Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked - Flatfooted and the beginning of combat.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4972187" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Your quote has the attribute of not saying what you said I said? I'm not seeing how you can actually quote me and then continue to say that it says something I didn't say. Did you read what you quoted? </p><p></p><p>I repeat I did not say that being alert and being flatfooted is a violation of the rules, and I did not say that catching someone flatfooted when they're expecting a fight is surreal. </p><p></p><p>Once again, for maybe the 20th time in this thread, it has been my contention that if you are alert to a threat but haven't yet taken an action that you are flatfooted, <em>but if you are alert to a threat but have taken an action that you are not flatfooted</em>. A being alert to a threat that has taken an action is not flatfooted; but that doesn't mean that any alert being is not flatfooted. Obviously, those that have not yet acted are still flatfooted. That is what I said and what I've always said, and the line you quote says that.</p><p></p><p>Likewise the completely out of context quote 'Surreal.' does not say, "catching someone flatfooted when they're expecting a fight is surreal". I thought I had already made it perfectly clear and at length that what I thought surreal was the contortions necessary to justify, "I'm ready, but I'm not QUITE ready". You are either ready are you are not ready. If you aren't quite ready, then you are not ready. </p><p></p><p>Person #1: "Are you ready?"</p><p>Person #2: "Yes."</p><p>Person #1 does whatever.</p><p>Person #2: "Wait. Wait. When I said I was ready I didn't mean I was ready ready."</p><p></p><p>And speaking of contortions:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok, sure, concievably if the scene went on for hours and hours there might be a lapse in readiness, but I haven't even addressed that nor for that matter do the rules particularly address long duration actions all that well (it's only in 3rd edition that we first get formal notions of fatigue, for example). But sure, if the scene went on for hours and hours with both sides tensely holding themselves ready, at some point readiness might lapse. The rules don't address such things directly, but I suppose an endurance check would be in order or some such. However, why do we need to assume such a complication in order to establish that not all fights begin as ambushes? I don't need to address such a circumstance to make my central point, which is, once again, that according to the rules once an alert character has taken an action, he is no longer flatfooted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4972187, member: 4937"] Your quote has the attribute of not saying what you said I said? I'm not seeing how you can actually quote me and then continue to say that it says something I didn't say. Did you read what you quoted? I repeat I did not say that being alert and being flatfooted is a violation of the rules, and I did not say that catching someone flatfooted when they're expecting a fight is surreal. Once again, for maybe the 20th time in this thread, it has been my contention that if you are alert to a threat but haven't yet taken an action that you are flatfooted, [I]but if you are alert to a threat but have taken an action that you are not flatfooted[/I]. A being alert to a threat that has taken an action is not flatfooted; but that doesn't mean that any alert being is not flatfooted. Obviously, those that have not yet acted are still flatfooted. That is what I said and what I've always said, and the line you quote says that. Likewise the completely out of context quote 'Surreal.' does not say, "catching someone flatfooted when they're expecting a fight is surreal". I thought I had already made it perfectly clear and at length that what I thought surreal was the contortions necessary to justify, "I'm ready, but I'm not QUITE ready". You are either ready are you are not ready. If you aren't quite ready, then you are not ready. Person #1: "Are you ready?" Person #2: "Yes." Person #1 does whatever. Person #2: "Wait. Wait. When I said I was ready I didn't mean I was ready ready." And speaking of contortions: Ok, sure, concievably if the scene went on for hours and hours there might be a lapse in readiness, but I haven't even addressed that nor for that matter do the rules particularly address long duration actions all that well (it's only in 3rd edition that we first get formal notions of fatigue, for example). But sure, if the scene went on for hours and hours with both sides tensely holding themselves ready, at some point readiness might lapse. The rules don't address such things directly, but I suppose an endurance check would be in order or some such. However, why do we need to assume such a complication in order to establish that not all fights begin as ambushes? I don't need to address such a circumstance to make my central point, which is, once again, that according to the rules once an alert character has taken an action, he is no longer flatfooted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked - Flatfooted and the beginning of combat.
Top