Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6790046" data-attributes="member: 22779">Oh sure [MENTION=6785785]hawkeyefan[/MENTION]. As I said, virtually all of the campaigns I've run or played in have allowed most characters and been very flexible. I'm simply in the process of shifting preferences from flexible and open to much more rigid and restrictive. Under no circumstances should this be considered a universal. Actually IME this is very much an outlier. But it's ironic though. I've been told in no uncertain terms numerous times on this board that it is 100% up to the DM to allow or disallow concepts in a campaign and DM's can disallow anything for any reason. But when I actually apply that, I'm being told I'm unreasonable or not acting in the spirit of the setting. It's very ironic. I'm more than willing to accommodate player concepts within the constraints of the setting. What I'm not interested in anymore is the "anti-setting" character.</blockquote>