Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ilbranteloth" data-source="post: 6793129" data-attributes="member: 6778044"><p>Actually, I think [MENTION=2067]I'm A Banana[/MENTION]'s primary issue with the Wall lies in what he perceives as the unjust nature of an atheist who leads an otherwise good life is still sentenced to the wall since he's faithless. </p><p></p><p>My position is that unless that atheist specifically denied the existence or worthiness of the Gods, that is they actively railed against the existence or power of the pantheon, not just a single Power, they would most likely be judged on their deeds and avoid the wall by going to the domain of the Power that most closely resembled their beliefs. Although this isn't spelled out in canon (and some potentially contradicts this), I think the evidence regarding the other pantheons in the realms bear this out.</p><p></p><p>In addition, I think the very process of judgement by Kelemvor implies that one's deeds and life is taken into account. Otherwise no judgement need be made.</p><p></p><p>I think the secondary issue he has with the wall is the nature of it as punishment. But there are a lot of other potential punishments in the afterlife and nobody seems to have an issue with that.</p><p></p><p>Kelemvor's position is that there will be transparency and fair and equal judgement for the dead. He only judges those at risk of being labeled as faithless or false. But there would be no judgement if that classification was a foregone conclusion.</p><p></p><p>Having said all that, if the Powers and the very afterlife is powered by faith, and people know that (to whatever degree), then refusing to participate is a denial and against the cosmological rules (thus a 'sin'), and punishable as such. I don't think he feels this is correct, and my position is that there is a lot of room for interpretation here. As a result, while there may be some mistakes made, I think the majority of those punished in the wall are actually evil, but without a claim by the evil Powers. This is also probably a good thing, because if faith and souls are what powers the domain of the Deities, then the fewer souls that populate an evil domain, the better.</p><p></p><p>So I think I understand his position, I just don't agree completely, nor do I feel any compelling need to dismantle the wall. </p><p></p><p>Ilbranteloth</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ilbranteloth, post: 6793129, member: 6778044"] Actually, I think [MENTION=2067]I'm A Banana[/MENTION]'s primary issue with the Wall lies in what he perceives as the unjust nature of an atheist who leads an otherwise good life is still sentenced to the wall since he's faithless. My position is that unless that atheist specifically denied the existence or worthiness of the Gods, that is they actively railed against the existence or power of the pantheon, not just a single Power, they would most likely be judged on their deeds and avoid the wall by going to the domain of the Power that most closely resembled their beliefs. Although this isn't spelled out in canon (and some potentially contradicts this), I think the evidence regarding the other pantheons in the realms bear this out. In addition, I think the very process of judgement by Kelemvor implies that one's deeds and life is taken into account. Otherwise no judgement need be made. I think the secondary issue he has with the wall is the nature of it as punishment. But there are a lot of other potential punishments in the afterlife and nobody seems to have an issue with that. Kelemvor's position is that there will be transparency and fair and equal judgement for the dead. He only judges those at risk of being labeled as faithless or false. But there would be no judgement if that classification was a foregone conclusion. Having said all that, if the Powers and the very afterlife is powered by faith, and people know that (to whatever degree), then refusing to participate is a denial and against the cosmological rules (thus a 'sin'), and punishable as such. I don't think he feels this is correct, and my position is that there is a lot of room for interpretation here. As a result, while there may be some mistakes made, I think the majority of those punished in the wall are actually evil, but without a claim by the evil Powers. This is also probably a good thing, because if faith and souls are what powers the domain of the Deities, then the fewer souls that populate an evil domain, the better. So I think I understand his position, I just don't agree completely, nor do I feel any compelling need to dismantle the wall. Ilbranteloth [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Forgotten Realms] The Wall of the Faithless
Top