Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zeromaru X" data-source="post: 9789287" data-attributes="member: 65487">I don't know. I'm still undecided. A single city-state is not the whole kingdom we had, and I don't like half-measures (but my therapist says one of my negative traits is that I see everything in black and white, lol). Also, I don't see the point about bringing back Unther while making it separate from Messemprar. Then, why destroy Tymanther if Unther is not even unified? They should have reduced Tymanther instead, just like the SCAG suggested, instead on wiping it out for nothing. We could have had Tymanther in the south, Hell-Unther in the middle and Free-Unther in the north.Until I don't find answers to that question, my brain won't stop seeing it that as a "loss", and so, I will be stuck in a vicious circle of "I preferred it the way I like it, now is ruined and knowing this change exist ruins it for me". And believe me, I've been trying to rationalize this. A friend even game me so ideas (like, this is a new timeline created after Vecna fumble it in Eve of Ruin).Not to mention that I did read the entry of Unther (a friend graciously showed me some screens), and the place is what I thought it would be. The description of Unther is basically Mordor without orcs. It's even mentioned that Unthalass is full of mud and blood because Gilgeam doesn't allow dissent.The feelings at the thought that people really prefers this over what we had (a place full of alien things and ruins and plots to adventure that are different from the rest of humanoland Faerûn) is making it hard for me not to think about what was lost. Like, it seems in D&D only humans and elves are allowed to have kingdoms, no matter if that kingdom is a hell-hole...</blockquote>

Verification