Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6784331" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>In the DL game, it's adding a lot to my experience of the game without forcing everyone in the party into a "with me or against me" scenario. That's exactly what I'm looking for out of it - a way that I, as a player, can make sense of something that I regard as a player as kind of idiotic (like the Balance and DL gnomes), to make it something I can enjoy, without having to tromp all over everyone else's idea of the setting in the meantime. It remains in the background until it's something the rest of the party and the DM chooses to opt into. The alternative is to either make the game all about my character, or to grump about how stupid certain parts of DL are constantly (or try to veto playing in the setting), and neither of these ideas are half as much fun as trying to find something I can play that is fun for me.</p><p></p><p>FR would be similar - I would want to have fun by playing something that was fun for me, which means playing something that would tear down that wall given a chance, and who would look for adventures by looking for ways to do that. But presuming that there are other things my character is worried about up front (the return of Tiamat, the Elder Elemental Eye, escaping the underdark, whatever), it's likely to be a personality trait and not a campaign theme. That's OK - the alternative is to force it on everyone or to just refuse to play in FR, and both of those are ego trips I'm not interested in. Life's too short for that. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The intent is that nobody HAS to work with it. It's hardly a secret (though my gnome character's behavior makes the message opaque and confusing, and he doesn't bother explaining himself much of the time). It's just not something that must dominate the gameplay, which means it's something compatible with other quests and missions. </p><p></p><p>It's not like a character who wants to tear down the Wall of the Faithless might not share other goals with the party, even if they disagree on that point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 6784331, member: 2067"] In the DL game, it's adding a lot to my experience of the game without forcing everyone in the party into a "with me or against me" scenario. That's exactly what I'm looking for out of it - a way that I, as a player, can make sense of something that I regard as a player as kind of idiotic (like the Balance and DL gnomes), to make it something I can enjoy, without having to tromp all over everyone else's idea of the setting in the meantime. It remains in the background until it's something the rest of the party and the DM chooses to opt into. The alternative is to either make the game all about my character, or to grump about how stupid certain parts of DL are constantly (or try to veto playing in the setting), and neither of these ideas are half as much fun as trying to find something I can play that is fun for me. FR would be similar - I would want to have fun by playing something that was fun for me, which means playing something that would tear down that wall given a chance, and who would look for adventures by looking for ways to do that. But presuming that there are other things my character is worried about up front (the return of Tiamat, the Elder Elemental Eye, escaping the underdark, whatever), it's likely to be a personality trait and not a campaign theme. That's OK - the alternative is to force it on everyone or to just refuse to play in FR, and both of those are ego trips I'm not interested in. Life's too short for that. The intent is that nobody HAS to work with it. It's hardly a secret (though my gnome character's behavior makes the message opaque and confusing, and he doesn't bother explaining himself much of the time). It's just not something that must dominate the gameplay, which means it's something compatible with other quests and missions. It's not like a character who wants to tear down the Wall of the Faithless might not share other goals with the party, even if they disagree on that point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
Top