Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[For ORCUS] Convince me that I can "do 1E" with 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Philotomy Jurament" data-source="post: 3791221" data-attributes="member: 20854"><p>Right; I think the system has a big impact on play and also on the way situations/obstacles are presented (e.g. d20 presentation is typically much, much more quantified). </p><p></p><p>Obviously, I disagree with Clark (and many others) on 3E/d20 being more fun. I played 3E with 1E style for years. I had fun, but overall it wasn't working out for me. So I moved to C&C. That was better, and the change was something of a catalyst; it triggered an evaluation of what I like in gaming, what worked for me and what didn't, et cetera. When I ran 3E, I really got into the "system mastery" part (the "behind the curtain" stuff), which is something I hadn't done when playing earlier editions. So I took that "system mastery approach" and applied it to the older editions, on their terms. What I found was that many of the things I had considered weird or broken or goofy weren't broken at all; they were just operating under a different set of assumptions. I also discovered that those assumptions worked well for me, once embraced. I eventually made my way to OD&D(1974), which is perfect for me: definitely old-school with old-school assumptions and style, familiar in many ways, and wide-open for tweaking and house-ruling. All the time that I was playing 3E, and even C&C, I was always looking for the older-edition experience; it was a relief to find it and embrace it. I'm amazed (and chagrined) that it took me so long to realize that what I sought was right there all along.</p><p></p><p>Incidentally, this isn't nostalgia. For one thing, I never played OD&D(1974), back in the day. For another, I'm a better DM than I was when I played older-editions, before. Lots better. I've brought that 3E notion of system mastery/knowledge to OD&D, and that's made a big difference in how I view and run the game; I understand the older-editions better than I did, before, so I play them better, too. In any case, nostalgia might prompt you to re-try something, but it won't keep you there. In fact, nostalgia-driven experiences are often a disappointment: you re-read that novel you loved in junior high and discover it just isn't as good as you remember. Or you catch a few episodes of that well-loved cartoon series on TV, and can't believe you found this entertaining. Et cetera. Rose-colored glasses shift your perception when you're <em>looking</em> back, but when you actually <em>go</em> back, the glasses don't work: at that point, it's the real deal -- enjoyable or not. For me, the real deal (i.e. older editions) are more fun. Really. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>So I say, if you're looking for 1E feel in your gaming, <em>do</em> give the 1E rules a shot, again, and approach them for what they are (i.e. embrace the assumptions -- don't try to make them something they're not, or they *will* be broken). Who knows, it might be what you're looking for. </p><p></p><p>If you've already done this and it didn't work for you, or you don't need to do it because you're comfortable in your preferences, that's fine. I know that many people simply prefer the d20 rules. I don't have a problem with that at all. I'm not posting all this to argue or fan the flames of an edition war. (Hopefully that's come across in my post, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to explicitly state it.)</p><p></p><p>For my part, I wish Necromancer Games were putting out some products using the older rules (e.g. occasional ones like Goodman has been doing), or even something for C&C, for that matter. I wish you were a little less "progressive" in your system preferences, Clark. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Anyway, I went by my FLGS and picked up <em>City of Brass</em>, earlier. I've been skimming through it. Most impressive, so far. You guys sure do pack these boxed sets full: Wilderlands, RARE, and City of Brass have all been filled to the brim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Philotomy Jurament, post: 3791221, member: 20854"] Right; I think the system has a big impact on play and also on the way situations/obstacles are presented (e.g. d20 presentation is typically much, much more quantified). Obviously, I disagree with Clark (and many others) on 3E/d20 being more fun. I played 3E with 1E style for years. I had fun, but overall it wasn't working out for me. So I moved to C&C. That was better, and the change was something of a catalyst; it triggered an evaluation of what I like in gaming, what worked for me and what didn't, et cetera. When I ran 3E, I really got into the "system mastery" part (the "behind the curtain" stuff), which is something I hadn't done when playing earlier editions. So I took that "system mastery approach" and applied it to the older editions, on their terms. What I found was that many of the things I had considered weird or broken or goofy weren't broken at all; they were just operating under a different set of assumptions. I also discovered that those assumptions worked well for me, once embraced. I eventually made my way to OD&D(1974), which is perfect for me: definitely old-school with old-school assumptions and style, familiar in many ways, and wide-open for tweaking and house-ruling. All the time that I was playing 3E, and even C&C, I was always looking for the older-edition experience; it was a relief to find it and embrace it. I'm amazed (and chagrined) that it took me so long to realize that what I sought was right there all along. Incidentally, this isn't nostalgia. For one thing, I never played OD&D(1974), back in the day. For another, I'm a better DM than I was when I played older-editions, before. Lots better. I've brought that 3E notion of system mastery/knowledge to OD&D, and that's made a big difference in how I view and run the game; I understand the older-editions better than I did, before, so I play them better, too. In any case, nostalgia might prompt you to re-try something, but it won't keep you there. In fact, nostalgia-driven experiences are often a disappointment: you re-read that novel you loved in junior high and discover it just isn't as good as you remember. Or you catch a few episodes of that well-loved cartoon series on TV, and can't believe you found this entertaining. Et cetera. Rose-colored glasses shift your perception when you're [i]looking[/i] back, but when you actually [i]go[/i] back, the glasses don't work: at that point, it's the real deal -- enjoyable or not. For me, the real deal (i.e. older editions) are more fun. Really. ;) So I say, if you're looking for 1E feel in your gaming, [i]do[/i] give the 1E rules a shot, again, and approach them for what they are (i.e. embrace the assumptions -- don't try to make them something they're not, or they *will* be broken). Who knows, it might be what you're looking for. If you've already done this and it didn't work for you, or you don't need to do it because you're comfortable in your preferences, that's fine. I know that many people simply prefer the d20 rules. I don't have a problem with that at all. I'm not posting all this to argue or fan the flames of an edition war. (Hopefully that's come across in my post, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to explicitly state it.) For my part, I wish Necromancer Games were putting out some products using the older rules (e.g. occasional ones like Goodman has been doing), or even something for C&C, for that matter. I wish you were a little less "progressive" in your system preferences, Clark. :) Anyway, I went by my FLGS and picked up [i]City of Brass[/i], earlier. I've been skimming through it. Most impressive, so far. You guys sure do pack these boxed sets full: Wilderlands, RARE, and City of Brass have all been filled to the brim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
[For ORCUS] Convince me that I can "do 1E" with 4E
Top