Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
For the first time... apprehension
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adembroski" data-source="post: 3943368" data-attributes="member: 18869"><p>I'm WAY behind the times here.</p><p></p><p>Apparently the 4th edition announcement was made in August, and here I am in December just learning about it. Partially due to the fact, I suppose, that I spend a tiny fraction of the time online as I did then, partially due to the fact that in that time I have no had a game going (the longest such period since 3rd edition was released).</p><p></p><p>So I've spent most of the day pouring over the info available (surprisingly little, actually). I was around for the past four editions (AD&D 2nd Edition, AD&D 2nd Edition Player's Option, D&D 3rd Edition, and D&D 3.5) and in each case I can say I was genuinely excited. The only one that failed to live up to my expectations was Player's Option, which was more a matter of balance (the min/maxer's dream) than presentation or quality.</p><p></p><p>I have no issue with there being a new edition. A company must make money, otherwise there's no point to its existence. </p><p></p><p>But for the first time I find myself extremely apprehensive.</p><p></p><p>I get the impression that this edition is inspired not by a long standing role playing tradition nor a century of fantasy literature, as previous versions were. This seems to be the pen and paper son of Everquest, Utima Online, and World of Warcraft.</p><p></p><p>The core game continues to drift further and further from its Tolkienesque roots; the beautifully simple and recognizable foundation upon which world's can be molded from the DM's mind. In the place of that elegance is an almost forced mythology, with Tieflings... which should always be a DMs option... presented from the outset as a base race. </p><p></p><p>Further, we have roles which seem to mirror the common class roles in our pure-combat/no-role-play online RPGs. Might as well have cut to the chase and renamed the Fighter class "Tank".</p><p></p><p>There have been references to "Trees" rather than free form feats. The abominable power tree system from WoW does not free the player, it shackles him.</p><p></p><p>Dexterity now apparently counts full even when fully armored. One of the most logical and game-balancing changes of the 3rd edition has been scrapped for the sake of character power. </p><p></p><p>Also from our friends in the MMORPG business, fighters and paladins can now apparently will their opponents to attack them. Will we have a "threat" score as well?</p><p></p><p>Ah, the Warlord class... how wonderful, a class that can do pretty much the same thing any other class can do with the right skill combination. A warlord is not a class, it's a role.</p><p></p><p>Power Progression... gone are the days when a world can be defined by its prestige classes, another of the brilliant additions of 3rd edition. Now we are stuck on this destined path where we must reach a given level no matter what organization or devotion we wish to join with. There always were level issues, but they were adjustable... emphasizing the prestige of those with high requirements.</p><p></p><p>Dragonborn... once again, what should be a DM's discression race available at the outset, force the DM to be the bad guy if the race does not fit his world.</p><p></p><p>Multiclassing... FYI, sometimes restrictions are good things. To simply allow a character to willy-nilly grab whatever class/race combo they want generally does not make for a great game.</p><p></p><p>Wizardly implements... again, forcing the mythology of a campaign on us where it will may not fit.</p><p></p><p>Combat... listen, guys, there comes a point when speeding up combat takes too much complexity from an already simplified system. 3rd edition sped up combat to an astonishing degree. It seems like it's a bit too much of an emphasis at this point considering how well 3rd edition handled it.</p><p></p><p>4th edition skills focus on encounters... no use rope, no tailor... in other words, you're a video game character now. Stop your role playing, damn it!</p><p></p><p>Anyways, I'll stop now, I just wanted to get some weight behind my feelings. Maybe some of you can ease my fears, I'm sure I'll get a flame or two. Maybe I'm just overreacting... but I've never been hesitant about a new edition before... those issues just jumped out at me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adembroski, post: 3943368, member: 18869"] I'm WAY behind the times here. Apparently the 4th edition announcement was made in August, and here I am in December just learning about it. Partially due to the fact, I suppose, that I spend a tiny fraction of the time online as I did then, partially due to the fact that in that time I have no had a game going (the longest such period since 3rd edition was released). So I've spent most of the day pouring over the info available (surprisingly little, actually). I was around for the past four editions (AD&D 2nd Edition, AD&D 2nd Edition Player's Option, D&D 3rd Edition, and D&D 3.5) and in each case I can say I was genuinely excited. The only one that failed to live up to my expectations was Player's Option, which was more a matter of balance (the min/maxer's dream) than presentation or quality. I have no issue with there being a new edition. A company must make money, otherwise there's no point to its existence. But for the first time I find myself extremely apprehensive. I get the impression that this edition is inspired not by a long standing role playing tradition nor a century of fantasy literature, as previous versions were. This seems to be the pen and paper son of Everquest, Utima Online, and World of Warcraft. The core game continues to drift further and further from its Tolkienesque roots; the beautifully simple and recognizable foundation upon which world's can be molded from the DM's mind. In the place of that elegance is an almost forced mythology, with Tieflings... which should always be a DMs option... presented from the outset as a base race. Further, we have roles which seem to mirror the common class roles in our pure-combat/no-role-play online RPGs. Might as well have cut to the chase and renamed the Fighter class "Tank". There have been references to "Trees" rather than free form feats. The abominable power tree system from WoW does not free the player, it shackles him. Dexterity now apparently counts full even when fully armored. One of the most logical and game-balancing changes of the 3rd edition has been scrapped for the sake of character power. Also from our friends in the MMORPG business, fighters and paladins can now apparently will their opponents to attack them. Will we have a "threat" score as well? Ah, the Warlord class... how wonderful, a class that can do pretty much the same thing any other class can do with the right skill combination. A warlord is not a class, it's a role. Power Progression... gone are the days when a world can be defined by its prestige classes, another of the brilliant additions of 3rd edition. Now we are stuck on this destined path where we must reach a given level no matter what organization or devotion we wish to join with. There always were level issues, but they were adjustable... emphasizing the prestige of those with high requirements. Dragonborn... once again, what should be a DM's discression race available at the outset, force the DM to be the bad guy if the race does not fit his world. Multiclassing... FYI, sometimes restrictions are good things. To simply allow a character to willy-nilly grab whatever class/race combo they want generally does not make for a great game. Wizardly implements... again, forcing the mythology of a campaign on us where it will may not fit. Combat... listen, guys, there comes a point when speeding up combat takes too much complexity from an already simplified system. 3rd edition sped up combat to an astonishing degree. It seems like it's a bit too much of an emphasis at this point considering how well 3rd edition handled it. 4th edition skills focus on encounters... no use rope, no tailor... in other words, you're a video game character now. Stop your role playing, damn it! Anyways, I'll stop now, I just wanted to get some weight behind my feelings. Maybe some of you can ease my fears, I'm sure I'll get a flame or two. Maybe I'm just overreacting... but I've never been hesitant about a new edition before... those issues just jumped out at me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
For the first time... apprehension
Top