Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
For Nail - The Psion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="two" data-source="post: 2264777" data-attributes="member: 9002"><p><strong>old haste parallel</strong></p><p></p><p>Another link to the old 3.0 "haste" debate.</p><p></p><p>There were those that thought 3.0 haste perfectly balanced because if a spellcaster did the Haste+Spell_of_your_choice on the first round of battle, and cast 2 spells per round after that, the spellcaster is "using up their spells twice as quickly as if they had not cast haste." Which people then claimed made it balanced (somehow).</p><p></p><p>My standard reply to this is: killing the enemy 2x as fast by using 2x as many spells in the same amount of time is far more advantageous than not. When you kill the 3 giants quickly via haste+spells, they don't have a chance to do as many full attacks; don't get to damage your fighters as much; don't drain away Clerical healing spells as fast; etc. Not to mention, the battle is over more quickly, conserving all the other party resources: bard spells, cleric spells, druid spells, etc. etc. Meaning, if the battle is over in 4 instead of 6 rounds, that's 2 rounds of spellcasting the cleric didn't have to do; 1-2 precious spells the bard didn't cast. Etc. Pretty obvious, and pretty obvious to the 3.5 revision team as well.</p><p></p><p>So, the question is, if a Psion DOES use up all their power points in, for example, 1 battle: what does that mean, exactly?</p><p></p><p>a) The Psion was incredibly wasteful and wanton in their use of power points.</p><p>b) The encounter was very, very difficult, and the power points had to be expended to save the Psion, kill the enemies, rescue party members, etc.</p><p></p><p>As long as you are not incredibly inefficient, using up all your power points in one single battle isn't a bad thing. The ABILITY to do so isn't a disadvantage, to be sure. After all, if it was a Wizard instead of a Psion in the battle, perhaps the party suffers a TPK (it was the Psions' ability to max everything out that saved everyone's rears).</p><p></p><p>My point: if a Psion isn't being wasteful and does manage to use all their power points in one battle, the party better thank their lucky stars they had a Psion around. Else they might very well all be dead (the encouter was very, very, very tough).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="two, post: 2264777, member: 9002"] [b]old haste parallel[/b] Another link to the old 3.0 "haste" debate. There were those that thought 3.0 haste perfectly balanced because if a spellcaster did the Haste+Spell_of_your_choice on the first round of battle, and cast 2 spells per round after that, the spellcaster is "using up their spells twice as quickly as if they had not cast haste." Which people then claimed made it balanced (somehow). My standard reply to this is: killing the enemy 2x as fast by using 2x as many spells in the same amount of time is far more advantageous than not. When you kill the 3 giants quickly via haste+spells, they don't have a chance to do as many full attacks; don't get to damage your fighters as much; don't drain away Clerical healing spells as fast; etc. Not to mention, the battle is over more quickly, conserving all the other party resources: bard spells, cleric spells, druid spells, etc. etc. Meaning, if the battle is over in 4 instead of 6 rounds, that's 2 rounds of spellcasting the cleric didn't have to do; 1-2 precious spells the bard didn't cast. Etc. Pretty obvious, and pretty obvious to the 3.5 revision team as well. So, the question is, if a Psion DOES use up all their power points in, for example, 1 battle: what does that mean, exactly? a) The Psion was incredibly wasteful and wanton in their use of power points. b) The encounter was very, very difficult, and the power points had to be expended to save the Psion, kill the enemies, rescue party members, etc. As long as you are not incredibly inefficient, using up all your power points in one single battle isn't a bad thing. The ABILITY to do so isn't a disadvantage, to be sure. After all, if it was a Wizard instead of a Psion in the battle, perhaps the party suffers a TPK (it was the Psions' ability to max everything out that saved everyone's rears). My point: if a Psion isn't being wasteful and does manage to use all their power points in one battle, the party better thank their lucky stars they had a Psion around. Else they might very well all be dead (the encouter was very, very, very tough). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
For Nail - The Psion
Top