Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fomorian Cackler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Markn" data-source="post: 4975869" data-attributes="member: 21827"><p>This power is from a level 1 creature in MM2.</p><p></p><p>Tendril Flurry (standard; recharge 5,6) • Psychic</p><p>Ranged 10; targets one, two, or three creatures; +4 vs. Reflex;</p><p>2d4 + 1 psychic damage.</p><p></p><p>Having 3 attacks for a potential of 6d4+3 would be pretty potents on one creature.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, it does not contain wording such as "make 3 attacks" or damage of "per hit".</p><p></p><p>It's also possible that the attack, whether against 1, 2 or 3 creatures is meant to be resolved with 1 roll and if thats the case that would support only 1 attack per target.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, you have monsters in the MM2 like the weretiger that specifically calls out making 2 attacks, albeit melee (without target limitations). With no target limitations, you can make 2 attacks against any number of targets up to 2 because thats how many attacks you have. With a target limitation without a number of attacks, it would indicate that you could make 1 attack up to the specified number of targets otherwise they would say you get X number of attacks without specifying targets since by default you are limited to the number off targets equalling the number of attacks.</p><p></p><p>Hope that makes sense...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Markn, post: 4975869, member: 21827"] This power is from a level 1 creature in MM2. Tendril Flurry (standard; recharge 5,6) • Psychic Ranged 10; targets one, two, or three creatures; +4 vs. Reflex; 2d4 + 1 psychic damage. Having 3 attacks for a potential of 6d4+3 would be pretty potents on one creature. Additionally, it does not contain wording such as "make 3 attacks" or damage of "per hit". It's also possible that the attack, whether against 1, 2 or 3 creatures is meant to be resolved with 1 roll and if thats the case that would support only 1 attack per target. Additionally, you have monsters in the MM2 like the weretiger that specifically calls out making 2 attacks, albeit melee (without target limitations). With no target limitations, you can make 2 attacks against any number of targets up to 2 because thats how many attacks you have. With a target limitation without a number of attacks, it would indicate that you could make 1 attack up to the specified number of targets otherwise they would say you get X number of attacks without specifying targets since by default you are limited to the number off targets equalling the number of attacks. Hope that makes sense... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fomorian Cackler
Top