is very, very hard to land a maneuver at higher levels, and at lower levels you can usually just kill in -3 hits anyway. Big monsters will have crazy CMD. Even medium sized humanoids will fast grow theirs: not only is it adding two stats instead of one, it's adding all sorts of other random crap, like dodge/insight/deflection AC bonuses... If you build heavily towards optimizing your bonus on a maneuver, you can make it reliably effective much of the time, but it requires a lot of investment. And on the note of how difficult succeeding at maneuvers is... As the guy who [url=http://www.enworld.org/forum/pathfinder-rpg-discussion/308795-dual-shield-ranger-build-help.html]made that Ranger build[/url], I just have to say how awful bull rush IS in PF. Unlike all other maneuvers (except drag now, I guess...a lot of those new maneuvers should've just been folded into existing ones as other applications...), bull rush requires you to do more than win. You want to win by a LOT. You get 5 ft, and then need to win by [b]five[/b](!!!) for each extra square you need to push someone. That's just simply not happening most of the time. In 3E, it was possible to drive someone back a fair distance since it was just an opposed str check and you could easily buff your bonus much higher than a foe's str mod, plus he could roll low and you could roll high (in PF, the foe basically gets to "take 10" every time you try). I just don't see that happening much in PF. So unless your DM has a habit of putting non-mook enemies adjacent to cliff faces and the like, that 5 ft just isn't going to cut it for separating a guy from his pals or just clearing him 10+ ft away so he can't full attack on his turn. I suppose you could use bull rush to grant allies already in melee AoOs...but PF nerfed that, too. You used to be able to do that part at least without any feat at all. Now in PF, you need 3 feats and at least 6 levels to do what an untrained commoner could do in 3E (use bull rush to generate AoOs)! I would suggest bull rush for only a very very select few hyper specialized builds that can make the best use out of it. My Ranger build (or a ranger two-handing a single heavy shield works, also) is one of those builds. Mostly because he's still attacking and doing damage normally, he basically just gets free bull rushes when he does so, so even if he can't win the checks, he's at least still contributing in the fight. Another would be an Eidolon (Summoner). They can eventually grow to Huge size (and are a valid target for Enlarge Person!) with strength in the mid to high 40s. I was just in a party with an Eidolon with just such specs. It's really trivially easy to accomplish. IIRC, there's also an Evolution for a Push special ability, too. At mid/high levels a Druid could also be good for this. Using Elemental Body to turn into an Earth Elemental gives you the Push special attack (good luck figuring out the distance, it's based on a creature's statblock rather than some universal formula, and actual earth elementals don't have push; my DM just ruled it was a distance equal to the elemental's natural reach (before any magic/buffs to extend it), so 15 ft for a huge earth elemental), and you'll eventually get to be size huge. Again, sizeable str and size, and since it's just a free bullrush to add to your attacks you lose nothing for attempting it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Focusing on Combat Maneuvers... is it worth it?
Top