Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 4499700" data-attributes="member: 1656">But a Warlord with a longsword can designate an adjacent enemy as the target of Commander's Strike, while a Warlord with a longspear can designate an enemy one or two squares away as the target.  Because the power has the Weapon keyword, and is dependent on the weapon the Warlord is using as an accessory.The Warlord at-will, Furious Smash, has the Weapon keyword.  It deals damage equal to your Str modifier on a hit.  There is no damage roll, so anything that adds to damage rolls will be ignored.  But would you agree that this damage, when the power is used with a weapon as an accessory (as the Weapon keyword allows) is 'damage dealt by this weapon'?  If the Warlord has a +1 Flaming longsword, he'll get to add the longsword's proficiency bonus and enhancement bonus to the attack roll, and he can make the damage he deals (Str modifier, no [W]) be fire damage via the weapon's at-will power?The flavour text of Furious Smash says that you bash him with your shield, or hit him with the pommel, or drive your shoulder into his gut.  Would you agree that the longsword's bonuses apply to the attack roll, and the Flaming weapon's at-will applies, even if the player describes the attack as being with his shield or his shoulder... as long as the Flaming longsword is the Weapon used as the accessory?-Hyp.</blockquote>