Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6786881" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>I'd 100% agree with this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This, not so much. If we're simply going to start comparing home games, we'd have to establish lengthy baselines every single conversation and have to do so for discussions with every single other player we talk about.</p><p></p><p>If I say "I'm playing in FR", it's probably safe to assume that there is a Cormyr and a Waterdeep and a bajillion gods that govern the physics of the setting. If I want to depart from that, I should state so up front that that's what I'm doing.</p><p></p><p>Note, this entire conversation has been about canon FR. About trying to pin down exactly what that canon is. Now, for my home game, I can do whatever I please and I'd probably go back to the idea that the Wall is there to keep the Far Realms out. Something I mentioned way back at the beginning of this thread. But, for the purposes of discussing the Realms with other people, I certainly can't assume that my version of the Wall is anything other than my version of the Wall.</p><p></p><p>It's like when you try to discuss game rules. If I say I'm playing Edition X, it's safe to assume that the RAW of Edition X is what we're talking about. I've seen far too many conversations entirely derailed by people trying to pass of their version of the rules as what the rules actually say. It leads to far too much confusion. We need a common baseline to start from and then we can go from there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6786881, member: 22779"] I'd 100% agree with this. This, not so much. If we're simply going to start comparing home games, we'd have to establish lengthy baselines every single conversation and have to do so for discussions with every single other player we talk about. If I say "I'm playing in FR", it's probably safe to assume that there is a Cormyr and a Waterdeep and a bajillion gods that govern the physics of the setting. If I want to depart from that, I should state so up front that that's what I'm doing. Note, this entire conversation has been about canon FR. About trying to pin down exactly what that canon is. Now, for my home game, I can do whatever I please and I'd probably go back to the idea that the Wall is there to keep the Far Realms out. Something I mentioned way back at the beginning of this thread. But, for the purposes of discussing the Realms with other people, I certainly can't assume that my version of the Wall is anything other than my version of the Wall. It's like when you try to discuss game rules. If I say I'm playing Edition X, it's safe to assume that the RAW of Edition X is what we're talking about. I've seen far too many conversations entirely derailed by people trying to pass of their version of the rules as what the rules actually say. It leads to far too much confusion. We need a common baseline to start from and then we can go from there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
Top