Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MG.0" data-source="post: 6765704" data-attributes="member: 6799436"><p>Sure, absolutely use whatever works for you!</p><p></p><p>My posts were mostly in response to Hussar claiming that certain points of view were invalid due to established canon. I say that is complete hogwash.</p><p></p><p>Canon is of course, official material, but as you pointed out what constitutes official may vary slightly (do video games count? novels? comics? etc.) and may vary over time or from author to author and edition to edition. For a fun look at how crazy canon can be, try to reconcile pretty much anything in Star Trek. They never could maintain consistency, even from one episode to the next, let alone across seasons or series. That's why I find practically no value in the concept of a "shared world". By necessity everyone's version of it WILL be different. The value comes in using it as a starting point for ideas and to save work. I think Gygax understood this very well when he released the early Greyhawk products.</p><p></p><p>I suppose there is a bit of difference in philosophy in my point of view as well. Where some may see canon as the default path, and choosing to abandon it as a conscious decision; I much prefer the idea of complete freedom of imagination, with canon material as merely a single example of what can be done. It may seem like a small matter of semantics (glass half full vs half empty), but I think how you view it mentally has a pretty big impact on what you are willing to attempt in your games. We already get enough conditioning to accept commercial products as somehow superior to DIY without it watering down our imaginations as well.</p><p></p><p>In a way creating a campaign world is much more a destructive act than constructive, i.e. for every choice you make, you rule out countless other possibilities. Limiting yourself to a single interpretation made by a committee or an unrelated string of authors stretched over decades whose primary goal is to sell books, would be a disserve to yourself and your players, don't you think?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MG.0, post: 6765704, member: 6799436"] Sure, absolutely use whatever works for you! My posts were mostly in response to Hussar claiming that certain points of view were invalid due to established canon. I say that is complete hogwash. Canon is of course, official material, but as you pointed out what constitutes official may vary slightly (do video games count? novels? comics? etc.) and may vary over time or from author to author and edition to edition. For a fun look at how crazy canon can be, try to reconcile pretty much anything in Star Trek. They never could maintain consistency, even from one episode to the next, let alone across seasons or series. That's why I find practically no value in the concept of a "shared world". By necessity everyone's version of it WILL be different. The value comes in using it as a starting point for ideas and to save work. I think Gygax understood this very well when he released the early Greyhawk products. I suppose there is a bit of difference in philosophy in my point of view as well. Where some may see canon as the default path, and choosing to abandon it as a conscious decision; I much prefer the idea of complete freedom of imagination, with canon material as merely a single example of what can be done. It may seem like a small matter of semantics (glass half full vs half empty), but I think how you view it mentally has a pretty big impact on what you are willing to attempt in your games. We already get enough conditioning to accept commercial products as somehow superior to DIY without it watering down our imaginations as well. In a way creating a campaign world is much more a destructive act than constructive, i.e. for every choice you make, you rule out countless other possibilities. Limiting yourself to a single interpretation made by a committee or an unrelated string of authors stretched over decades whose primary goal is to sell books, would be a disserve to yourself and your players, don't you think? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
Top