Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Forgotten Realms - How would you publish this setting this time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="an_idol_mind" data-source="post: 6170166" data-attributes="member: 43749"><p>I kinda see this criticism as akin to saying, "The hostile desert setting drives some people away from Dark Sun."</p><p></p><p>I think the Realms is one of those settings where the mountains of lore are the big appeal. If you want a quasi-medieval fantasy setting without all that lore, there are many other options available.</p><p></p><p>(Note #1: I say this as somebody who hasn't played in the Realms for about 15 years - not because I don't like the lore but rather because I enjoy building my own setting much more.)</p><p></p><p>(Note #2: While I think the appeal is the huge amount of lore, WotC might decide that said appeal isn't getting them the customers they need, which seems to be their reasoning when they released the 4th edition Realms. The problem is that they need to clearly define what the new appeal of the setting will be and not pretend that they can recruit the same fanbase with a radically changed setting.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm personally of the belief that this is more of a player problem than anything else. Any setting that has a large canon is going to get folks like this, be it the Realms or Greyhawk or Golarion or even lesser-played settings like Birthright.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the Avatar Triology modules are among the worst adventures ever (as described in my zillion part series <a href="http://screamsheet.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/the-worst-adventure-ever-shadowdale-chapter-one/" target="_blank">over here</a>). However, painting those horrible modules as definitive of the Realms is like saying that the terrible Castle Greyhawk module defines the Greyhawk setting.</p><p></p><p>I think the big issue with the Realms is one of quality control. The 2nd edition products were largely a mixed bag, and the poor ones became notorious for how terrible they were. Most of the 3rd edition stuff was very bland, and the 4th edition stuff lacked a real direction. If WotC chooses what they want the Realms to be, sticks to their goals, and makes quality a top priority, I think they'll do fine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="an_idol_mind, post: 6170166, member: 43749"] I kinda see this criticism as akin to saying, "The hostile desert setting drives some people away from Dark Sun." I think the Realms is one of those settings where the mountains of lore are the big appeal. If you want a quasi-medieval fantasy setting without all that lore, there are many other options available. (Note #1: I say this as somebody who hasn't played in the Realms for about 15 years - not because I don't like the lore but rather because I enjoy building my own setting much more.) (Note #2: While I think the appeal is the huge amount of lore, WotC might decide that said appeal isn't getting them the customers they need, which seems to be their reasoning when they released the 4th edition Realms. The problem is that they need to clearly define what the new appeal of the setting will be and not pretend that they can recruit the same fanbase with a radically changed setting.) I'm personally of the belief that this is more of a player problem than anything else. Any setting that has a large canon is going to get folks like this, be it the Realms or Greyhawk or Golarion or even lesser-played settings like Birthright. I think the Avatar Triology modules are among the worst adventures ever (as described in my zillion part series [URL="http://screamsheet.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/the-worst-adventure-ever-shadowdale-chapter-one/"]over here[/URL]). However, painting those horrible modules as definitive of the Realms is like saying that the terrible Castle Greyhawk module defines the Greyhawk setting. I think the big issue with the Realms is one of quality control. The 2nd edition products were largely a mixed bag, and the poor ones became notorious for how terrible they were. Most of the 3rd edition stuff was very bland, and the 4th edition stuff lacked a real direction. If WotC chooses what they want the Realms to be, sticks to their goals, and makes quality a top priority, I think they'll do fine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Forgotten Realms - How would you publish this setting this time?
Top