Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Critic of the Dawn" data-source="post: 3698389" data-attributes="member: 43085">As written in the creature's statblock, this appears to be the correct interpretation - however the wording of the poison entry leaves me a bit unconvinced about whether this makes sense.If this is the case, can one assume that if the party had worked together in a competent manner and had managed to slay the Troll, that the venom could have been harvested?&nbsp; If said venom was harvested and then applied to (for the sake of argument) the party druid's claws whilst in a wildshaped form, would it retain its ability to work against multiple creatures?&nbsp; And how would one determine when it ran out?&nbsp; Pure DM fiat?Agreed.That's what my gut is telling me even though the statblock appears to say differently.&nbsp; Can one take this as an example of the text trumping the table, or is the wording inconclusive enough (in your opinion) to warrant a judgement of &quot;DM Call&quot;.I was not aware that was the case.&nbsp; I suppose that effectively banishes any ambiguity about that factor of the question here.Eric</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Critic of the Dawn, post: 3698389, member: 43085"] As written in the creature's statblock, this appears to be the correct interpretation - however the wording of the poison entry leaves me a bit unconvinced about whether this makes sense. If this is the case, can one assume that if the party had worked together in a competent manner and had managed to slay the Troll, that the venom could have been harvested? If said venom was harvested and then applied to (for the sake of argument) the party druid's claws whilst in a wildshaped form, would it retain its ability to work against multiple creatures? And how would one determine when it ran out? Pure DM fiat? Agreed. That's what my gut is telling me even though the statblock appears to say differently. Can one take this as an example of the text trumping the table, or is the wording inconclusive enough (in your opinion) to warrant a judgement of "DM Call". I was not aware that was the case. I suppose that effectively banishes any ambiguity about that factor of the question here. Eric [/QUOTE]

Verification