Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forced Movement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kingreaper" data-source="post: 5120252" data-attributes="member: 83870"><p>Except that there's a perfectly sensible reason, in-universe, why you wouldn't let an enemy be pushed past you: If you do, you're leaving yourself completely open to their attacks.</p><p>There's not such a reason for why you WOULD let an ally be pushed through you.</p><p>In addition: Being an ally would logically seem to require willingness on BOTH sides; while you might declare yourself an enemy warlord's ally before you spend an Action Point, that doesn't mean he'll agree with you, does it?</p><p>No. For Ally status to exist it's pretty clear that both parties have to agree to it.</p><p></p><p>You seem to be assuming that no-one ever cares for verisimilitude, and only wishes to manipulate the game for max advantage. That is not so.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: Is there, somewhere, a more thorough definition for "ally" that I'm missing. Because that seems to be the main point of disagreement, the only definition of ally I've seen in 4e is a willing recipient, with it being contextually clear that the other side of an "allies" power has a choice as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kingreaper, post: 5120252, member: 83870"] Except that there's a perfectly sensible reason, in-universe, why you wouldn't let an enemy be pushed past you: If you do, you're leaving yourself completely open to their attacks. There's not such a reason for why you WOULD let an ally be pushed through you. In addition: Being an ally would logically seem to require willingness on BOTH sides; while you might declare yourself an enemy warlord's ally before you spend an Action Point, that doesn't mean he'll agree with you, does it? No. For Ally status to exist it's pretty clear that both parties have to agree to it. You seem to be assuming that no-one ever cares for verisimilitude, and only wishes to manipulate the game for max advantage. That is not so. EDIT: Is there, somewhere, a more thorough definition for "ally" that I'm missing. Because that seems to be the main point of disagreement, the only definition of ally I've seen in 4e is a willing recipient, with it being contextually clear that the other side of an "allies" power has a choice as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forced Movement
Top