Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PatEllis15" data-source="post: 962895" data-attributes="member: 1718">quote:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ----------------------------------------------------------------------------&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Personally, I prefer GH to FR. It's far less defined. In&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; t he 1983 GH set....&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; --------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote:What the hell?Ah... Encaladus, your not serious are you?Perhaps its all relative...Was Mystara more or less Defined than Greyhawk? Dragonlance? FR?Yes to all 3.What your are not differentiaties with your list is the amount of info.&nbsp; Most of hte items you list are adventures with 2-3 paragraphs of information.&nbsp; Yep, they are certainly juicy, but that is not quite teh same as FR1, Fr2, FR3 etc that served as sourcebooks detailing the major NPC's and locations for each major region in FR.To quote Bild91 accurately:&quot;n the 1983 GH set, the country descriptions were only a few paragraphs long. It's quite the playground for DMs. You are given a few pieces of structure and you fill in the rest. It's more of a tinkerer's setting than FR.&quot;Nothing in that is false...&nbsp; FR doesn't need to be defended in the way in which you feel you must...Taro SaraskPat E</blockquote>

[QUOTE="PatEllis15, post: 962895, member: 1718"] quote: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Personally, I prefer GH to FR. It's far less defined. In t he 1983 GH set.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: What the hell? Ah... Encaladus, your not serious are you? Perhaps its all relative... Was Mystara more or less Defined than Greyhawk? Dragonlance? FR? Yes to all 3. What your are not differentiaties with your list is the amount of info. Most of hte items you list are adventures with 2-3 paragraphs of information. Yep, they are certainly juicy, but that is not quite teh same as FR1, Fr2, FR3 etc that served as sourcebooks detailing the major NPC's and locations for each major region in FR. To quote Bild91 accurately: "n the 1983 GH set, the country descriptions were only a few paragraphs long. It's quite the playground for DMs. You are given a few pieces of structure and you fill in the rest. It's more of a tinkerer's setting than FR." Nothing in that is false... FR doesn't need to be defended in the way in which you feel you must... Taro Sarask Pat E [/QUOTE]

Verification